来源记忆中背景的情绪效价与唤醒对提取过程的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以往研究表明情绪背景对来源记忆存在影响，但背景的情绪效价和唤醒如何影响熟悉性及回想尚存争议。本研究以ERPs技术作为测量手段，采用来源记忆多键范式，操纵背景的情绪效价及唤醒强度，以探讨编码阶段背景情绪影响来源记忆提取的认知神经机制。学习阶段，呈现中性汉字及情绪图片（正性高唤醒、正性低唤醒、负性高唤醒、负性低唤醒）；测验阶段，仅呈现汉字，被试进行五键判断。行为结果发现：来源正确的比率比来源错误的比率更高，反应时更短；同时提取正性背景的辨别力更强，反应时更短；提取高唤醒背景反应时更短。脑电结果发现了分别代表熟悉性及回想的FN400及LPC新旧效应，且在500～700 ms，提取正性背景及高唤醒背景诱发显著更正的ERPs，但效价与唤醒没有交互作用。总体来说，来源记忆中背景效价及唤醒度对回想过程存在独立影响，体现为正性背景及高唤醒背景对来源提取的促进作用。

关键词: 来源记忆, 新旧效应, 情绪背景, 效价, 唤醒

Abstract: Recent studies have shown that source memory can be modulated by emotional context. Here, we used ERPs techniques to explore the cognitive and neurological mechanisms of source retrieval under different valence and arousal contexts. During the learning phase, participants encoded a series of Chinese words superimposed on pictures of four different kinds of emotion. During the test phase, only the Chinese words were presented. Participants were instructed to press one of five buttons to indicate whether the word had been presented at the learning phase with a highly positive background, a mildly positive background, a highly negative background, a mildly negative background, or was a new word. Behaviorally, successful source retrieval showed a significantly higher ratio and shorter reaction time than the unsuccessful source retrieval. Higher memory performance was observed for positive contexts than negative contexts, and for highly arousal contexts compared to mildly arousal contexts. The ERP results showed that, there were significant FN400 and LPC old/new effects, which represented familiarity and recollection respectively. Meanwhile, we found greater LPC old/new effects for the retrieval of positive and highly arousal contexts compared to the negative and mildly arousal contexts. However, there was no significant interaction between valence and arousal. Together, these results suggest both the positive context and the high arousal context can facilitate the recollection of the source information. Valence and arousal may influence source memory via different cognitive mechanisms.

Key words: source memory, old/new effect, emotional context, valence, arousal

中图分类号:

B842

胡哲, 张杰, 黎翠红, 郭春彦. 来源记忆中背景的情绪效价与唤醒对提取过程的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 185-192.

HU Zhe, ZHANG Jie, LI Cuihong, GUO Chunyan. The Effect of Valence and Arousal of Emotional Contexts on Source Memory[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(2): 185-192.

参考文献

胡哲, 张钦, 梁九清, 郭春彦. (2013). 不同情绪背景下来源记忆的ERPs研究. 心理学报, 45(7), 725-739
刘潇楠, 许翱翔, 周仁来. (2009). 国际情绪图片系统的本土化研究: 在中国大学生群体中的评定. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(6), 687-689
张丹丹, 陈钰, 敖翔, 孙国玉, 刘黎黎, 侯新琳, 陈玉明. (2019). 新生儿情绪性语音加工的正性偏向——来自事件相关电位的证据. 心理学报, 51(4), 462-470
Dolcos, F., Katsumi, Y., Weymar, M., Moore, M., Tsukiura, T., & Dolcos, S. (2017). Emerging directions in emotional episodic memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1867, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01867.
Duarte, A., Henson, R. N., & Graham, K. S. (2011). Stimulus content and the neural correlates of source memory. Brain Research, 1373, 110-123, doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.086.
Guo, C. Y., Duan, L., Li, W., & Paller, K. A. (2006). Distinguishing source memory and item memory: Brain potentials at encoding and retrieval. Brain Research, 1118(1), 142-154, doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.034.
Jaeger, A., Johnson, J. D., Corona, M., & Rugg, M. D. (2009). ERP correlates of the incidental retrieval of emotional information: Effects of study-test delay. Brain Research, 1269, 105-113, doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.082.
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition, 31(8), 1169-1180.
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2004). Two routes to emotional memory: Distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(9), 3310-3315, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306408101.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). NIMH center for the study of emotion and attention, international affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: Uiversity of Florida.
Maratos, E. J., & Rugg, M. D. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates of the retrieval of emotional and non-emotional context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(7), 877-891, doi: 10.1162/089892901753165809.
Martínez-Galindo, J. G., & Cansino, S. (2015). Positive and negative emotional contexts unevenly predict episodic memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 291, 89-102, doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.018.
Martínez-Galindo, J. G., & Cansino, S. (2017). Emotional context during encoding modulates recognition electrophysiological activity. Experimental Brain Research, 235(1), 169-179, doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4780-8.
McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 62(3), 203-208, doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90015-2.
Meng, X. X., Zhang, L., Liu, W. W., Ding, X. S., Li, H., Yang, J. M., & Yuan, J. J. (2017). The impact of emotion intensity on recognition memory: Valence polarity matters. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 116, 16-25, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.01.014.
Mickley, K. R., & Kensinger, E. A. (2008). Emotional valence influences the neural correlates associated with remembering and knowing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(2), 143-152.
Mitchell, K. J., & Johnson, M. K. (2009). Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory? Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 638-677, doi: 10.1037/a0015849.
Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(6), 251-257, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004.
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145-172, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145.
Sakaki, M., Niki, K., & Mather, M. (2012). Beyond arousal and valence: The importance of the biological versus social relevance of emotional stimuli. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(1), 115-139.
Smith, A. P. R., Henson, R. N. A., Rugg, M. D., & Dolan, R. J. (2005). Modulation of retrieval processing reflects accuracy of emotional source memory. Learning & Memory, 12(5), 472-479.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(1), 34-50, doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34.
Ventura-Bort, C., Dolcos, F., Wendt, J., Wirkner, J., Hamm, A. O., & Weymar, M. (2017). Item and source memory for emotional associates is mediated by different retrieval processes. Neuropsychologia, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.015.
Ventura-Bort, C., Löw, A., Wendt, J., Moltó, J., Poy, R., Dolcos, F.,.. Weymar, M. (2016). Binding neutral information to emotional contexts: Brain dynamics of long-term recognition memory. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(2), 234-247.
Zhang, Q., Liu, X., An, W., Yang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Recognition memory of neutral words can be impaired by task-irrelevant emotional encoding contexts: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 73.

[1]	周爱保, 赵海燕, 夏瑞雪, 袁月, 贾婷婷, 谢珮. 不同语义水平下参照方式、情绪效价和特质评价对记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 145-152.
[2]	赵思怡, 李莹, 王悦. 情绪效价−空间动作隐喻联结对成人和儿童外语情绪词学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 153-159.
[3]	杜夏雨, 史从戎, 赵子仪, 薛婷. 情绪效价和动机情绪对创造力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 160-165.
[4]	吴慧芬, 黎晓娜, 张琼, 唐一纯, 刘华山. 因为注意，所以拥有—纯粹所有权效应内部机制探究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 161-167,175.
[5]	岳鹏飞, 史梦梦, 刘旭, 白学军. 词汇的唤醒度对情绪标注效应的影响—ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 31-38.
[6]	刘艳, 朱智, 马谐. 双语经验对执行功能的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 452-460.
[7]	金雪莲, 姜英杰, 王志伟. 3~6岁儿童情景记忆及其监测能力的发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 650-656.
[8]	邢强, 孙海龙, 车敬上. 反馈效价影响家族相似性类别学习的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 300-307.
[9]	黄时华, 曾艳芬, 张卫. 情绪效价对不同抑郁水平大学生的反应性控制和主动性控制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 807-814.
[10]	王汉林, 莫雷. “动作-评价”效应：动作与认知的交互作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 626-632.
[11]	谢丽丽,徐慧芳,姜媛,方平. 情绪的确定性评价对信息加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 305-310.
[12]	白学军,刘颖,章鹏,张琪涵. 非情绪与情绪背景下行为抑制时外侧前额叶的功能分化：一项fNIRS研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(5): 606-613.
[13]	王芹, 白学军, 李士一. 情绪背景和社会预期对社会经济决策行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 191-197.
[14]	贾孟华, 杨小洋, 王大华. 婚姻自传体记忆的数量特征：时间与依恋风格的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 271-277.
[15]	隋雪,纪雅婷,陈欣,任桂琴. 正负效价面部表情图片加工的差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 7-12.