权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程

心理与行为研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 417-423.

权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程

贾磊¹, 陆家豪¹, 王逸², 张常洁²

1. 浙江师范大学心理系，金华 321004;
2. 浙江工业大学心理系，杭州 310023

收稿日期:2020-06-28 出版日期:2021-05-20 发布日期:2021-05-20
通讯作者: 贾磊,E-mail:jialei@zjnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
浙江省社科领军人才培育专项课题（21YJRC09-2YB）

Metaphorical Conflict Control in the Conceptual Mapping of Social Power: Processing Characteristic and Stages

JIA Lei¹, LU Jiahao¹, WANG Yi², ZHANG Changjie²

1. Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004;
2. Department of Psychology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023

Received:2020-06-28 Online:2021-05-20 Published:2021-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用ERP技术探讨了权力概念的隐喻冲突机制。实验基于空间Stroop任务变式，使用身份词对作为刺激，操作词对间的字体大小和左右位置，检验权力的大小隐喻和左右隐喻与其概念表征存在冲突时的认知加工过程。行为结果发现，词对的字体大小与位置左右共同影响了权力概念判断，呈现隐喻冲突的基本特点。ERP结果显示隐喻冲突连续体现在早期N1、N2pc成分，以及晚期N400、NSW和LPC成分上。结果表明，权力的概念判断可同时受到大小隐喻和左右隐喻的影响。因隐喻知觉线索与概念表征失匹配而引发的隐喻冲突，不仅会出现在早期注意阶段，也会出现在晚期的语义编码和评估阶段。

关键词: 社会权力, 隐喻, 具身认知, 事件相关电位（ERP）

Abstract: This study explored the cognitive mechanisms of the metaphorical conflict control in the conceptual representation of social power using event-related potentials. In the present study, a spatial Stroop task was employed, and word-pairs of social statuses were utilized as stimuli. Through manipulating the relative font sizes of the word-pairs and their spatial positions, the time-course of the metaphorical conflicts among the font sizes, spatial positions, and the social power concepts were examined. Behavioral results revealed typical characteristics of metaphorical conflicts, in which the social power judgment on word-pairs was significantly affected by font sizes, spatial positions, and their interactions. Moreover, ERP results showed that metaphorical conflict processing was continually manifested in early N1 and N2pc components, as well as N400, NSW and LPC components. Our study showed that the semantic representation of social power was simultaneously affected by metaphors of font size and spatial position. Additionally, the metaphorical conflict caused by the conflict between perceptual clues and conceptual representation arose not only at the early perceptual processing stage but also at the later semantic evaluation stage.

Key words: social power, metaphor, embodied cognitive, event-related potential (ERP)

中图分类号:

B849

贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.

JIA Lei, LU Jiahao, WANG Yi, ZHANG Changjie. Metaphorical Conflict Control in the Conceptual Mapping of Social Power: Processing Characteristic and Stages[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.

参考文献

彭志宪. (1986). 从尊右到尊左的礼俗和语词. 新疆教育学院学报, (2), 120-126
唐佩佩, 叶浩生, 杜建政. (2015). 权力概念与空间大小:具身隐喻的视角. 心理学报, 47(4), 514-521
武向慈, 王恩国. (2014). 权力概念加工对视觉空间注意定向的影响:一个ERP证据. 心理学报, 46(12), 1871-1879
杨惠兰, 何先友, 赵雪汝, 张维. (2015). 权力的概念隐喻表征:来自大小与颜色隐喻的证据. 心理学报, 47(7), 939-949
殷融, 曲方炳, 叶浩生. (2012). 具身概念表征的研究及理论述评. 心理科学进展, 20(9), 1372-1381
赵静. (2018). 国内政务礼仪"尊左"传统溯源考. 南京工业职业技术学院学报, 18(1), 42-43
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645, doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
Bartholow, B. D. (2010). On the role of conflict and control in social cognition:Event-related brain potential investigations. Psychophysiology, 47(2), 201-212, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00955.x.
Chinese Linguistic Data Consortium. (2003). 现代汉语通用词表[Chinese lexicon] (CLDC-LAC-2003-001). Beijing:Tsing-hua University, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems, and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation.
Giessner, S. R., & Schubert, T. W. (2007). High in the hierarchy:How vertical location and judgments of leaders' power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 30-44, doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.001.
He, X. L., Chen, J., Zhang, E. T., & Li, J. N. (2015). Bidirectional associations of power and size in a priming task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 290-300, doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.996155.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Mazza, V., Turatto, M., and Caramazza, A. (2009). Attention selection, distractor suppression and N2pc. Cortex, 45(7), 879-890, doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.009.
Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness:Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1-21, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1.
Schubert, T. W., Waldzus, S., & Giessner, S. R. (2009). Control over the association of power and size. Social Cognition, 27(1), 1-19, doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.1.1.
Tzuyin Lai, V., & Curran, T. (2013). ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors. Brain and Language, 127(3), 484-496, doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.010.
Wu, X. C., Jia, H. B., Wang, E. G., Du, C. G., Wu, X. H., & Dang, C. P. (2016). Vertical position of Chinese power words influences power judgments:Evidence from spatial compatibility task and event-related Potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 102, 55-61, doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.03.005.
Zanolie, K., van Dantzig, S., Boot, I., Wijnen, J., Schubert, T. W., Giessner, S. R., & Pecher, D. (2012). Mighty metaphors:Behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension. Brain and Cognition, 78(1), 50-58, doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.006.

[1]	赵思怡, 李莹, 王悦. 情绪效价−空间动作隐喻联结对成人和儿童外语情绪词学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 153-159.
[2]	贺晓玲, 刘奕晴, 那琳娜. 3～5岁幼儿颜色映射道德和权力概念的认知发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 636-641.
[3]	宋宜琪, 杨婉晴, 梁丹丹. 6～8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童空间概念“大”的隐喻映射研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 460-465.
[4]	李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[5]	张潮, 刘赛芳, 隋玲, 乔园园. 宽容概念的大小隐喻表征：双向性及社会性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 824-830.
[6]	王汉林, 莫雷. “动作-评价”效应：动作与认知的交互作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 626-632.
[7]	毛晓翎, 王分分, 曹静, 祝卓宏. 多范例训练提升儿童隐喻理解能力的干预性研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 675-682.
[8]	李莹, 吴军, 梁园园, 王悦. 不同性质汉语否定句心理加工过程的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 309-316.
[9]	方溦,葛列众,甘甜. 道德具身认知的理论研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 765-772.
[10]	张颖颖, 于方静, 周治金, 陈宝国. 汉语时间-空间隐喻加工垂直偏向性的稳固性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 446-462.
[11]	吴念阳，陈纤纤，吴燕，钱海燕. 5-7岁儿童绘画中社会地位的“大/小”隐喻表征^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 50-56.
[12]	汪新筱, 张积家, 王悦. 时间空间隐喻在汉语动词语义加工中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 744-750.
[13]	官群. 中文数量语义更多为上的空间动觉一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 589-594.
[14]	吕勇, 韩宗义, 杜英春. 启动效应的ERP研究综述[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(2): 151-155.