评价者与被评价者的社会阶层对阶层刻板印象的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4): 511-515.

评价者与被评价者的社会阶层对阶层刻板印象的影响

周春燕¹, 黄海¹, 刘陈陵¹, 郭永玉², 贺金波²

1 中国地质大学武汉应用心理学研究所，武汉 430074;
2 华中师范大学心理学院，武汉 430079

收稿日期:2014-06-10 出版日期:2015-07-20 发布日期:2015-07-30
通讯作者: 郭永玉
基金资助:
(DXS20140025)。

The Effect of Social Class on Stereotype Based on Stereotype Content Model

Zhou Chunyan¹, Huang Hai¹, Liu Chenling¹, GuoYongyu², He Jinbo²

1 Institute of Applied Psychology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074;
2 School of Psychology, Central China Normal University Wuhan 430079

Received:2014-06-10 Online:2015-07-20 Published:2015-07-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨社会阶层对刻板印象的影响，选取客观上处于相对高阶层的被试108名和处于相对低阶层的被试99名，请被试对当前中国社会中的典型高低阶层群体进行提名，并对两个群体进行能力-热情-道德三维度的评分。结果发现：（1）被评价者的社会阶层可以预测人们对其形成的刻板印象，高阶层群体被认为是“高能力、低热情、低道德”的，而低阶层群体则被认为是“低能力、高热情、高道德”的。（2）评价者的社会阶层主要影响了能力维度的评价，低阶层被试在能力评价上表现出了对内群体的偏好。整体来看，研究结果支持刻板印象内容模型的社会阶层假设。

关键词: 社会阶层, 刻板印象, 内容模型, 内群体偏好。

Abstract: In order to examined the ″class=competence″ hypothesis and ingroup favoritism hypothesis of Stereotype Content Model(SCM), 108 typical high class individuals and 99 typical low class individuals were chosen as participants. They were required to write at least three groups which they thought was typical high class and typical low class in current china society, then make the ratings on how competent\warm\honest these groups were, using 5-point scales. The results showed that: as SCM predicted, high class groups were regarded as more competent, less friendly, and less honest than low class groups. While subjects′ social class mainly affected the rating on competence, and lower class subjects showed ingroup favoritism on competence ratings, Overall, findings supported the ″class=competence″ hypothesis.

Key words: social class, stereotype, stereotype content model, ingroup favoritism.

中图分类号:

B849：C91

周春燕, 黄海, 刘陈陵, 郭永玉, 贺金波. 评价者与被评价者的社会阶层对阶层刻板印象的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 511-515.

Zhou Chunyan, Huang Hai, Liu Chenling, GuoYongyu, He Jinbo. The Effect of Social Class on Stereotype Based on Stereotype Content Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(4): 511-515.

参考文献

[1] 高明华.(2010). 刻板印象内容模型的修正与发展. 社会,(5), 193-216.
[2] 管健.(2009). 刻板印象从内容模型到系统模型的发展与应用. 心理科学进展, 17(4), 845-851.
[3] 管健.(2010). “弱势心态”蔓延: 矫情还是憋屈. 人民论坛, (12), 22-23.
[4] 郭永玉, 周春燕.(2014). 公正世界信念对低社会阶层的双重作用. 西南大学学报: 社会科学版, 40(1), 63-67.
[5] 胡小勇, 李静, 芦学璋, 郭永玉.(2014). 社会阶层的心理学研究: 社会认知视角. 心理科学, 37（6）, 1509-1517.
[6] 李培林.(2005). 社会冲突与阶级意识当代中国社会矛盾研究. 社会, 1(7), 7-27.
[7] 李琼, 刘力.(2011). 低地位群体的外群体偏好. 心理科学进展, 19(7), 1061-1068.
[8] 梁明明, 李晔, 李薇娜.(2010). 制度正当化理论述评. 心理科学进展, 11, 1771-1781.
[9] 刘峰, 佐斌.(2013). 源监测框架下阶层刻板印象驱动的错误记忆. 心理学报, 45(11), 1261-1273.
[10] 陆学艺.(2002). 当代中国社会十大阶层分析. 学习与实践,(3), 55-63.
[11] 陆学艺.(2004). 当代中国社会流动 (Vol. 7): 社会科学文献出版社.
[12] Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P.(2007). The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631-648.
[13] Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P.(2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61-149.
[14] Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. P., ... & Sleebos, E. P.(2009). Is the stereotype content model culture-bound? A cross-cultural comparison reveals systematic similarities and differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33.
[15] Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J.(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902.
[16] Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A.(2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious blosting of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
[17] Kraus, M. W., Cté, S., & Keltner, D.(2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716-1723.
[18] Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D.(2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor. Psychological review, 119(3), 546-572.
[19] Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M.(2007). Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234-249.
[20] Mahalingam, R.(2003). Essentialism, culture, and power: Representations of social class. Journal of Social Issues, 59(4), 733-749.
[21] Mahalingam, R.(2007). Essentialism, power, and the representation of social categories: A folk sociology perspective. Human Development, 50(6), 300-319.
[22] Oldmeadow, J., & Fiske, S. T.(2007). System‐justifying ideologies moderate status= competence stereotypes: roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1135-1148.
[23] Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., C?觝té, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D.(2010). Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771-784.
[24] Wojciszke, B.(2005). Morality and competence in person-and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 155-188.