词汇的唤醒度对情绪标注效应的影响—ERPs研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 31-38.

词汇的唤醒度对情绪标注效应的影响—ERPs研究

岳鹏飞¹, 史梦梦^2,1, 刘旭³, 白学军^4,5,6

1. 信阳师范学院教育科学学院, 信阳 464000;
2. 辽宁师范大学心理学院, 大连 116029;
3. 湖南科技大学教育学院, 湘潭 411201;
4. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300387;
5. 天津师范大学心理学部, 天津 300387;
6. 国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2019-06-10 出版日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-04-07
通讯作者: 岳鹏飞,E-mail:ypf07@126.com;白学军,E-mail:bxuejun@126.com
基金资助:
河南省高等学校青年骨干教师培养计划项目（2018GGJS098）；河南省高等学校哲学社会科学创新团队支持计划（2018-CXTD-04）；河南省社科规划项目（2018BJY025）；教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目（15YJC190027）；信阳师范学院“南湖学者奖励计划”青年项目

Effects of Arousal of Vocabulary on Affect Labeling: An ERPs Study

YUE Pengfei¹, SHI Mengmeng^2,1, LIU Xu³, BAI Xuejun^4,5,6

1. School of Education Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000;
2. College of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029;
3. School of Education, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201;
4. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
5. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
6. Center of Collaborative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of Mental Health, Tianjin 300387

Received:2019-06-10 Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-04-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于晚期阻断理论考察词汇唤醒度对情绪标注效应的影响，研究选择情绪面孔图片为实验材料，借助ERPs技术，以命名后的LPP波幅为指标，考察词汇的唤醒度对情绪标注效应的影响。结果发现：进行情绪标注时，与使用低唤醒度词相比，高唤醒度词条件下的LPP波幅更小；而进行非情绪标注时，差异不显著；无论词的唤醒度高或低，情绪标注与非情绪标注差异显著，情绪标注下LPP波幅更低。结果表明：进行情绪标注时，情绪词唤醒度越高抑制情绪的效果越好，而进行非情绪标注时则无影响；结果支持了晚期阻断理论。

关键词: 情绪标注, 性别标注, 唤醒度, ERPs

Abstract: Based on the disruption theory, the present research conducted an ERP experiment to investigate the effect of the words with different arousal on affect labeling and gender labeling. Given the previous studies, the dependent variable was the late positive potential (LPP) after the affect/gender labeling and negative emotional faces as experimental materials was used. The results showed that the amplitude of LPP was lower especially at the Pz electrode point, when the labels of affect labeling were high arousal words; but the amplitude of LPP had no difference when the labels of gender labeling with different arousal words. In addition, no matter how the arousal of the words was, the difference between affect labeling and gender labeling was significant, and the amplitude of LPP was lower on affect labeling. The results indicate that the higher the arousal of affect labeling words, the better the inhibition effect of emotion; however, the gender labeling can not suppress emotion. The disruption theory has been further confirmed.

Key words: affect labeling, gender labeling, arousal, ERPs

中图分类号:

B845

岳鹏飞, 史梦梦, 刘旭, 白学军. 词汇的唤醒度对情绪标注效应的影响—ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 31-38.

YUE Pengfei, SHI Mengmeng, LIU Xu, BAI Xuejun. Effects of Arousal of Vocabulary on Affect Labeling: An ERPs Study[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(1): 31-38.

参考文献

白学军, 岳鹏飞. (2013). 情绪标注对负性情绪的抑制: 来自自主神经活动的证据. 心理学报, 45(7), 715-724, doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00715
邓欢, 江琦, 马静, 纪婷婷, 朱梦音. (2013). 大学生情绪标签与性别标签加工时程差异的事件相关电位研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 27(10), 796-800, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2013.10.015
龚栩, 黄宇霞, 王妍, 罗跃嘉. (2011). 中国面孔表情图片系统的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 25(1), 40-46, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.01.011
郭晶晶, 吕锦程. (2014). 语言标识对情绪体验的影响. 心理科学, 37(6), 1296-1301
岳鹏飞, 杜婉婉, 白学军, 许远理. (2015). 情绪标注对情绪的抑制发生在何时: 一项ERPs研究. 心理学报, 47(9), 1124-1132, doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01124
岳鹏飞, 杜婉婉, 白学军, 许远理. (2016). 内、外部情绪标注对情绪作用的ERPs研究. 心理发展与教育, 32(6), 649-655, doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.06.02
Brown, S. B. R. E., Steenbergen, H. V., Band, G. P. H., de Rover, M., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012). Functional significance of the emotion-related late positive potential. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 33, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00033.
Burklund, L. J., Craske, M. G., Taylor, S. E., & Lieberman, M. D. (2015). Altered emotion regulation capacity in social phobia as a function of comorbidity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(2), 199-208, doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu058.
Chen, Y., Zhang, D., & Jiang, D. (2018). Effects of directed attention on subsequent processing of emotions: Increased attention to unpleasant pictures occurs in the late positive potential. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1127, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01127.
Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52(2), 95-111, doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00044-7.
Diedrich, O., Naumann, E., Maier, S., & Becker, G. (1997). A frontal positive slow wave in the ERP associated with emotional slides. Journal of Psychophysiology, 11(1), 71-84.
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290-292, doi: 10.1126/science.1089134.
Foti, D., & Hajcak, G. (2008). Deconstructing reappraisal: Descriptions preceding arousing pictures modulate the subsequent neural response. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(6), 977-988, doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20066.
Hajcak, G., MacNamara, A., & Olvet, D. M. (2010). Event-related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation: An integrative review. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(2), 129-155, doi: 10.1080/87565640903526504.
Hajcak, G., Weinberg, A., MacNamara, A., & Foti, D. (2012). ERPs and the study of emotion. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 441-474). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hariri, A. R., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Mazziotta, J. C. (2000). Modulating emotional responses: Effects of a neocortical network on the limbic system. NeuroReport, 11(1), 43-48, doi: 10.1097/00001756-200001170-00009.
Herbert, C., Sfärlea, A., & Blumenthal, T. (2013). Your emotion or mine: Labeling feelings alters emotional face perception-an ERP study on automatic and intentional affect labeling. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 378, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00378.
Kircanski, K., Lieberman, M. D., & Craske, M. G. (2012). Feelings into words: Contributions of language to exposure therapy. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1086-1091, doi: 10.1177/0956797612443830.
Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 199-249, doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80006-5.
Lieberman, M. D., Jarcho, J. M., Berman, S., Naliboff, B. D., Suyenobu, B. Y., Mandelkern, M., & Mayer, E. A. (2004). The neural correlates of placebo effects: A disruption account. NeuroImage, 22(1), 447-455, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.037.
Lieberman, M. D., Hariri, A., Jarcho, J. M., Eisenberger, N. I., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2005). An fMRI investigation of race-related amygdala activity in African-American and Caucasian-American individuals. Nature Neuroscience, 8(6), 720-722, doi: 10.1038/nn1465.
Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H., & Way, B. M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421-428, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.x.
Lieberman, M. D., Inagaki, T. K., Tabibnia, G., & Crockett, M. J. (2011). Subjective responses to emotional stimuli during labeling, reappraisal, and distraction. Emotion, 11(3), 468-480, doi: 10.1037/a0023503.
Memarian, N., Torre, J. B., Haltom, K. E., Stanton, A. L., & Lieberman, M. D. (2017). Neural activity during affect labeling predicts expressive writing effects on well-being: GLM and SVM approaches. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(9), 1437-1447, doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx084.
Monchi, O., Petrides, M., Petre, V., Worsley, K., & Dagher, A. (2001). Wisconsin card sorting revisited: Distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21(19), 7733-7741, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-19-07733.2001.
Niles, A. N., Craske, M. G., Lieberman, M. D., & Hur, C. (2015). Affect labeling enhances exposure effectiveness for public speaking anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 68, 27-36, doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.03.004.
Payer, D. E., Baicy, K., Lieberman, M. D., & London, E. D. (2012). Overlapping neural substrates between intentional and incidental down-regulation of negative emotions. Emotion, 12(2), 229-235, doi: 10.1037/a0027421.
Renfroe, J. B., Bradley, M. M., Sege, C. T., & Bowers, D. (2016). Emotional modulation of the late positive potential during picture free viewing in older and young adults. PLoS One, 11(9), e0162323, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162323.
Small, D. M., Zatorre, R. J., Dagher, A., Evans, A. C., & Jones-Gotman, M. (2001). Changes in brain activity related to eating chocolate: From pleasure to aversion. Brain, 124(9), 1720-1733, doi: 10.1093/brain/124.9.1720.
Torrisi, S. J., Lieberman, M. D., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Altshuler, L. L. (2013). Advancing understanding of affect labeling with dynamic causal modeling. NeuroImage, 82, 481-488, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.025.
Wang, A. T., Dapretto, M., Hariri, A. R., Sigman, M., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2004). Neural correlates of facial affect processing in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(4), 481-490, doi: 10.1097/00004583-200404000-00015.
Wiersema, J. R., van der Meere, J. J., & Roeyers, H. (2009). ERP correlates of error monitoring in adult ADHD. Journal of Neural Transmission, 116(3), 371-379, doi: 10.1007/s00702-008-0165-x.

[1]	李昀松, 陈启杨, 吴岩, 李天虹, 段如君. 形旁在形声字识别中的优势作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 439-446.
[2]	马利军, 梁俊煜, 马云霄. 谐音线索和“歇后”时间对谐音型歇后语理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 325-331.
[3]	李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[4]	李恒平, 何胜昔, 刘正奎. 快速阅读训练对基于视觉定向搜索的注意力影响：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 78-84.
[5]	王春梅, 吕勇. 高、低回避性消极情绪影响抑制功能的神经机制：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 577-582.
[6]	梅冬梅, 许远理. 元情绪对情绪感受的抑制作用：来自ERP的证据*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 449-455.
[7]	邱桂凤，张庆林. 反应与刺激冲突的脑机制差异:来自ERP研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 583-587.
[8]	谭钢, 侯玉玲, 曹智鹏. 遥远距离联想任务脑机制的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 746-751.
[9]	张光楠；周仁来,,4. 情绪对注意范围的影响: 动机程度的调节作用[J]. , 2013, 11(1): 30-36.
[10]	杜英春, 吕勇. 面孔加工特异性的事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(4): 268-274.