两种空间关系简单句命题表征项目顺序特点*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 296-301.

两种空间关系简单句命题表征项目顺序特点^*

刘海燕^1,2,苏娟^1,3,郝清池¹,阴国恩¹

1 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300074;
2 空军航空大学军事教育训练系，长春 130022;
3 内蒙古财经大学统计与数学学院，呼和浩特 010070

收稿日期:2014-12-20 出版日期:2015-05-20 发布日期:2015-07-03
通讯作者: 阴国恩，E-mail: yinguoen@mail.tjnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
全国教育科学“十二五”规划课题（PLA112093）。

Item Order of Propositional Representation in Understanding Spacial Relation Sentence

Liu Haiyan^1,2,Su Juan^1,3,Hao Qingchi¹,Yin Guoen¹

1 Academy of psychology and behavior, Tianjin normal university, Tianjin 300074;
2 Department of Military Educational Training,Aviation university of Air Force, Changchun 130022;
3 Institute of Mathematics and Statistics,Inner Mongolia of Finance and Economics University, Hohhot 010070

Received:2014-12-20 Online:2015-05-20 Published:2015-07-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用改进后的句子―图形匹配实验，通过视、听通道呈现句子，探讨了中国大学生理解空间关系简单句所形成的命题表征中项目顺序特点。实验结果不支持“结构建造框架理论”中以“先提述参与者”作为表征基础的理论假设，在听觉通道呈现句子的实验中发现了支持优先表征参照客体的证据，当参照客体为“先提述参与者”时会促进个体对句子的理解。

关键词: 空间关系句, 命题表征, 参照客体, 项目顺序。

Abstract: Adopting a sentence-picture verification task technique, this paper describes experiments designed to examine the item order of propositional representations in Chinese readers’ understanding spacial relation of simple sentence by visual and auditory tasks. The experiment result did not support the ″structure built frame theory″which is on the basis of ″participant referenced first″. The result found that the order of propositional representations is referenced object→indicated object in the auditory task. The reaction time for the referenced object in the front of the sentence(A right is B)is shorter than in the rear(A is the left of B).

Key words: spacial relation sentence, propositional representation, reference object, item order.

中图分类号:

B844

刘海燕,苏娟,郝清池,阴国恩. 两种空间关系简单句命题表征项目顺序特点^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 296-301.

Liu Haiyan,Su Juan,Hao Qingchi,Yin Guoen. Item Order of Propositional Representation in Understanding Spacial Relation Sentence[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(3): 296-301.

参考文献

[1] 陈永明.(2013). 言语与智能. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社．
[2] 陈永明, 崔耀.(1994)．句子先提述的参与者在可提取性上的优势现象. 心理学报, 26(2), 113-120．
[3] 张金桥, 莫雷.(2006). 汉语主动句、被动句的命题表征项目顺序特点. 心理学报, 38(3), 317-323.
[4] 周治金, 陈永明, 崔耀.(2001). 指代者对其先行词可提取性的影响. 心理学报, 33(3), 7-12.
[5] Bradley, S. G., & Alan, K.(2006). Visual attention and the semantics of space: Beyond central and peripheral cues. Psychological Science, 17(7), 622-627.
[6] Bradley, S. G., & Gregory, J. D.(2011). Grounding spatial language in the motor system: Reciprocal interactions between spatial semantics and orienting. Visual Cognition, 19(1), 79-116.
[7] Franklin, & Tversky.(1990). Reprinted by permission of the publisher. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
[8] Gernsbacher, M. A.(1985). Surface information loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 324-363.
[9] Gibson, B. S., Scheutz, M., & Davis, G. J.(2009). Symbolic control of visual attention: semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 71(2), 363-374.
[10] Ginette, B., & Ross, P.(2001). The mental representation and processes of spatial deductive reasoning with diagrams and sentences. International Journal of Psychology, 36(1), 42-52.
[11] Jiang, Y. V., Won, B. Y., & Swallow, K. M.(2014). Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1346-1357.
[12] Judith, B., Mark, B., & Michael, S.(2010). Language and spatial reorientation: Evidence from severe aphasia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 646-658.
[13] Kelleher, J. D., Ross, R. J., Sloan, C., & Namee, B. M.(2011). The effect of occlusion on the semantics of projective spatial terms: a case study in grounding language in perception. Cognitive Processing, 12, 95-108.
[14] Klaus, O., & Oliver, W.(2000). Effects of directionality in deductive reasoning: the comprehension of single relational premises. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(6), 1702-1712.
[15] Li, J.(2012). Different spatial terms in navigation system for Chinese drivers. Cognitive Processing, 13(1), 229-232．
[16] Lipinski, J., Spencer, J. P., & Samuelson, L. K.(2010). Corresponding delay-dependent biases in spatial language and spatial memory. Psychological research, 74(3), 337-351.
[17] Logan, G. D.(1994). Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations． Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1015-1036.
[18] Marco, R., & Markus, K.(2013). A theory and a computational model of spatial reasoning with preferred mental models. Psychological Review, 120(3), 561-588.
[19] Markus, K., Leandra, B., Antje, K., & Jelica, N.(2013). Spatial belief revision. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 147-156.
[20] Ray, J.(2012). Language as a source of evidence for theories of spatial representation. Perception, 41, 1128-1152.
[21] Vergauwe, E., Camos, V., & Barrouillet, P.(2014). The impact of storage on processing: how is information maintained in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 1072-1095.
[22] Von Ekhardt, B., & Potter, M. C.(1985). Clauses and the semantic representation of words. Memory and Cognition, 13(4), 371-376.