类别学习中的认知学习机制

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 305-311.

类别学习中的认知学习机制

陈琳¹, 钟罗金², 郑允佳³, 莫雷²

1 中山大学国际汉语学院,广州 510275;
2 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州 510631;
3 广东金融学院应用心理研究所,广州 510521

收稿日期:2012-02-16 出版日期:2013-05-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 莫雷,男,华南师范大学心理应用研究中心教授,博士生导师。E-mail:molei@scnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:陈琳,女,中山大学国际汉语学院讲师,心理学博士。
基金资助:
本研究得到教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（11YJC190005）和2011年广东高校优秀青年创新人才培养计划项目（wym11006）的资助

The Cognitive Mechanism of Category Learning

Lin Chen¹, Luojin Zhong², Yunjia Zheng³, Lei Mo²

1 School of Chinese as a Second Language, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275;
2 Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631;
3 Institute of Psychology, Guangdong College of Finance, Guangzhou 510521

Received:2012-02-16 Online:2013-05-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用归类任务,比较不同知识条件、不同特征呈现方式下,对非定义特征维度的掌握,验证类别学习的认知学习机制。结果发现对非定义特征维度的掌握,在样例特征固定位置呈现条件下较多,而在样例特征随机呈现条件下较少;在知识定义特征维度条件下较多,而在机械定义特征维度条件下较少。研究结果支持了类别学习的认知学习机制。

关键词: 类别学习, 认知学习机制, 双机制, 错误驱动

Abstract: The experiment was to testify the cognitive mechanism in category learning. There were two factors: the property of defining dimension and the position of feature presentation. The results found that in the features fixed condition and knowledge defining dimension condition, learners learned more dimensions than other conditions. The results suggested that learners learned more features when feature relations were easy to get and supported the cognitive mechanism account.

Key words: category learning, cognitive mechanism, dual-processing mechanisms, error-driven mechanism

中图分类号:

B842.5

陈琳, 钟罗金, 郑允佳, 莫雷. 类别学习中的认知学习机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 305-311.

Lin Chen, Luojin Zhong, Yunjia Zheng, Lei Mo. The Cognitive Mechanism of Category Learning[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(3): 305-311.

参考文献

1 陈琳, 莫雷, 徐贵平, 郑允佳.(2011). 阻碍效应的理论研究述评. 华东师范大学学报, 29 , 39-46.
2 陈琳, 莫雷, 郑允佳.(2012a). 类别感知对类别学习中额外特征学习的影响. 华南师范大学学报, 196 , 57-62.
3 陈琳, 莫雷, 黄平, 郑允佳.(2012b). 阻碍效应范式中主题知识对类别学习的影响. 心理科学, 35 , 868-874.
4 陈琳, 莫雷, 郑允佳, 王雨函.(2013). 类别学习的阻碍效应与双机制理论. 心理科学, 36 , 356-363.
5 莫雷.(1998). 知识的类型与学习过程—学习双机制理论的基本框架. 课程·教材·教法, 5 , 20-24.
6 莫雷.(1999). 论人的学习基本类型与机制. 教育研究与实验, 1 , 38-41.
7 温红博.(2008). 特征概率对类别学习信息加工过程的影响 . 华南师范大学博士学位论文.
8 Anderson, A. L., Ross, B. H., & Chin-Parker, S.(2002). A further investigation of category learning by inference. Memory & Cognition, 30 , 119-128.
9 Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M.(1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105 , 442-481.
10 Blair, M. R., Watson, M. R., & Meier, K. M.(2009). Errors, efficiency, and the interplay between attention and category learning. Cognition, 112 , 330-336.
11 Billman, D., & Knutson, J.(1996). Unsupervised concept learning and value systematicity: a complex whole aids learning the parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22 , 458-475.
12 Bott, L., Hoffman, A. B., & Murphy, G. L.(2007). Blocking in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136 , 685-699.
13 Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A.(1956). A Study of Thinking . Oxford, England: Wiley.
14 Chen, L., Bott, L., & Mo, L. Feature learning in the absence of classification error (Under Review).
15 Denton, S. E., & Kruschke, J. K.(2006). Attention and salience in associative blocking. Learning & behavior, 34 , 285-304.
16 Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K.(1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127 , 107-140.
17 Evans, J.(2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59 , 255-278.
18 Heit, E., & Bott, L.(2000). Knowledge selection in category learning. In D. L. Medin(Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 163-199). San Diego: Academic Press.
19 Hoffman, A. B., Harris, H. D., & Murphy, G. L.(2008). Prior knowledge enhances the category dimensionality effect. Memory & Cognition, 36 , 256-270.
20 Hoffman, A., & Murphy, G. L.(2006). Category dimensionality and feature knowledge: When more features are learned as easily as fewer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32 , 301-315.
21 Kruschke, J. K.(1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99 , 22-44.
22 Kruschke, J. K., & Johansen, M. K.(1999). A model of probabilistic category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25 , 1083-1119.
23 Kruschke, J. K., Kappenman, E. S., & Hetrick, W. P.(2005). Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31 , 830-845.
24 Le Pelley, M. E., Beesley, T., & Suret, M. B.(2007). Blocking of human causal learning involves learned changes in stimulus processing. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 60 , 1468-1476.
25 Le Pelley, M. E., Oakeshott, S. M., & McLaren, I. P. L.(2005). Blocking and unblocking in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31 , 56-70.
26 Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A.(1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosinadou & A. Ortony(Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179-195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27 Mitchell, C. J., & Lovibond, P. F.(2002). Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: Blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B , 311-329.
28 Nosofsky, R. M.(1992). Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (pp. 149-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29 Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C.(1994). Rule-plus exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101 , 53-79.
30 Rehder, B.(2003a). A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29 , 1141-59.
31 Rehder, B.(2003b). Categorization as causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 27 , 709-748.
32 Rehder, B.(2007). Essentialism as a generative theory of classification. In A. Gopnik & L. Schultz(Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation (pp.190-207). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
33 Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B.(1975). Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7 , 573-605.
34 Shanks, D. R.(2010). Learning: From association to cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 61 , 271-301.
35 Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B.(1998). Category learning by inference and categorization. Journal of Memory and Language, 39 , 124-148.
36 Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B.(2000). Inference using categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26 , 776-795.

[1]	王家慰, 邓泳珊, 邢强. 学习顺序和材料相似性对听觉类别学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 750-755.
[2]	邢强, 孙海龙, 车敬上. 反馈效价影响家族相似性类别学习的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 300-307.
[3]	陈琳，钟罗金，李悠，莫雷. 特征呈现方式对类别知觉表征的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 577-582.
[4]	孙红梅, 阴国恩, 陈雪莹. 不同类别学习策略下的中医诊断学习:以舌诊学习为例[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 728-731.
[5]	刘亚军阴国恩杨会会. 观察式学习条件下类别维度与家族相似性类别学习[J]. , 2008, 6(1): 38-41.