双文化经验对整体加工方式的影响*

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 已有研究表明,与个体主义文化相比,集体主义文化易引发整体加工方式。但是,文化不仅可以按照东西方文化划分为个体主义和集体主义,还可以依据个体的文化经验划分为多元文化和单一文化。那么,与单一文化经验相比,多元文化经验,尤其是最常见的双文化经验是否也有利于整体加工方式呢?在两个实验中,我们将被试分为两组,让其中一组被试暴露在双文化情境下,另外一组被试暴露在单一文化情境下。然后让这两组被试要么寻找两段视频间的相似点或者差异点（实验1）,要么回忆与老年人刻板印象一致或不一致的信息（实验2）。结果发现,与暴露在单一文化情境下相比,暴露在双文化情境下的被试倾向于寻找事物间的相似点（实验1）,并且不易形成刻板印象（实验2）。这表明,双文化经验有利于整体加工方式。

关键词: 整体加工方式, 局部加工方式, 加工方式, 双文化经验。

Abstract: Studies have shown that, compared to individualistic cultures, collectivistic cultures could facilitate global processing. However, cultural experience can be divided not only into individualist and collectivist according to Eastern and Western cultures but also into multicultural and monocultural according to individuals′ experiences. Compared to monocultural experiences, are multicultural experiences, especially, the most common bicultural experience more conducive to the global processing style? To address this question, we conducted two experiments in which participants were divided into two groups, one exposed to a bicultural experience and another exposed to a monocultural experience. The two groups were either required to search for similarities or differences between two videos(Experiment 1), or recall the information congruent or incongruent with older adult stereotypes(Experiment 2). The experimental results showed that, compared to the participants exposed to a monocultural experience, those exposed to a bicultural experience tended to search for similarities among the objects(Experiment 1)and were not prone to have stereotype impressions(Experiment 2). This indicates that individuals with bicultural experiences facilitate the global processing style.

Key words: global processing style, local processing style, processing styles, bicultural experiences.

万明钢，杨阳李建升，蒋慧. 双文化经验对整体加工方式的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 1-6.

Wan Minggang, Yang Yang, Li Jiansheng, Jiang Hui. Bicultural Experience Facilitates the Global Processing Style[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(1): 1-6.

参考文献

1 高承海, 侯玲, 万明钢.(2014). 民族接触促进跨民族互动的心理机制. 西北师大学报, 51(6), 30-35.
2 李森森, 龙长权, 陈庆飞, 李红.(2010). 群际接触理论——一种改善群际关系的理论. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 831-839.
3 Bos, M. W., & Dijksterhuis, A.(2011). Unconscious thought works bottom-up and conscious thought works top-down when forming an impression. Social and Cognition. 29(6), 727-736.
4 Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B.(2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 501-520.
5 Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K.(2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 5-21.
6 Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M.(1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama(Eds.), Heart′s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention(pp. 167-196). New York: Academic Press.
7 Dijksterhuis, A.(2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 586-598.
8 F?觟rster, J.(2009). Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: How global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 88-111.
9 F?觟ster, J.(2012). GLOMOsys: How and Why of Global and Local Processing. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 21(1), 15-19. F?觟rster, J., & Denzler, M.(2012). Sense creative! The impact of global and local vision, hearing, touching, tasting, and smelling on creative and analytic thought. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 108-117.
10 F?觟rster, J., & Higgins, E. T.(2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16(8), 631-636.
11 F?觟rster, J., Liberman, N., & Kuschel, S.(2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholoy, 94(4), 579-599.
12 F?觟rster, J., Liberman, N., & Shapira, O.(2009). Preparing for novel versus familiar events: Shifts in global and local processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 138(3), 383-399.
13 F?觟rster, J., Marguc, J., & Gillebaart, M.(2010). Novelty categorization theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 736-755.
14 Friedman, R. S., & F?觟rster, J.(2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 477-492.
15 Friedman, R. S., Fishbach, A., F?觟rster, J., & Werth, L.(2003). Attentional priming effects on creativity. Creativity Research Journa, 15(2-3), 277-286.
16 Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Rust, M. C., Nier, J., Banker, B., Ward, C. M., Mottola, G. R., Houlette, M.(1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 388-402.
17 Gasper, K.(2004). Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing. Cognition and Emotion, 18(3), 405-421.
18 Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L.(2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(1), 34-40.
19 Hastie, R., & Kumar, P. A.(1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 25-38.
20 Kühnen, U., Hannover, B., & Schubert, B.(2001). The semantic-procedural interface model of the self: The role of self-knowledge for context-dependent versus context-independent modes of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 397-409.
21 Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D.(2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(5), 492-499.
22 Leung, A. K. Y., & Chiu, C. Y.(2010). Multicultural experience, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(5-6), 723-741.
23 Leung, A. K. Y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. Y.(2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63(3), 169-181.
24 Maddux, W. W., Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D.(2010). When in Rome... Learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 731-741.
25 Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D.(2009). Cultural borders and mental barriers: the relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1047-1061.
26 Mikulincer, M., Kedem, P., & Paz, D.(1990). The impact of trait anxiety and situational stress on the categorization of natural objects. Anxiety Research, 2(2), 85-101.
27 Pettigrew, T. F.(1998). Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65-85.
28 Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R.(2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922-934.
29 Schwarz, N., & Bless, H.(2007). Mental construal processes: The inclusion/exclusion model. In D. Stapel, and J. Suls(Eds.), Assimilation and contrast in social psychology(pp. 119-141). PA: Psychology Press.
30 Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y.(2006). You focus on the forest when you′re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578-596.
31 Tadmor, C. T., Hong, Y. Y., Chao, M. M., Wiruchnipawan, F., & Wang, W.(2012). Multicultural experiences reduce intergroup bias through epistemic unfreezing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 750-772.
32 Tadmor, C. T., & Tetlock, P. E.(2006). Biculturalism: A Model of the Effects of Second-Culture Exposure on Acculturation and Integrative Complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(2), 173-190.
33 Tadmor, C. T., Tetlock, P. E., & Peng, K.(2009). Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity the cognitive implications of biculturalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 105-139.
34 Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Kwiatkowski, J.(2007). Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1470-1480.
35 Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A.(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
36 Xu, X., Zuo, X., Wang, X., & Han, S.(2009). Do you feel mypain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(26), 8525-8529.

双文化经验对整体加工方式的影响^*

Bicultural Experience Facilitates the Global Processing Style

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价