刺激–反应联结学习在项目特异性比例一致效应中的作用

心理与行为研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 326-333.

刺激–反应联结学习在项目特异性比例一致效应中的作用

夏天生¹, 谭玲²

1. 广东工业大学艺术与设计学院，广州 510090;
2. 广东工业大学管理学院，广州 510520

收稿日期:2020-06-20 出版日期:2021-05-20 发布日期:2021-05-20
通讯作者: 谭玲,E-mail:tanling@gdut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金一般项目（18BYY089）；教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（16YJC190022）

The Role of Stimulus-Response Association Learning on Item-Specific Proportional Congruency Effect

XIA Tiansheng¹, TAN Ling²

1. School of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510090;
2. School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520

Received:2020-06-20 Online:2021-05-20 Published:2021-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 比例一致效应通常被用来研究认知控制的动态变化，其中项目特异性比例一致效应是其重要分支。当前研究分别以任务的无关属性（空间位置）与相关属性（颜色）进行比例偏置操纵，考察联结学习与注意调节在比例一致效应中的作用。结果发现，在刺激–反应编码具有显著性优势的条件下，当位置作为信号时，被试可以利用刺激–反应联结学习反转比例一致效应；当颜色作为信号时，联结学习不起作用，比例一致效应消失。这些结果表明刺激–反应联结学习在比例一致效应中起到主要作用，符合显著性编码假说的预期。

关键词: 认知控制, 项目比例一致效应, 刺激–反应联结, 任务相关维度, 任务无关维度

Abstract: The literature on proportion congruency effect mainly focuses on the dynamic change of cognitive control, and one stream of research concentrates on item-specific proportion congruency effect. In the present study, the roles of association learning and attention regulation in proportion congruency effect were investigated by using the proportional bias manipulation of task relevant attributes (color) and task irrelevant attributes (spatial location) respectively. The results showed that under the condition that stimulus-response coding had significant advantages, when the location was used as a signal, the participants could use learned stimulus-response association to reverse conflict effect, as the stimulus-response ratio under different conditions was different so that individuals could learn the high probability of stimulus-response to predict the correct response. Whereas color was used as a signal, proportion congruency effect disappeared, as the stimulus-response ratio under different conditions was the same so that individuals could not learn the high probability of stimulus-response to predict the correct response. These results suggest that stimulus-response association learning plays a major role in proportion congruency effects, being consistent with the expectation of salient coding hypothesis.

Key words: cognitive control, item-specific proportional congruency effect, stimulus-response association, task-relevant dimension, task-irrelevant dimension

中图分类号:

B842

夏天生, 谭玲. 刺激–反应联结学习在项目特异性比例一致效应中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 326-333.

XIA Tiansheng, TAN Ling. The Role of Stimulus-Response Association Learning on Item-Specific Proportional Congruency Effect[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(3): 326-333.

参考文献

李政汉, 杨国春, 南威治, 李琦, 刘勋. (2018). 冲突解决过程中认知控制的注意调节机制. 心理科学进展, 26(6), 966-974
夏天生, 谭玲. (2020). 情境特异比例一致性变化对冲突效应的影响. 心理科学, 43(5), 1049-1057
Blais, C., & Verguts, T. (2012). Increasing set size breaks down sequential congruency:Evidence for an associative locus of cognitive control. Acta Psychologica, 141(2), 133-139, doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.009.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624-652, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624.
Bugg, J. M., & Chanani, S. (2011). List-wide control is not entirely elusive:Evidence from picture-word Stroop. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 930-936.
Bugg, J. M., & Hutchison, K. A. (2013). Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 433-449, doi:10.1037/a0029145.
Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Chanani, S. (2011). Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 844-859, doi:10.1037/a0019957.
Cao, Y., Cao, X. Y., Yue, Z. Z., & Wang, L. (2017). Temporal and spectral dynamics underlying cognitive control modulated by task-irrelevant stimulus-response learning. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(1), 158-173.
De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity:A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731-750, doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731.
Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39(6), 427-439, doi:10.1016/0001-6918(75)90041-4.
Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes:Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 638-644.
Lien, M. C., Pedersen, L., & Proctor, R. W. (2016). Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks:Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object? Psychological Research, 80(6), 912-934, doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0699-0.
Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled:Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7(3), 166-174.
Marble, J. G., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Mixing location-relevant and location-irrelevant choice-reaction tasks:Influences of location mapping on the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 26(5), 1515-1533, doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.5.1515.
Schmidt, J. R. (2013). The parallel episodic processing (PEP) model:Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 142(1), 119-126, doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.004.
Schmidt, J. R. (2016). Temporal learning and rhythmic responding:No reduction in the proportion easy effect with variable response-stimulus intervals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 634.
Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect:Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 514-523, doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514.
Schmidt, J. R., & Lemercier, C. (2019). Context-specific proportion congruent effects:Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(5), 1119-1130, doi:10.1177/1747021818787155.
Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2008). Hebbian learning of cognitive control:Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review, 115(2), 518-525, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.518.
Xia, T. S., Li, H., & Wang, L. (2016). Implicitly strengthened task-irrelevant stimulus-response associations modulate cognitive control:Evidence from an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 37(2), 756-772, doi:10.1002/hbm.23064.

[1]	朱海,白学军. 不同反应重复量对反应抑制后效应的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 186-190.
[2]	朱昭红, 马骁, 张俊峰. 心理疲劳对认知控制和动机影响的外周生理机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 752-758.
[3]	白学军, 朱海. 不同刺激重复量对反应抑制后效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 301-304.
[4]	张锦坤,白学军,连榕. 记忆监控的准确性与有效记忆[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(4): 284-288.
[5]	焦江丽,；王勇慧；边国栋4. 认知控制对基于位置和颜色返回抑制的影响[J]. , 2009, 7(1): 44-49.