空间活动问卷的修订及信效度检验

心理与行为研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 289-296.

• 基础心理学 • 下一篇

空间活动问卷的修订及信效度检验

赵悦彤¹, 孙晓娟², 白倩³, 张向葵^1,4

1. 东北师范大学心理学院，长春 130024;
2. 北京联合大学师范学院，北京 100011;
3. 东北师范大学教育学部，长春 130024;
4. 东北师范大学儿童发展研究中心，长春 130024

收稿日期:2020-11-24 出版日期:2021-05-20 发布日期:2021-05-20
通讯作者: 张向葵,E-mail:zhangxiangkui@126.com
基金资助:
奕阳教育研究院2018年青年学者研究项目（SEI-QXZ-2018-23）

Revision of Spatial Activity Questionnaire and Its Reliability and Validity

ZHAO Yuetong¹, SUN Xiaojuan², BAI Qian³, ZHANG Xiangkui^1,4

1. School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024;
2. Teachers’ College of Beijing Union University, Beijing 100011;
3. Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024;
4. Research Center of Children Development, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024

Received:2020-11-24 Online:2021-05-20 Published:2021-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了得到适用于中国文化背景的空间活动问卷，本研究以2988名大学生为对象，对Cherney和Voyer（2010）开发的空间活动问卷进行修订。根据多元方差分析和探索性因素分析结果，得到了能够反映游戏活动的空间成分和性别偏好的8个因素。进一步缩减条目得到了25题的中文版空间活动问卷，包含5个维度，分别是男性化的–空间的、男性化的–非空间的、女性化的–空间的、女性化的–非空间的和中性化的–空间的。验证性因素分析结果支持精简后所得到的5因素模型，信效度指标良好。中文版空间活动问卷因素结构清晰合理，是未来相关领域研究的可靠测量工具。

关键词: 空间活动, 空间能力, 童年活动, 性别差异

Abstract: In order to obtain the spatial activity questionnaire suitable for Chinese cultural background, this study revised the spatial activity questionnaire developed by Cherney and Voyer based on the data of 2988 undergraduates. Multivariate analysis of variance and exploratory factor analysis showed that eight factors could reflect the spatial component and gender preference of games and activities. The Chinese version of the 25-question spatial activity questionnaire was further simplified by reducing the items, which contained five factors, namely masculine-spatial, masculine-nonspatial, feminine-spatial, feminine-nonspatial and neutral-spatial. The confirmatory factor analysis results supported the five-factor model obtained after simplification, and the reliability and validity indexes were good. The Chinese version of the Space Activity Questionnaire has a clear and reasonable structure, which is a reliable measurement tool for future research in related fields.

Key words: spatial activity, spatial ability, childhood activity, gender difference

中图分类号:

B842

赵悦彤, 孙晓娟, 白倩, 张向葵. 空间活动问卷的修订及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 289-296.

ZHAO Yuetong, SUN Xiaojuan, BAI Qian, ZHANG Xiangkui. Revision of Spatial Activity Questionnaire and Its Reliability and Validity[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(3): 289-296.

参考文献

杜丹, 苏彦捷. (2005). 性别刻板印象及刻板信息对3~9岁儿童玩具选择的影响. 心理学探新, 25(4), 56-61, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2005.04.012
方新, 钱铭怡, 罗珊红, 訾非. (2006). 大学生完美主义问卷的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 20(9), 613-616, doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2006.09.020
刘红云. (2020). 高级心理统计. 北京:中国人民大学出版社.
刘惠军, 高红梅. (2012). 状态-特质愤怒表达量表修订版在大学生中的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 26(1), 70-76, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2012.01.016
沈康身. (2012). 智力玩具九连环研究. 高等数学研究, 15(5), 56-63, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1399.2012.05.030
许世红, 黄毅英. (2013). 培养儿童空间认知能力的有效途径探究——以拆拼孔明锁为例. 数学教育学报, 22(2), 91-94
张豹, 刘树辉, 缪素媚, 黄赛. (2019). 动作电子游戏经验对视觉注意的积极影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(6), 1283-1286, 1290, doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2019.06.043
郑建君, 金盛华, 马国义. (2009). 组织创新气氛的测量及其在员工创新能力与创新绩效关系中的调节效应. 心理学报, 41(12), 1203-1214, doi:10.3724/SP.J.024.2009.01203
郑希付, 宫火良. (2006). 《青少年心理健康素质调查表》个性素质分量表的编制. 心理与行为研究, 4(2), 85-89
Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1995). Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 7(4), 363-379, doi:10.1016/1041-6080(95)90007-1.
Bates, J. E., & Bentler, P. M. (1973). Play activities of normal and effeminate boys. Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 20-27, doi:10.1037/h0035057.
Blakemore, J. E. O., & Centers, R. E. (2005). Characteristics of boys' and girls' toys. Sex Roles, 53(9), 619-633, doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7729-0.
Cherney, I. D., & Voyer, D. (2010). Development of a spatial activity questionnaire I:Items identification. Sex Roles, 62(1-2), 89-99, doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9710-9.
De Lisi, R., & Wolford, J. L. (2002). Improving children's mental rotation accuracy with computer game playing. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(3), 272-282, doi:10.1080/00221320209598683.
Doyle, R. A., Voyer, D., & Cherney, I. D. (2012). The relation between childhood spatial activities and spatial abilities in adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 112-120, doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2012.01.002.
Hult, R. E., Jr., & Brous, C. W. (1986). Spatial visualization:Athletic skills and sex differences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63(1), 163-168, doi:10.2466/pms.1986.63.1.163.
Idle, T., Wood, E., & Desmarais, S. (1993). Gender role socialization in toy play situations:Mothers and fathers with their sons and daughters. Sex Roles, 28(11), 679-691, doi:10.1007/BF00289987.
Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the purdue spatial visualization tests:Visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 69-94, doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x.
Miller, C. L. (1987). Qualitative differences among gender-stereotyped toys:Implications for cognitive and social development in girls and boys. Sex Roles, 16(9), 473-487, doi:10.1007/BF00292482.
Moè, A., Jansen, P., & Pietsch, S. (2018). Childhood preference for spatial toys. Gender differences and relationships with mental rotation in STEM and non-STEM students. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 108-115, doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.10.003.
Newcombe, N., Bandura, M. M., & Taylor, D. G. (1983). Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9(3), 377-386, doi:10.1007/BF00289672.
Peterson, E. G., Weinberger, A. B., Uttal, D. H., Kolvoord, B., & Green, A. E. (2020). Spatial activity participation in childhood and adolescence:Consistency and relations to spatial thinking in adolescence. Cognitive Research:Principles and Implications, 5(1), 43, doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00239-0.
Robert, M., & Héroux, G. (2004). Visuo-spatial play experience:Forerunner of visuo-spatial achievement in preadolescent and adolescent boys and girls? Infant and Child Development, 13(1), 49-78, doi:10.1002/icd.336.
Schug, M. G. (2016). Geographical cues and developmental exposure:Navigational style, wayfinding anxiety, and childhood experience in the Faroe Islands. Human Nature, 27(1), 68-81, doi:10.1007/s12110-015-9245-4.
Serbin, L. A., & Connor, J. M. (1979). Sex-typing of children's play preferences and patterns of cognitive performance. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 134(2), 315-316, doi:10.1080/00221325.1979.10534065.
Signorella, M. L., Krupa, M. H., Jamison, W., & Lyons, N. (1986). A short version of a spatial activity questionnaire. Sex Roles, 14(9), 475-479, doi:10.1007/BF00287448.
Sprafkin, C., Serbin, L.A., Denier, C., & Connor, J.M. (1983).Sex-differentiated play:Cognitive consequences and early interventions. In M.B. Liss (Ed.), Social and cognitive skills:Sex roles and children's play (pp.167-192).New York:Academic Press.
Vieites, V., Pruden, S. M., & Reeb-Sutherland, B. C. (2020). Childhood wayfinding experience explains sex and individual differences in adult wayfinding strategy and anxiety. Cognitive Research:Principles and Implications, 5(1), 12, doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00220-x.
Voyer, D., Nolan, C., & Voyer, S. (2000). The relation between experience and spatial performance in men and women. Sex Roles, 43(11), 891-915, doi:10.1023/A:1011041006679.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. (1995). Magnitude of sex-differences in spatial abilities:A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250-270, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250.
Yuan, L., Kong, F., Luo, Y. M., Zeng, S. Y., Lan, J. J., & You, X. Q. (2019). Gender differences in large-scale and small-scale spatial ability:A systematic review based on behavioral and neuroimaging research. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 128, doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00128.

[1]	岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦. 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入：状态焦虑与性别的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 226-232.
[2]	侯娟, 郑心怡, 王秀, 方晓义. 金钱与时间感受启动对择偶标准的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.
[3]	郭庆童, 徐铭雪, 许春艳, 刘秀丽. 大学生宿舍人际关系困扰与手机成瘾的关系：序列中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 650-656.
[4]	魏淑华, 赵健, 董及美, 陈功香. 工作对家庭的增益与中小学教师的工作满意度：职业认同的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 125-130,136.
[5]	张振, 齐春辉, 付淑英, 王青春, 熊建萍. 社会距离和性别对公平关注的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 100-106.
[6]	李甜甜, 吕勇. 面部表情觉知阈限的测量及其年龄和性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 771-777.
[7]	兰晓芳,张锦坤. 负面评价恐惧的性别差异：基于内隐和外显测量的比较[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 25-30.
[8]	李悠, 江信文, 王飞雪. 性别及控制感对中国大学生信任行为的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(6): 847-850.
[9]	姚昭；王振宏；雷榕3. 词—面孔任务中的情绪效价冲突效应及性别差异[J]. , 2011, 9(3): 181-184.
[10]	吕勇, 于乐, 刘亚平. 面孔再认能力性别差异的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(1): 18-22.
[11]	郑金香,阴国恩. 幼儿自由游戏行为性别差异的观察研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(2): 415-418.

空间活动问卷的修订及信效度检验

Revision of Spatial Activity Questionnaire and Its Reliability and Validity

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价