信任者权力对其人际信任的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 信任者权力对其人际信任的影响是基于双方权力的不对等实现的还是取决于信任者自身的权力水平的问题值得研究。为此，本研究在实验一中考查了信任博弈任务中信任者的权力感（与被信任者的权力水平无关）对其人际信任的影响，在实验二中通过角色扮演任务操纵信任者与被信任者的权力关系（对等vs.不对等），同时测量信任者的人际信任倾向。结果表明：信任者自身的权力感影响其人际信任，低权力感个体比高权力感个体更信任他人；双方权力对等与否对信任者的人际信任倾向没有影响。可见，信任者权力更多是作为信任者自身的属性特征影响其人际信任，而不以双方权力层级不对等为前提。

关键词: 权力, 人际信任, 信任博弈, 动机认知观点

Abstract: How does the trustor's power affect his interpersonal trust? Is it based on the power differential between the two parties or just on the power of the trustor? This is a question worthy of studying. Therefore, in Study 1, we tested the impact of trustors' sense of power (regardless of the power levels of trustees) on their interpersonal trust by the trust game. Then we manipulated the power levels of both trustors and trustees (power symmetry vs. power asymmetry) through a one-shot typing service scenario and measured the trustors' interpersonal trust in Study 2. The results confirmed that the power of the trustors affected their interpersonal trust, with the individuals holding lower power having more trust than those with higher power; and in both power symmetry and power asymmetry condition, the trustors had the same level of interpersonal trust. The findings indicated that the trustor's power affected his interpersonal trust as a personal trait/state rather than a relationship-specific construct.

Key words: power, interpersonal trust, trust game, motivated cognition account

中图分类号:

B849
C91

孙冬青, 傅鑫媛, 辛自强. 信任者权力对其人际信任的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 139-144.

SUN Dongqing, FU Xinyuan, XIN Ziqiang. Effect of Trustor's Power on Interpersonal Trust[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(1): 139-144.

参考文献

乐国安, 韩振华. (2009). 信任的心理学研究与展望. 西南大学学报:社会科学版, 35(2), 1-5.
王雪, 蔡頠, 孙嘉卿, 吴嵩, 封子奇, 金盛华. (2014). 社会心理学视角下权力理论的发展与比较. 心理科学进展, 22(1), 139-149.
韦庆旺, 俞国良. (2009). 权力的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 17(6), 1336-1343.
谢晓非, 陆静怡. (2014). 风险决策中的双参照点效应. 心理科学进展, 22(4), 571-579.
张建新, 张妙清, 梁觉. (2000). 殊化信任与泛化信任在人际信任行为路径模型中的作用. 心理学报, 32(3), 311-316.
张野, 张珊珊, 崔璐. (2015). 权力感对社会排斥下自我关注的影响. 心理科学, 38(4), 960-965.
Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313-344.
Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place:Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1094-1110.
Bohns, V. K., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012). It hurts when I do this (or you do that):Posture and pain tolerance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 341-345.
Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing:Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1363-1368.
Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173-187.
Cook, K. S. (2005). Networks, norms, and trust:The social psychology of social capital 2004 Cooley mead award address. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 4-14.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people:The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453-466.
Guinote, A. (2007). Behaviour variability and the Situated Focus Theory of Power. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 256-295.
Huang, L., Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2011). Powerful postures versus powerful roles:Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior?. Psychological Science, 22(1), 95-102.
Inesi, M. E., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). How power corrupts relationships:Cynical attributions for others' generous acts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 795-803.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284.
Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Cook, K. S. (2015). Power decreases trust in social exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(42), 12950-12955.
Stein, S. M., & Harper, T. L. (2003). Power, trust, and planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(2), 125-139.
van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., van der Löwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion:Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1315-1322.
Weber, J. M., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2004). Normal acts of irrational trust:Motivated attributions and the trust development process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 75-101.

[1]	贺晓玲, 刘奕晴, 那琳娜. 3～5岁幼儿颜色映射道德和权力概念的认知发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 636-641.
[2]	贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.
[3]	赵君哲, 乔诗绮, 王明辉. 工作场所社交媒体使用对员工工作绩效的影响：基于人际关系视角[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 819-825.
[4]	云祥. 权力感对道德困境判断的影响：基于CNI模型的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 544-551.
[5]	吴鹏, 袁泉, 范晶. 叠音人名的婴儿图式效应及其对人际信任的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 557-563.
[6]	赵申苒, 康萌萌, 王明辉, 彭翠. 仁慈领导对员工亲环境行为的影响：上下属关系与权力距离的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 819-826.
[7]	李宗波, 王明辉. 威权领导对员工沉默行为的影响:一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 713-719.
[8]	董军, 付淑英, 王洋, 李曌宇, 杨绍峰, 齐春辉. 自我控制对大学生人际信任的影响：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 225-230.
[9]	张林, 牟忠琛, 刘燊, 高飞. 社会支持与老年人受骗倾向的关系：一个有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 766-773.
[10]	钟琼瑶, 韩萍, 胡惠云, 吴国来. 高中生父亲在位与社会适应行为的关系：中介与调节作用分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 786-792.
[11]	徐悦, 段锦云, 李成艳. 仁慈领导对员工建言的影响：自我预防和自我提升的双重路径[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 839-845.
[12]	云祥, 李小平. 权力、任务框架对自我和为他人决策时风险偏好的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 417-423.
[13]	徐梦,李小平. 组织不公平与反生产行为的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 282-288.
[14]	李亚强,陈朝阳,苏永强,杨琳琳,杨勇. 权力对观点采择的影响：权力动机的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 399-405.
[15]	王垚, 李小平. 不同人际关系取向下的权力对利他行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 516-520.