威权领导对员工沉默行为的影响:一个有调节的中介效应模型

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5): 713-719.

威权领导对员工沉默行为的影响:一个有调节的中介效应模型

李宗波¹, 王明辉²

1. 中国矿业大学管理学院, 徐州 221116;
2. 河南大学心理与行为研究所, 开封 475004

收稿日期:2017-09-14 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2018-09-19
通讯作者: 王明辉,E-mail:wmhwang@163.com
基金资助:
江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金指导项目（2014SJD412）、中国博士后科学基金面上项目（2014M561731）、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目（2014WB12）和国家社会科学基金项目（13CGL068）

The Impact of Authoritarian Leadership on Employee's Silence Behavior: A Study of a Moderated Mediating Effect

LI Zongbo¹, WANG Minghui²

1. School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116;
2. Institution of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004

Received:2017-09-14 Online:2018-09-20 Published:2018-09-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用249对领导与员工的配对数据，考察了威权领导对员工沉默行为的影响，以及情感信任的中介作用和权力距离的调节效应。结果表明：（1）威权领导对员工沉默行为有正向影响；（2）员工对上司的情感信任在威权领导与沉默行为之间起完全中介作用；（3）员工权力距离导向对威权领导与情感信任之间关系具有调节作用，权力距离导向越高，威权领导对情感信任的影响越低；（4）进一步地，权力距离导向还调节着情感信任对威权领导与沉默行为的中介效应，即存在有调节的中介效应。

关键词: 威权领导, 情感信任, 权力距离, 沉默行为

Abstract: Drawing on 249 dyads of employees and their immediate supervisors, the study attempts to probe the mechanism of the impact of the authoritarian leadership on employees' silence behavior, especially to explore the mediating role of the affect-based trust and the moderating role of the employees' power distance in Chinese organizational context. The results indicate that:1) Authoritarian leadership has a positive effect on employees' silence behavior. 2) Affect-based trust with the supervisor plays a full mediating role between authoritarian leadership and employees' silence behavior. 3) Power distance moderates the relationship between authoritarian leadership and affect-based trust. Specifically, authoritarian leadership is more negatively related to affect-based trust when power distance is high. 4) Power distance moderated the mediating role of affect-based trust in the relationship between authoritarian leadership and employees' silence behavior. That is, the higher the employees' power distance is, the stronger the mediating effect of affect-based trust with the supervisor.

Key words: authoritarian leadership, affect-based trust, power distance, silence behavior

中图分类号:

B849

李宗波, 王明辉. 威权领导对员工沉默行为的影响:一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 713-719.

LI Zongbo, WANG Minghui. The Impact of Authoritarian Leadership on Employee's Silence Behavior: A Study of a Moderated Mediating Effect[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(5): 713-719.

参考文献

蔡松纯, 郑伯埙, 周丽芳, 姜定宇, 郑弘岳. (2009). 领导者上下关系认定与部属利社会行为:权力距离之调节效果. 中华心理学刊, 51(1), 121-138
樊景立, 郑伯埙. (2000). 华人组织的家长式领导:一项文化观点的分析. 本土心理学研究, (13), 127-180
李锐, 田晓明. (2014). 主管威权领导与下属前瞻行为:一个被中介的调节模型构建与检验. 心理学报, 46(11), 1719-1733
吕逸婧, 苏勇. (2015). 真诚型领导能否打破员工沉默?一个有调节的中介模型. 心理科学, 38(5), 1178-1186
于桂兰, 杨术, 孙瑜. (2016). 威权领导、员工沉默行为与员工绩效关系研究. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (5), 77-84
郑伯埙. (1995). 差序格局与华人组织行为. 本土心理学研究, (3), 142-219
郑伯埙, 周丽芳, 黄敏萍, 樊景立, 彭泗清. (2003). 家长式领导的三元模式:中国大陆企业组织的证据. 本土心理学研究, (20), 209-252
郑晓涛, 柯江林, 石金涛, 郑兴山. (2008). 中国背景下员工沉默的测量以及信任对其的影响. 心理学报, 40(2), 219-227
周建涛, 廖建桥. (2012). 为何中国员工偏好沉默——威权领导对员工建言的消极影响. 商业经济与管理, (11), 71-81
Chan, S. C. H., Huang, X., Snape, E., & Lam, C. K. (2013). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders:Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates' organization-based self-esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 108-128.
Daniels, M. A., & Greguras, G. J. (2014). Exploring the nature of power distance:Implications for micro-and macro-level theories, processes, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1202-1229.
Dedahanov, A. T., Lee, D. H., & Rhee, J. (2016). Silence as a mediator between organizational factors and stress. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(8), 1251-1264.
Dedahanov, A. T., & Rhee, J. (2015). Examining the relationships among trust, silence and organizational commitment. Management Decision, 53(8), 1843-1857.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership:Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1-22.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations:Software of the mind. New York:McGrawHill.
Jiang, H. Y., Chen, Y., Sun, P. Z., & Yang, J. (2017). The relationship between authoritarian leadership and employees' deviant workplace behaviors:The mediating effects of psychological contract violation and organizational cynicism. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 732.
Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders:A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744-764.
Lee, D., Choi, Y., Youn, S., & Chun, J. U. (2017). Ethical leadership and employee moral voice:The mediating role of moral efficacy and the moderating role of leader-follower value congruence. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1), 47-57.
Li, Y., & Sun, J. M. (2015). Traditional Chinese leadership and employee voice behavior:A cross-level examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 172-189.
Madrid, H. P., Patterson, M. G., & Leiva, P. I. (2015). Negative core affect and employee silence:How differences in activation, cognitive rumination, and problem-solving demands matter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1887-1898.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence:A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
Morrison, E. W., See, K. E., & Pan, C. (2015). An approach-inhibition model of employee silence:The joint effects of personal sense of power and target openness. Personnel Psychology, 68(3), 547-580.
Ng, K. Y., & Chua, R. Y. J. (2006). Do I contribute more when I trust more? Differential effects of cognition-and affect-based trust. Management and Organization Review, 2(1), 43-66.
Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 863-871.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Employee silence on critical work issues:The cross level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 37-68.
Wang, L., Cheng, M. Y., & Wang, S. (2016). Carrot or stick? The role of in-group/out-group on the multilevel relationship between authoritarian and differential leadership and employee turnover intention (published online). Journal of Business Ethics, 1-16.
Wang, R., & Jiang, J. (2015). How abusive supervisors influence employees' voice and silence:The effects of interactional justice and organizational attribution. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155(3), 204-220.
Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Lam, L. W. (2015). The bad boss takes it all:How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to influence employee silence. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 763-774.
Zhu, Y., & Akhtar, S. (2014). How transformational leadership influences follower helping behavior:The role of trust and prosocial motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 373-392.

[1]	邓颜彦, 郭成. 合作与竞争关系中社会比较对高中生认知信任与情感信任的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 556-562.
[2]	赵申苒, 康萌萌, 王明辉, 彭翠. 仁慈领导对员工亲环境行为的影响：上下属关系与权力距离的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 819-826.
[3]	李宏利, 王星, 董丽娟, 杨岚. 员工创新行为源于领导情感信任吗?风险倾向与组织行为授权的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 701-712.
[4]	徐梦,李小平. 组织不公平与反生产行为的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 282-288.
[5]	柯江林, 吴丹, 孙健敏. 心理资本对工作投入、主观幸福感与沉默行为的影响：交互效应与效应比较*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 804-810.