权力、任务框架对自我和为他人决策时风险偏好的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用情境回忆任务启动被试的权力,并引入收益和损失两种任务框架,综合考察权力高低、任务框架对自我决策和为他人决策时风险偏好的影响。结果表明：（1）在为他人决策中,启动高权力被试有更强的风险偏好,而自我决策中,高、低权力启动组被试风险偏好上无显著差异;（2）在为他人决策中,被试在收益框架和损失框架下的风险偏好差异不显著,而在自我决策中,损失框架下的风险偏好显著高于收益框架;（3）低权力启动的被试,在损失框架下,为他人决策的风险偏好要小于自我决策,而在收益框架下差异不显著;高权力启动的被试无论在收益框架还是损失框架,自我-他人风险决策都不存在显著差异。

关键词: 权力, 任务框架, 决策者角色, 风险偏好

Abstract: The study aimed to explore the effect of power and task frame on risk preference of self-other decision making. Undergraduate subjects primed with high or low power were asked to either make decisions for themselves or make decisions for others on a risk preference task under gain or loss task frameworks. The results showed that: 1)In making decision for others, subjects primed with high power performed stronger risk preference, but in making decision for themselves, there were no differences between high power primed group and low power primed group; 2)in making decision for others, subjects' risk preferences between gain frames and loss frames had no significant differences, but in making decision for themselves, the subjects' risk preference under loss frames is stronger than gain frames; 3)subjects primed with low power showed stronger risk preference in making decision for themselves than making decision for others under loss frames, but showed no significant differences under gain frames; no matter in gain frames or in loss frames, subjects primed with high power showed no significant differences in self-other risk decision.

Key words: power, task frames, the decision maker' roles, risk preferences

中图分类号:

B842.5

云祥, 李小平. 权力、任务框架对自我和为他人决策时风险偏好的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 417-423.

Yun Xiang, Li Xiaoping. The Effects of Power and Task Frames on Risk Preferences in Making Decision for Self and Making Decision for Others[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(3): 417-423.

参考文献

1 段婧, 刘永芳, 何琪.(2012). 决策者角色及相关变量对风险偏好的影响. 心理学报, 44(3), 369-376.
2 段锦云, 朱月龙, 陈婧.(2013). 心理距离对风险决策框架效应的影响. 心理科学, 36(6), 1404-1407.
3 刘永芳, 毕玉芳, 王怀勇.(2010). 情绪和任务框架对自我和预期他人决策时风险偏好的影响. 心理学报, 42(3), 317-324.
4 刘永芳, 王鹏, 庄锦英, 钟俊, 孙庆洲, 刘毅.(2014). 自我-他人决策差异: 问题,研究与思路. 心理科学进展, 22(4), 580-587
5 宋广文, 夏星星, 李承宗, 何云凤.(2012). 时间距离、封面故事和概率对框架效应的影响. 心理学报, 44(7), 957-963.
6 徐惊蛰, 谢晓非.(2011). 解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异. 心理学报, 43(1), 11-20.
7 张慧, 陆静怡, 谢晓非.(2014). 解释水平导致的自己-他人决策差异. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 50(6), 1124-1132.
8 赵秋荻, 刘永芳, 段婧, 徐沙.(2013). 心理距离与决策者角色对风险决策的影响. 应用心理学, 19(1), 26-33.
9 钟毅平, 申娟, 吴坤.(2009). 风险决策任务中时间距离对框架效应的影响. 心理科学, 32(4), 920-922.
10 Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D.(2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
11 Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A.(2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187.
12 Fast, N. J., Sivanathan, N., Mayer, N. D., & Galinsky, A. D.(2012). Power and overconfident decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 249-260.
13 Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C..(2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453-466.
14 Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H.(2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068-1074.
15 Guinote, A.(2007). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 685-697.
16 Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U.(1997). A fundamental prediction error: Self-others discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 45-53.
17 Inesi, M. E.(2010) Power and Loss Aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(1), 58-69.
18 Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. Journal of the Econometric Society, 263-291.
19 Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C.(2003). Power, approach and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
20 Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S.(2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 282-290.
21 Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D.(2010). Power increases hypocrisy moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21(5), 737-744.
22 Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A.(2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1543-1548.
23 Lee, F., & Tiedens, L. Z.(2001). Is it lonely at the top?: The independence and interdependence of power holders. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 43-91.
24 Li, J., & Tang, Y. I.(2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45-68.
25 Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C.(2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113-117.
26 Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N.(2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others′ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1256-1269.
27 Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K.(2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 158-186.
28 Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 451-462.
29 McElroy, T., & Mascari, D.(2007). When is it going to happen? How temporal distance influences processing for risky-choice framing tasks. Social Cognition, 25(4), 495-517.
30 Palmer, E. C.(2014). Self-other differences in risky decision making: An analysis of social values theory and construal-level theory(Doctoral dissertation)Wake Forest University.
31 Polman, E.(2012). Self-other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), 141-150.
32 Polman, E., & Emich, K. J.(2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 492-501.
33 Ronay, R., & von Hippel, W.(2010). Power, testosterone, and risk-taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(5), 473-482.
34 Smith, P. K., & Bargh, J. A.(2008). Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Social Cognition, 26(1), 1-24.
35 Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y.(2006). You focus on the forest when you′re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578-596.
36 Sturm, R. E., & Antonakis, J.(2015). Interpersonal power a review, critique, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 136-163.
37 Trope, Y., & Liberman, N.(2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.
38 Trope, Y., & Liberman, N.(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.

[1]	贺晓玲, 刘奕晴, 那琳娜. 3～5岁幼儿颜色映射道德和权力概念的认知发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 636-641.
[2]	贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.
[3]	云祥. 权力感对道德困境判断的影响：基于CNI模型的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 544-551.
[4]	赵申苒, 康萌萌, 王明辉, 彭翠. 仁慈领导对员工亲环境行为的影响：上下属关系与权力距离的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 819-826.
[5]	李宗波, 王明辉. 威权领导对员工沉默行为的影响:一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 713-719.
[6]	任玉冰, 杜秀芳. 心理距离与后果严重性对人身安全决策的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 327-334.
[7]	孙冬青, 傅鑫媛, 辛自强. 信任者权力对其人际信任的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 139-144.
[8]	徐悦, 段锦云, 李成艳. 仁慈领导对员工建言的影响：自我预防和自我提升的双重路径[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 839-845.
[9]	徐梦,李小平. 组织不公平与反生产行为的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 282-288.
[10]	李亚强,陈朝阳,苏永强,杨琳琳,杨勇. 权力对观点采择的影响：权力动机的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 399-405.
[11]	王垚, 李小平. 不同人际关系取向下的权力对利他行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 516-520.
[12]	云祥，李小平. 权力感的无意识启动:方法研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 315-320.
[13]	王青春；阴国恩；张善霞；姚姝君. 青少年决策中的风险选择框架效应[J]. , 2011, 9(4): 268-272.
[14]	李艾丽莎,；胡竹菁；张庆林4. 决策权力和社会角色对混合动机冲突决策的影响[J]. , 2011, 9(2): 115-119.
[15]	焦璨, 张敏强, 吴利, 纪薇. 多元动机网格测验（MMG-S）中文版的修订报告[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(1): 49-53.