高焦虑个体对威胁性刺激的注意偏向特点*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 760-764.

高焦虑个体对威胁性刺激的注意偏向特点^*

毋嫘^1,2,林冰心^1,2,蒋娜^1,2,赵亚萍^1,2

1 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300074
2 国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心，天津 300074

收稿日期:2016-03-29 出版日期:2016-12-20 发布日期:2016-12-28
通讯作者: 毋嫘，E-mail: wulei_1983@126.com。
基金资助:
天津市哲学社会科学规划项目（TJJX13-007）。

Features of Attentional Bias to Threatening Information in Trait-Anxious Individuals

Wu Lei^1,2, Lin Bingxin^1,2, Jiang Na^1,2, Zhao Yaping^1,2

1 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300074;
2 Center of Collaborative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of Mental Health, Tianjin 300074

Received:2016-03-29 Online:2016-12-20 Published:2016-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用点探测实验范式，将图片按照威胁性分为高威胁性和一般威胁性，探讨焦虑程度不同的个体对不同威胁性刺激的注意特点。采用状态-特质焦虑问卷从265个大学生中选取了33名高焦虑被试和31名对照组被试。结果发现：（1）高焦虑组个体对一般威胁性刺激有显著注意偏向，对高威胁性刺激有注意回避趋势；（2）对照组个体对一般威胁性刺激没有表现出注意偏向，对高威胁刺激有注意偏向趋势。结论：（1）即使是一般威胁性图片也能引起高焦虑被试的注意偏向（2）高威胁性图片才能引起对照组个体产生注意偏向的趋势。

关键词: 特质焦虑, 点探测, 注意偏向, 注意回避

Abstract: High-trait-anxiety individuals' attentional bias to threatening stimuli is related to threat intensity. The study aimed to investigate attentional bias of trait-anxiety individuals toward stimuli with different threat intensity. 33 high-trait-anxiety individuals and 31 control-group individuals were selected from 265 university students. The results showed that: 1)high-trait-anxiety individuals in the face of mildly threatening stimuli showed significantly longer response latencies than control-group individuals when points probe the neutral pictures relative to threatening pictures; 2)high-trait-anxiety individuals in the face of highly threatening stimuli showed shorter response latencies when points probe the neutral pictures relative to threatening pictures. The conclusions were that: 1)high-trait-anxiety individuals had attentional bias to mildly threatening stimuli but attentional avoidance to highly threatening stimuli; 2)control-group individuals had attentional bias to highly threatening stimuli but no to mildly threatening stimuli.

Key words: trait-anxiety, dot-probe, attentional bias, attentional avoidance

中图分类号:

B849

毋嫘,林冰心,蒋娜,赵亚萍. 高焦虑个体对威胁性刺激的注意偏向特点^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 760-764.

Wu Lei, Lin Bingxin, Jiang Na, Zhao Yaping. Features of Attentional Bias to Threatening Information in Trait-Anxious Individuals[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(6): 760-764.

参考文献

白露, 马慧, 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉.(2006). 中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19, 719-722.
董云英, 张小聪, 周仁来.(2015). 考试焦虑者对不同程度威胁刺激的注意偏向. 中国临床心理杂志, 23, 954-958.
甘淑珍, 李国瑞.(2010). 非临床社交焦虑个体的注意偏向特征—以词语和面孔表情为刺激材料的实验研究. 心理科学, 33, 729-731.
Bantin, T., Stevens, S., Gerlach, A. L., & Hermann, C.(2015). What does the facial dot-probe task tell us about attentional processes in social anxiety? a systematic review. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 50, 40-51.
Basten, U., Stelzel, C., & Fiebach, C. J.(2011). Trait anxiety modulates the neural efficiency of inhibitory control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3132-3145.
Koster, E. H., Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., & Van Damme, S.(2005). Time-course of attention for threatening pictures in high and low trait anxiety. Behaviour research and therapy, 43(8), 1087-1098.
MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A.(1988). Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 40(4), 653-670.
Marsh, A. A., Ambady, N., & Kleck, R. E.(2005). The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach-and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion, 5(1), 119.
Mathews, A.(1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. Behaviour research and therapy, 28(6), 455-468.
Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C.(2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 16(3), 331-354.
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P.(1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour research and therapy, 36(9), 809-848.
Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., De Bono, J., & Painter, M.(1997). Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety. Behaviour research and therapy, 35(4), 297-303.
Salemink, E., van den Hout, M. A., & Kindt, M.(2007). Selective attention and threat: Quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task. Behaviour research and therapy, 45(3), 607-615.
Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A.(1988). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester, U. K.: John Wiley & Sons.
Wirth, B. E., & Wentura, D.(2015). The influence of teeth-exposure on attentional bias to angry faces in the dot-probe task. European Conference on Visual Perception.

[1]	焦江丽, 刘毅, 闻素霞. 中英双语者情绪注意偏向中的双语优势效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 590-595.
[2]	于永菊. 焦虑和抑郁对正负性注意偏向的影响：注意控制的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 121-127.
[3]	贾丽萍, 卢国华, 宋玉萍, 李福洪. 负性情绪启动对特质焦虑个体行为抑制的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 604-612.
[4]	耿靖宇, 侯晓, 杨华勇, 韩丕国, 高峰强, 韩磊. 特质焦虑与大学生拖延行为的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 402-407.
[5]	张丽华, 李娜, 刘婕, 代嘉幸. 情绪启动对低自尊个体注意偏向的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 763-770.
[6]	梁丽美, 李佳根, 贾江晓, 宋海秀, 雷怡, 李红, 张文海. 不同性质的评价对特质焦虑者抑制功能影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 335-341.
[7]	赵偲,高雪梅,周群,翁蕾. 暴力电子游戏玩家对攻击性图片注意偏向的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 584-590.
[8]	张丽华, 施国春, 张一鸣. 脆弱型高自尊高中生攻击性线索注意偏向^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 36-41.
[9]	聂衍刚,刘莉,曾燕玲,宁志军. 道德自我对利己和利他行为倾向的注意偏向*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(5): 678-683.
[10]	石国兴, 赵海第. 高特质焦虑高中生对消极信息的注意和记忆偏向[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 495-499.
[11]	杨金科, 肖玉琴, 杨波. 暴力犯攻击行为与焦虑的关系：CU特质的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 283-287.
[12]	张玉柱,金盛华. 高校教师职业幸福感的结构与测量[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 629-634.
[13]	张敏；卢家楣. 青少年负性情绪信息注意偏向的情绪弹性和性别效应[J]. , 2013, 11(1): 61-64.
[14]	陶云；张莎；唐立；刘艳. 不同心理弹性大学生在有或无应激情景下的注意偏向特点[J]. , 2012, 10(3): 196-201.
[15]	刘溪梁宝勇. 心算应激与特质焦虑、应对风格的关系[J]. , 2008, 6(1): 30-37.