面孔信任评价及其与信任倾向的关系

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4): 433-439.

• 基础心理学 • 下一篇

面孔信任评价及其与信任倾向的关系

徐芬¹, 蔡维香¹, 马凤玲¹, 吴定诚²

1 浙江理工大学心理系,杭州 310018;
2 北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京 100875

收稿日期:2012-03-14 出版日期:2013-07-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 马凤玲,女,浙江理工大学讲师。E-mail:maer.fling@163.com。
作者简介:徐芬,女,浙江理工大学教授。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家自然科学基金（31170996）、浙江省自然科学基金（Y2110369）和浙江理工大学科研启动基金（1013802-Y、1113833-Y）的资助

Evaluation of Face Trustworthiness and Its Relationship with Trust Propensity

Xu Fen¹, Cai Weixiang¹, Ma Fengling¹, Wu Dingcheng²

1 Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018;
2 National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received:2012-03-14 Online:2013-07-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 68名大学生对随机生成的300张面孔进行是否值得信任的评价,结果显示评价者对陌生面孔的初始信任程度不同,表明由结构特征所决定的面孔可信度的高低直接影响了评价者对其信任程度的高低。随后研究进一步考察了信任倾向与面孔信任评价间的关系,结果表明信任倾向与面孔信任评价间存在显著正相关,其中在“不值得信任面孔”评价中表现尤为显著。这些结果表明,面孔可信度和信任倾向两因素对于初始信任判断具有重要的影响作用。

关键词: 信任评价, 面孔可信度, 信任倾向, 初始信任

Abstract: By the trust evaluations of randomly generated 300 faces, we found that, participants rated the unfamiliar faces in different trustworthiness levels. Which suggested that initial trust was directly influenced by trustworthiness level based on facial features. This study showed the characteristics of face trust evaluation, and then further explored its relationships with trust propensity. Results showed that there were significant positive correlations between trust propensity and face evaluation, and the correlation was remarkable between the evaluation of untrustworthy faces and trust propensity. These results suggested that the trustworthiness of face and trust propensity were two important factors in the period of initial trust establishment.

Key words: trust evaluation, facial trustworthiness, trust propensity, initial trust

中图分类号:

B849

徐芬, 蔡维香, 马凤玲, 吴定诚. 面孔信任评价及其与信任倾向的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(4): 433-439.

Xu Fen, Cai Weixiang, Ma Fengling, Wu Dingcheng. Evaluation of Face Trustworthiness and Its Relationship with Trust Propensity[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(4): 433-439.

参考文献

1 Antoakis, J., & Dalgas, O.(2009). Predicting elections: child's play! Science, 323 (5918), 1183.
2 Ballew, C. C., & Todorov, A.(2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104 (46), 17948-17953.
3 Bernerth, J. B., & Walker, H. J.(2009). Propensity to trust and the impact on social exchange. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15 (3), 217-226.
4 Brownlow, S.(1992). Seeing is believing: facial appearance, credibility, and attitude change. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16 (2), 101-115.
5 Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A.(1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (2), 215-224.
6 Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C.(1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: a meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110 (1), 109-128.
7 Engell, A. D., Haxby, J. V., & Todorov, A.(2007). Implicit trustworthiness decisions: Automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 (9), 1508-1519.
8 Gill, H., Boies, K., Finegan, J. E., & McNally, J.(2005). Antecedents of trust: establishing a boundary condition for the relation between propensity to trust and intention to Trust. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19 (3), 287-302.
9 Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Jones, B. C., & Roberts, S. C.(2007). Facial appearance affects voting decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28 (1), 18-27.
10 Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Sinclair, S.(2001). Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5), 842-855.
11 Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D.(1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 709-734.
12 McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L.(1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 473-490.
13 Olivola, C. Y., & Todorov, A.(2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34 (2), 83-110.
14 Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A.(2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (32), 11087-11092.
15 Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A.(2009). Shared perceptual basis of emotional expressions and trustworthiness impressions from faces. Emotion, 9 (1), 128-133.
16 Rotter, J. B.(1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35 (4), 651-655.
17 Rotter, J. B.(1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26 (5), 443-452.
18 Rotter, J. B.(1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35 (1), 1-7.
19 Spector, M. D., & Jones, G. E.(2004). Trust in the workplace: factors affecting trust formation between team members. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144 (3), 311-321.
20 Stirrat, M., & Perrett, D. I.(2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21 (23), 349-354.
21 Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S.(2002). Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors′ faces: Evidence from a false recognition paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (5), 1051-1065.
22 Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C.(2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308 (5728), 1623-1626.
23 Todorov, A.(2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124 (1), 208-224.
24 Todorov, A., Baron, S. G., & Oosterhof, N. N.(2008). Evaluating face trustworthiness: a model based approach. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3 (2), 119-127.
25 Vannatta, K., & Gartstein, M. A., & Zeller, M., et al.(2009). Peer acceptance and social behavior during childhood and adolescence: how important are appearance, athleticism, and academic competence? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33 (4), 303-311.

[1]	游旭群, 李倩钦, 张桢堉, 黄浦江, 刘志远. N-back任务训练迁移效果及其影响因素：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 794-801.
[2]	熊思成, 张斌, 姜永志, 蒋怀滨, 陈芸. 手机成瘾流行率及其影响因素的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 802-808.
[3]	郭颖, 樊富珉, 张英俊, 刘宇. 团体咨询师胜任力量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 809-815.
[4]	姚崇, 惠琪, 王媛, 席海莎, 雒朝梁. 公费师范教师社会支持与职业倦怠的关系探究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 816-823.
[5]	李飞飞, 缴润凯, 刘丹, 尹航. 幼儿教师感恩特质与职业使命感的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 824-830.
[6]	周彦榜, 李强, 暴卿. 跨期决策中的偏好反转：突出性效应和兼容性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 831-837.
[7]	侯娟, 郑心怡, 王秀, 方晓义. 金钱与时间感受启动对择偶标准的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.
[8]	窦运来, 沈伊默. 参与式领导如何影响团队成员的工作表现？—有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 845-852.
[9]	杨槐, 龚少英, 苗天长, 李伟贺. 工作-非工作边界管理一致性与高校辅导员工作满意度的关系：工作投入的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 853-860.
[10]	王艳丽, 陈红. 城市社区居民获得感量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 665-670.
[11]	贾晓珊, 朱海东. 社会经济地位与儿童青少年心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 671-678.
[12]	黄明明, 陈丽萍, 郭莉萍, 赵守盈. 工作-家庭冲突与幼儿教师离职意向的关系：职业认同感与职业倦怠的序列中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 679-686.
[13]	刘传军, 谢忠桔, 王星元. 诱发高兴情绪会降低人们的道德规范敏感度吗？[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 687-694.
[14]	张霄钰, 朱海燕, 陈凤姣, 苏欣悦. 月是故乡明：家乡标签对风景图的情感和价值评估的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 695-700.
[15]	苏明宇, 王光明. STEAM训练提升小学生的注意抑制与注意集中能力[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 701-705.

面孔信任评价及其与信任倾向的关系

Evaluation of Face Trustworthiness and Its Relationship with Trust Propensity

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价