颜色对基于时间的视觉选择的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旨在探讨颜色属性对基于时间的图形预览搜索的影响及其机制。实验采用视觉标记实验范式的变式考察三种颜色的图形刺激的预览收益。结果发现：搜索与旧干扰物相同颜色的靶子和搜索新异颜色刺激并未出现反应时的差异，而且，两者都快于搜索与新干扰物颜色相同的靶子。这说明，在图形刺激的预览搜索中，观察者没有主动抑制旧干扰物的颜色，而是主动加工新出现的刺激。还探讨了基于颜色标记的抑制机制和主动非抑制机制。

关键词: 预览搜索, 预览收益, 颜色, 视觉标记

Abstract: The aim of the study was to examine whether the inhibition based on the colors of old items would occur, and whether the non-inhibition mechanism could explain the preview benefits in prioritizing selection in preview search based on time. In this experiment, three conditions which were all preview search conditions were included. The most obvious differences of the three conditions were that the color of targets was different for each condition. The results showed that the performances of green target were not slower than the blue target. Instead, the search performance of the green target was faster than that of the blue one and was the same as that of the yellow one. Therefore, the results did not seem to support visual marking hypothesis which emphasizes the inhibition of the old items, regardless of location-based or feature-based inhibition. Based on these findings, the top-down mechanism of non-inhibition processing of prioritizing selection in preview search was reinforced.

Key words: preview search, preview benefits, color, visual marking

中图分类号:

B842.2

郝芳, 刘长江. 颜色对基于时间的视觉选择的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 205-210.

Hao Fang，Liu Changjiang. The Influence of Color on Visual Search Based on Time[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(2): 205-210.

参考文献

[1] 郝芳.(2006). 预览搜索中优先选择的非抑制加工机制. 中国科学院心理研究所博士论文.
[2] 郝芳, 刘长江, 俞国良.(2009). 颜色高突显刺激的预览搜索. 人类工效学, 15(3), 38-41
[3] 郝芳, 刘长江, 俞国良.(2010). 预览搜索中颜色知觉突显对预览效益的影响. 心理科学, 33(1), 64-66
[4] Andrews, L. S., Watson, D. G., Humphreys, G. W., & Braithwaite, J. J.(2011). Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: Evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1007-1016.
[5] Al-Aidroos, N., Emrich, S. M., Ferber, S., & Pratt, J.(2012). Visual working memory supports the inhibition of processed information: Evidence from preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 643-663.
[6] Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Hulleman, J.(2003). Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(4), 758-778.
[7] Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Hulleman, J.(2005). Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(1), 81-101.
[8] Braithwaite, J. J., Watson, D. G., Andrews, L., & Humphreys, G. W.(2010). Visual search at isoluminance: Evidence for enhanced color weighting in standard subset and preview-based search. Vision Research, 50, 1414-1425.
[9] Chen, L.(1982). Topological structure in visual perception. Science, 218, 699-700.
[10] Dalton, P. & Lavie, N.(2012). Load theory of attention and cognitive control. In S. Kastner, & A. C. Nobre A(Eds.), Handbook of Attention. Oxford University Press.
[11] Donk, M.(2006). The preview benefit: Visual marking, feature-based inhibition, temporal segregation, or onset capture? Visual Cognition, 14, 736-748.
[12] Gibson, B. S., & Jiang Y.(2001). Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(1), 59-73.
[13] Humphreys, G. W., Olivers, C. N. L. & Yoon, E. Y.(2006). An onset advantage without a preview benefit: Neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 110-120.
[14] Lavie, N.(2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 75-82.
[15] Mühlenen, A., Watson, D., & Gunnell, D. O. A.(2013). Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1279-1290
[16] Neisser, U.(1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
[17] Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W.(2002). Visual marking under attentional blink conditions: More evidence for top-down limited capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 22-42.
[18] Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W.(2003). Visual marking inhibits singleton capture. Cognitive Psychology, 47(1), 1-42.
[19] Osugi, T., Kumada, T., & Kawahara, J.(2009). The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search. Visual Research, 49, 851-861.
[20] Osugi, T., Kumada, T., & Kawahara, J.(2010). Visual marking survives graphical change if meaning is retained. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2144-2156.
[21] Treisman, A., & Gormican, S.(1988). Feature analysis in early vision:, Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95(1), 15-48.
[22] Watson, D. G.(2001). Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 74-84.
[23] Watson, D. G., Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W.(2008). Resisting change: The influence of luminance changes on visual marking and the preview benefit. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1526-1539.
[24] Watson, D. G., Compton, S., & Bailey, H.(2011). Visual Marking: The influence of temporary changes on time-based visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 37, 1729-1738.
[25] Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W.(1997). Visual Marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition. Psychological Review, 104(1), 90-122.
[26] Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W.(1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 946-962.
[27] Watson, D. G., & Inglis, M.(2007). Eye movements and time-based selection: where do the eyes go in preview search? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(5), 852-857.
[28] Watson, D. G., & Kunar, M. A.(2012). Determining the capacity of time-based selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 350-366.
[29] Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M.(2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 483-502.
[30] Zhou, K., Huan, L., Zhou T. G., Zhuo Y., & Chen, L.(2010). Topological change disturbs object continuity in attentive tracking. PNAS, 107(50), 21920-21924.