儿童状态社会创造性的跨文化研究：基于中美文化的比较

心理与行为研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 230-236.

儿童状态社会创造性的跨文化研究：基于中美文化的比较

谷传华¹,张冬静¹,Yeh Hsueh², Xiangen Hu³

1 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室暨华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079;
2 College of education, University of Memphis, TN, USA 38152;
3 Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, TN, USA 38152）

收稿日期:2014-02-28 出版日期:2015-03-20 发布日期:2015-06-11
通讯作者: 谷传华
基金资助:
教育科学“十二五”规划国家青年基金课题（CDA110106）

The Cross-cultural Study on Children′s State Social Creativity: The Difference between China and the United States

Gu Chuanhua¹, Zhang Dongjing¹, Yeh Hsueh², Xiangen Hu³

1 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior(CCNU) of Ministry of Education, School of Psychology of Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079;
2 College of Education, University of Memphis, TN, USA 38152;
3 Department of Psychology,University of Memphis, TN, USA 38152

Received:2014-02-28 Online:2015-03-20 Published:2015-06-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从中国和美国中部地区选取小学儿童236人，采用状态社会创造性开放问卷和教师领导方式结构式问卷考察了儿童状态社会创造性的文化差异及其与教师领导方式的关系。结果表明：（1）总体上，美国儿童在社会性问题解决中表现出较强的流畅性和变通性等创造性思维品质，但中国儿童表现出较强的适当性、有效性和冒险性等社会适应和人格状态；（2）状态社会创造性总体上存在着国别与年级之间的交互作用，美国的四年级儿童状态社会创造性得分显著高于五年级儿童；（3）教师领导方式的各个维度均不存在显著的预测作用。中美儿童的状态社会创造性既有相似之处又有不同之处。

关键词: 状态社会创造性, 跨文化研究, 儿童

Abstract: The Open-ended Questionnaires of State Social Creativity and Structured Teachers′ Leadership Style Questionnaires were adopted to 236 children sampled from middle areas of China and the United States to investigate the cultural difference in their state social creativity and its relations to class teachers′ leadership style. The results indicated that, generally the U. S. children tended to have higher creative thinking ability including fluency and flexibility in social problem solving, and Chinese children tended to exhibit higher social abilities and personality state including appropriateness, validity, and risk-taking; significant interaction of country with grade was found on general state social creativity, and the U. S. children of the fourth grade scored higher than those of the fifth grade; none of dimensions of teacher′s leadership style could significantly predict children′s state social creativity solely. Both similarity and difference in state social creativity existed between the U. S. children and Chinese children.

Key words: state social creativity, cross-cultural study, children

中图分类号:

B844

谷传华, 张冬静,Yeh Hsueh,Xiangen Hu. 儿童状态社会创造性的跨文化研究：基于中美文化的比较[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 230-236.

Gu Chuanhua, Zhang Dongjing, Yeh Hsueh, Xiangen Hu. The Cross-cultural Study on Children′s State Social Creativity: The Difference between China and the United States[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(2): 230-236.

参考文献

[1] 陈丽, 张荣干, 唐庆意.(2003). 中西方中学生创造力比较调查报告，见: 教育部科学技术司, 共青团中央学校部, 中国科普研究所, 青少年创造力国际比较(47-54). 科学出版社.
[2] 胡卫平, Adey, 申继亮, 林崇德.(2004). 中英青少年科学创造力发展的比较. 心理学报, 26(5), 775-777.
[3] 谷传华.(2009). 小学儿童社会创造性倾向的发展. 心理与行为研究, 7(3), 198-202.
[4] 谷传华.(2011). 社会创造心理学. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
[5] 谷传华, 张海霞, 周宗奎.(2009). 小学儿童的社会创造性倾向与教师领导方式的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(3), 284-286.
[6] 谷传华, 张笑容, 陈洁.(2013). 状态与特质之分: 来自社会创造性的证据. 心理发展与教育,(5), 483-490.
[7] 韩琴.(2008). 课堂互动对学生创造性问题提出能力的影响. 博士论文, 华中师范大学.
[8] 林崇德.(2009). 创新人才与教育创新研究. 北京: 经济科学出版社.
[9] 申继亮, 赵景欣.(2007). 创造力的跨文化研究及其对我国教育改革的启示. 见: 中国心理学会, 心理学学科发展报告(79-86). 北京: 中国科学技术出版社.
[10] 施建农, 徐凡, 周林, 查子秀.(1999). 从中德儿童技术创造性跨文化研究结果看性别差异. 心理学报, 31(4), 428-434.
[11] 衣新发, 蔡曙山, 刘钰.(2010). 文化因素影响创造力的实证研究. 社会科学论坛,(8), 4-12.
[12] 叶仁敏, 洪德厚, 保尔·托兰斯.(1988). 托兰斯创造性思维测验（TTCT）的测试和中西方学生的跨文化比较. 应用心理学, 3(3), 22-29.
[13] 岳晓东.(2001). 两岸四地大学生对创造力特征及创造力人才的认知调查. 心理学报, 33(2), 148-154.
[14] 张文新, 谷传华.(2005). 创造力发展心理学. 合肥: 安徽教育出版社. 283-295.
[15] Cropley, A. J.(1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: general principles. In M. A. Runco(Ed.), The creativity research handbook(vol.1)(84-114). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
[16] Mouchiroud, C., & Bernoussi, A.(2008). An empirical study of the construct validity of social creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 372-380.
[17] Mouchiroud, C., & Lubart, T.(2002). Social creativity: A cross-sectional study of 6-to 11-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(1), 60-69.
[18] Nickerson, R.(1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 393-429). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[19] Panda, M., & Yadava, R.(2005). Implicit creativity theories in India: An exploration. Psychological Studies, 50(1), 32-39.
[20] Peng, K.(1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 9, 741-754.
[21] Niu, W., & Kaufman, J. C.(2013). Creativity of Chinese and American cultures: A synthetic analysis. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41 (7), 77-87.
[22] Torrance, E. P.(1962). Creative development. In E. P. Torrance(Ed.), Guiding creative talent(pp. 84-103). NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[23] Yildirim, O., Acar, A. C., Bull, S., & Sevinc, L.(2008). Relationships between teachers` perceived leadership style, students` learning style, and academic achievement: A study on high school students. Educational Psychology, 28(1), 73-81.
[24] Yue, X. D., & Rudowicz, E.(2002). Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 88-104.