实验性恶心与呕吐——大脑皮层与内脏相关研究的新途径

心理与行为研究 ›› 2004, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1): 373-377.

实验性恶心与呕吐——大脑皮层与内脏相关研究的新途径

潘芳,梁宝勇

天津师范大学心理与行为研究中心,天津 300074

收稿日期:2004-01-26 出版日期:2004-03-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
作者简介:潘芳,女,山东大学医学院教授,天津师范大学心理与行为研究中心博士生。梁宝勇,男,天津师范大学心理与行为研究中心教授,博士生导师。

EXPERIMENTAL NAUSEA AND VOMTING——THE NEW WAY TO STUDY THE BRAIN AND GUT RELATIONSHIP

Pan Fang,Liang Baoyong

Research Center of Psychology and Behavior in Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074

Received:2004-01-26 Online:2004-03-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 大脑皮层与内脏关系的脑机制是揭示心身疾病和心理疾病的重要依据。本文综述了经典条件学习与期待性恶心与呕吐的关系以及实验性恶心与呕吐的研究方法。作者认为,实验性恶心与呕吐结合脑成像技术是研究大脑皮层与内脏关系神经机制的重要途径。

关键词: 皮层-内脏关系, 经典条件反射, 期待性恶心与呕吐, 实验性恶心与呕吐, 脑影像

Abstract: The Theory of brain-gut relationship could be used to explain psychosomatic diseases and mental illness. The paper summarized the classical conditioning and anticipatory nausea and vomiting, the study methods of experimental nausea and vomiting. Experimental nausea and vomiting and the brain imagination are the good ways to study neural mechanism of brain and gut relationship.

Key words: Brain-gut relationship, classical conditioning, Anticipatory nausea and vomiting, Experimental nausea and vomiting, Brain imagination

中图分类号:

B845.1

潘芳,梁宝勇. 实验性恶心与呕吐——大脑皮层与内脏相关研究的新途径[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(1): 373-377.

Pan Fang,Liang Baoyong. EXPERIMENTAL NAUSEA AND VOMTING——THE NEW WAY TO STUDY THE BRAIN AND GUT RELATIONSHIP[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2004, 2(1): 373-377.

参考文献

[1] Bueno L. Brain-gut mechanisms of visceral motor activity. Ne- urogastroenterology, Berlin, 1996, 1~17
[2] Andrykowski M A. Defining anticipatory nausea and vomiting: Differences among cancer chemotherapy patients who report pretreatment nausea. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1988, 11: 59~69
[3] Alba E, Bastus R, de Andrei L, et al. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting: Prevalence and predicators in chemotherapy patients. Oncology, 1989, 46: 26~30
[4] Bovbjerg D H, Redd W H, Jacobsen P B, et al. An experimental analysis of classically conditioned nausea during cancer chemotherapy. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1992, 54: 623~637
[5] Stockorst U, Klosterhalfen S & Steingruber H-J. Conditioned nausea and further side-effects in cancer chemotherapy: A review. Journal Psychysiology Supplement, 1998(Supple): 1~33
[6] Morrow G R, Dobkin P L. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting in cancer patient undergoing chemotherapy treatment: Prevalence, etiology, and behavioral interventions. Clinical Psychology Review, 1988, 8: 517~556
[7] Tyc V L, Mulhern R K, & Bieberich A A. Anticipatory nauses and vomiting in pediatric cancer patients: An analysis of conditioning and coping variables. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 1977, 18: 27~33
[8] Dolgin M J, Katz E R, Zeltzer L K, et al. Behavioral distress in pediatric patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Pediatrics, 1989, 84: 103~110
[9] Bernstein I L, Sigmund R A. Tumor anorexia: A learned food aversion? Science, 1980, 209: 416~418
[10] Bernstein I L. Taylor E M, & Bentson K L. TNF induced anorexia and learned food aversion are attenuated by area postrema lesion. American Journal of Physiolohy, 1991, 260: 906~910
[11] Bernstein I L, Gorhler L E, & Fenner D P. Learned aversion to proteins in rats on a dietary self-selection regimen. Behavioral Neuroscience, 1984, 98: 1065~1072
[12] Lasco T. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting: Are psychological factors adequately investigated? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1994, 33: 85~100
[13] Berridge K C, Grill H J, & Norgren R. Relation of consummatory responses and preabsorbtive insulin release to palatability and learned taste aversions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 1981, 95: 363~382
[14] Grill H C, & Norgren R. The taste reactivity test. I: Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats. Brain Research, 1978, 143: 263~279
[15] Meachum C L, & Bernatein I L. Conditioned responses to a taste conditioned stimulus paired with lithium chloride adminstration. Behavioral Neuroscience, 1990, 104: 711~715
[16] Best M, Best P, & Mickley G. Conditioned aversion to distinct environmental stimuli resulting from gastrointestinal distress. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973, 85: 250~257
[17] Parker L A, Hills K, & Jensen K. Behavioral CRs elicited by a lithium- or an amphetamine- pair contestual test chamber. Animal Learning and Behavior, 1984, 12: 307~315
[18] Wise R, Yokel R, & DeWitt H. Both positive reinforcement and conditioned aversion from amphetamine and from apomorphine in rats. Science, 1976, 191: 1273~1274
[19] Welzl H, D′Adamo P, Lipp H P. Conditioned taste aversion as a learning and memory paradigm. Behavior Brain Research, 2001, 125: 205~213
[20] Col R P, Oberling P, Miller R R. Recovery from one-trial overshadowing. Psychon Bull Rev 1999, 6: 424~431
[21] Loy I, Hall G. Taste aversion after ingestion of lithium chloride: an associative analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and physilolgical Psychology Issu 2002, 55: 365~380
[22] De Silva P, Rachman S. Human food aversions :nature and acquisition. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1987, 25: 457~468
[23] Klosterhalfen S, Ruttgers A, Krumery E, et al. Pavlovian Conditioning of taste aversion using a motion sickness paragigm. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 2000, 62: 671~677
[24] Klose J, Hausmann S, Otto B, et al. Repetitive body rotation alters subjective and objective nausea sensitivity. Gastroenterology 2001, 120: 716
[25] Stern M R, Hu S Q, Vasey M W, et al. Adapatation to vection-induced symptoms of sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989, 60: 566~572
[26] Okifuji A, Friedman A G. Experimental induced taste aversion in humans. Effects of overshadowing and acquisition. Behav Res Ther, 1992, 30: 23~32
[27] Bense S, Stephan T, Yousry T A, et al. Multisensory corical signal increases and decreases during vestibular galvanic stimulation (fMRI). J Neurophysiol, 2001, 85: 886~899
[28] Dieterich M, Brandt T. Brain activation studied on visual-vestibular and ocular motor interaction. Curr Opin Neurol 2000, 13: 8~13