“善待宽恕者”还是“报复非宽恕者”：基于博弈范式对冒犯者得到宽恕以后行为动机的研究*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3): 323-328.

“善待宽恕者”还是“报复非宽恕者”：基于博弈范式对冒犯者得到宽恕以后行为动机的研究^*

张田, 傅宏, 朱婷婷

南京理工大学社会学系,南京 210098
南京师范大学心理学院,南京 210024
南京医科大学心理健康教育与研究中心,南京 210029

收稿日期:2016-07-05 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2017-06-08
通讯作者: 傅宏,E-mail：fuhong@njnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家社科基金青年项目（14CSHO73）、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（AE15001_13）和南京理工大学科研启动金项目（AE89991）

Reward Forgiveness or Punish Unforgiveness: A Game Experiment of Offenders' Motivation of the Behavior Follow the Forgiveness

Zhang Tian, Fu Hong, Zhu Tingting

Department of Sociology, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210098;
School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210024;
Mental Health Education and Research Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029

Received:2016-07-05 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2017-06-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近期国内外研究比较一致地认为冒犯者在得到宽恕后,不倾向于再次伤害被冒犯者。但这些研究并未解释冒犯者为什么这么做,是出于“善待宽恕者”的动机,还是出于“报复非宽恕者”的动机。为此,本研究通过囚徒困境的博弈范式研究了冒犯者得到宽恕以后的行为动机。结果显示,在“得到宽恕”的情境中,冒犯者善待对方的程度要显著高于“没有得到宽恕”和“不确定是否得到宽恕”的情境,而后两者之间没有显著差异。该结果一方面进一步验证了冒犯者得到宽恕以后不倾向于再次伤害对方的结论,另一方面也初步确定了冒犯者得到宽恕以后行为的动机,即“善待宽恕者”,而非“报复非宽恕者”,并对人际互动具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 宽恕, 后续行为, 行为动机, 博弈范式

Abstract: Some recent studies show that expression of forgiveness generally serves to deter rather than invite repeated offenses. But one question that remained after these studies was why offenders choose to do like this. Did them reward forgiveness or punish unforgiveness? To explore offenders' motivation of the behavior follow the forgiveness, a prisoners' dilemma game was used in this study. And the results suggest that no matter the information was unforgiveness or neutral message, the participants would encourage repeat offenses, only when the participants receive a forgiveness message, that would deter repeat offenses. That means offenders are indeed responding favorably to forgiveness, and not just punishing the angry player. In addition, this result verifies once again that expressions of forgiveness generally serve to deter rather than invite repeat offenses, and also is a reference to interpersonal interaction.

Key words: forgiveness, behavior after forgiveness, motivation of behavior, game experiment

中图分类号:

B848.4

张田, 傅宏, 朱婷婷. “善待宽恕者”还是“报复非宽恕者”：基于博弈范式对冒犯者得到宽恕以后行为动机的研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 323-328.

Zhang Tian, Fu Hong, Zhu Tingting. Reward Forgiveness or Punish Unforgiveness: A Game Experiment of Offenders' Motivation of the Behavior Follow the Forgiveness[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(3): 323-328.

参考文献

1 叶浩生.(2004). 文化模式及其对心理与行为的影响. 心理科学, 27(5), 1032-1036.
2 张田.(2015). “得寸进尺”还是“适可而止”: 基于博弈范式对冒犯者得到宽恕以后行为的研究.(博士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
3 张田, 丁雪辰, 翁晶, 傅宏, 薛艳.(2014). “得寸进尺”还是“适可而止”: 基于冒犯者角度对宽恕结果的讨论. 心理科学进展, 22(1), 104-111.
4 张田, 傅宏.(2016). 得到宽恕与否对冒犯者后续行为的影响: 内疚与共情的作用. 心理与行为研究, 14(1), 100-105.
5 张田, 傅宏, 薛艳.(2016). “得寸进尺”还是“适可而止”: 冒犯者得到宽恕以后的行为. 心理科学, 39(1), 116-123.
6 Cialdini, R. B.(1993). Influence: Science and practice(3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
7 Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F.(2000). Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers. In M. McCullough, K. Pargament, & C. Thoresen(Eds.), Forgiveness(pp. 133-155). New York: Guilford.
8 Fu, H., Watkins, D., & Hui, E. K. P.(2004). Personality correlates of the disposition towards interpersonal forgiveness: A Chinese perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 305-316.
9 Goldberg, L. R.(1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
10 Hui, E. K. P., & Chau, T. S.(2009). The impact of a forgiveness intervention with Hong Kong Chinese children hurt in interpersonal relationship. British Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 37(37), 141-156.
11 Karremans, J. C., Van Lange, P. A., Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Kluwer, E. S.(2003). When forgiving enhances psychological well-being: the role of interpersonal commitment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84(5), 1011-1026.
12 McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. A.(2002). The grateful disposition: a conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112.
13 McNulty, J. K.(2008). Forgiveness in marriage: putting the benefits into context. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(1), 171.
14 McNulty, J. K.(2010). Forgiveness increases the likelihood of subsequent partner transgressions in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(6), 787.
15 McNulty, J. K.(2011). The dark side of forgiveness: The tendency to forgive predicts continued psychological and physical aggression in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 770-783.
16 Soman, D., & John, G.(2001). Transaction decoupling: How price bundling affects the decision to consume. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 30-44.
17 Tabak, B. A., McCullough, M. E., Luna, L. R., Bono, G., & Berry, J. W.(2012). Conciliatory Gestures Facilitate Forgiveness and Feelings of Friendship by Making Transgressors Appear More Agreeable. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 503-536.
18 Vanoyen, W. C., Ludwig, T. E., & Vander Laan, K. L.(2001). Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges: implications for emotion, physiology, and health. Psychological Science, 12(2), 117-123.
19 Wallace, H. M., Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F.(2008). Interpersonal consequences of forgiveness: Does forgiveness deter or encourage repeat offenses? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 453-460.
20 Worthington, E. L., Jr.(Ed.).(2005). Handbook of forgiveness. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
21 Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Scherer, M.(2004). Forgiveness is an emotion-focused coping strategy that can reduce health risks and promote health resilience: Theory, review, and hypotheses. Psychology and Health, 19(3), 385-405.

[1]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[2]	孙卉, 张田. 宽恕干预对降低农村留守儿童拒绝敏感性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 111-117.
[3]	张田, 傅宏. “对不起”有用吗：道歉对群际宽恕的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 119-125.
[4]	孙卉, 张田, 傅宏. 团体宽恕干预在恋爱受挫群体中的运用及其对大学生心理健康教育的启示[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 541-548.
[5]	赵彦凯, 李晖, 吴真, 张珊珊. 认知抑制与人际宽恕：特质宽恕的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 531-536.
[6]	张田, 傅宏. 得到宽恕与否对冒犯者后续行为的影响：内疚与共情的作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 100-105.
[7]	张田，傅宏. 大学生的恋爱宽恕:问卷编制与特点研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(2): 220-225.