学业自我效能感与在线学习投入的关系：学习动机和心流体验的链式中介作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨学业自我效能感对在线学习投入的影响及其作用机制，采用学业自我效能感量表、学习动机量表、心流体验量表和在线学习投入量表，对310名在线学习者进行问卷调查。结果发现：（1）学业自我效能感对在线学习投入具有正向预测作用；（2）学习动机和心流体验分别在学业自我效能感和在线学习投入之间起部分中介作用；（3）学习动机、心流体验在学业自我效能感和在线学习投入之间起链式中介作用。

关键词: 学业自我效能感, 学习动机, 心流体验, 学习投入, 在线学习

Abstract: This study aimed to explore the effect of academic self-efficacy on online learning engagement and its underlying mechanism. A total of 310 colleges students were surveyed with the Academic Self-efficacy Scale, Learning Motivation Scale, Flow Experience Scale and Online Learning Engagement Scale. The results were as follows: 1) Academic self-efficacy could significantly predict student online learning engagement. 2) Learning motivation and flow experience respectively played significant mediating roles between academic self-efficacy and online learning engagement. 3) Learning motivation and flow experience played significant chain mediating roles between academic self-efficacy and online learning engagement.

Key words: academic self-efficacy, learning motivation, flow experience, learning engagement, online learning

中图分类号:

B844

蔡林, 贾绪计. 学业自我效能感与在线学习投入的关系：学习动机和心流体验的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 805-811.

CAI Lin, JIA Xuji. The Effect of Academic Self-Efficacy on Online Learning Engagement: The Chain Mediating Role of Learning Motivation and Flow Experience[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(6): 805-811.

参考文献

陈圆圆, 张卫, 朱键军, 喻承甫, 张一波, 卢镇辉. (2016). 同伴侵害对青少年问题性网络游戏使用的影响: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 32(6), 733-744
段朝辉, 洪建中. (2019). 网络视频课程中师生交互与大学生网络学习绩效的关系: 学习自我效能感与学习动机的序列中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 35(2), 184-191
方杰, 温忠麟, 张敏强, 孙配贞. (2014). 基于结构方程模型的多重中介效应分析. 心理科学, 37(3), 735-741
黄庆双, 李玉斌, 任永功, 郑玉敏, 黄悦悦. (2019). 大学生成就目标定向对在线学习投入影响研究: 学业拖延的中介作用. 现代远距离教育, 36(5), 77-85, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8700.2019.05.010
刘斌, 张文兰, 刘君玲. (2017). 教师支持对在线学习者学习投入的影响研究. 电化教育研究, 38(11), 63-68, 80
龙成志, 刘志梅. (2016). 学习动机对自主学习行为的影响: 以学习能力为中介. 应用心理学, 22(3), 203-210, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2016.03.002
王卫, 史锐涵, 李晓娜. (2017). 基于心流体验的在线学习持续意愿影响因素研究. 中国远程教育(综合版), (5), 17-23
张妮, 张屹, 张魁元. (2008). 对外汉语教育游戏的总体设计之实证研究. 开放教育研究, 14(5), 80-86, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2179.2008.05.015
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950
Alhadabi, A., Aldhafri, S., Alkharusi, H., Al-Harthy, I., Alrajhi, M., & Albarashdi, H. (2019). Modelling parenting styles, moral intelligence, academic self-efficacy and learning motivation among adolescents in grades 7-11. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 133-153, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2019.1575795.
Alivernini, F., & Lucidi, F. (2011). Relationship between social context, self-efficacy, motivation, academic achievement, and intention to drop out of high school: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(4), 241-252, doi: 10.1080/00220671003728062.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 175-191, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.04.004.
Cetin-Dindar, A. (2016). Student motivation in constructivist learning environment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(2), 233-247.
Chang, Y. P., & Zhu, D. H. (2012). The role of perceived social capital and flow experience in building users’ continuance intention to social networking sites in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 995-1001, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.001.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109, doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059.
Ho, L. A., & Kuo, T. H. (2010). How can one amplify the effect of e-learning? An examination of high-tech employees’ computer attitude and flow experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 23-31, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.007.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tsai, C. R., Tai, K. H., & Wu, Y. F. (2020). The effect of social dilemma on flow experience: Prosociality relevant to collective efficacy and goal achievement motivation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(2), 239-258, doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-09958-3.
Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(3), 341-358.
Kennedy, E. (2010). Narrowing the achievement gap: Motivation, engagement, and self-efficacy matter. Journal of Education, 190(3), 1-11, doi: 10.1177/002205741019000302.
Kim, C. M., Park, S. W., Cozart, J., & Lee, H. (2015). From motivation to engagement: The role of effort regulation of virtual high school students in mathematics courses. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 261-272.
Maricutoiu, L. P., & Sulea, C. (2019). Evolution of self-efficacy, student engagement and student burnout during a semester. A multilevel structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differ-ences, 76, 101785.
Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 413-440, doi: 10.1348/000709906X118036.
Mesurado, B., Richaud, M. C., & Mateo, N. J. (2016). Engagement, flow, self-efficacy, and eustress of university students: A cross-national comparison between the Philippines and Argentina. The Journal of Psychology, 150(3), 281-299, doi: 10.1080/00223980.2015.1024595.
Özhan, Ş. Ç., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). The effects of flow, emotional engagement, and motivation on success in a gamified online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 2006-2031, doi: 10.1177/0735633118823159.
Park, S., & Yun, H. (2018). The influence of motivational regulation strategies on online students’ behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 43-56, doi: 10.1080/08923647.2018.1412738.
Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & McCormick, A. C. (2011). An investigation of the contingent relationships between learning community participation and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 52(3), 300-322, doi: 10.1007/s11162-010-9192-1.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158-176, doi: 10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860.
Sökmen, Y. (2019). The role of self-efficacy in the relationship between the learning environment and student engagement. Educational Studies, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2019.1665986.
Srivastava, K., Shukla, A., & Sharma, N. (2010). Online flow experiences: The role of need for cognition, self-efficacy, and sensation seeking tendency. International Journal of Business Insights and Transfor-mation, 3(2), 93-101.
Taylor, A. B., MacKinnon, D. P., & Tein, J. Y. (2008). Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 241-269, doi: 10.1177/1094428107300344.
Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication: Electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication Research, 19(5), 539-573, doi: 10.1177/009365092019005001.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
Wu, H. B., Li, S., Zheng, J., & Guo, J. R. (2020). Medical students’ motivation and academic performance: The mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Medical Education Online, 25(1), 1742964, doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1742964.

[1]	李嘉欣, 雒瑞帆, 封洪敏, 司继伟. 初中生感知到的同伴支持与数学学习投入—基于变量为中心和个体为中心的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 629-636.
[2]	鲍旭辉, 黄杰, 李娜, 李健军, 李亚红. 主动性人格对学习投入的影响：领悟社会支持和积极情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 508-514.
[3]	岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦. 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入：状态焦虑与性别的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 226-232.
[4]	姜琨, 兰泽波, 孙晓铜, 丁晓辉, 陶佳雨. 听障大学生社会支持对学业自我效能感的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 96-100.
[5]	黄熙彤, 张敏强, 方俊燕, 李拓宇, 房燕, 甘露. 家长投入对子女学业成绩的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 666-672.
[6]	刁春婷, 周文倩, 黄臻. 小学生成长型思维模式与学业成绩、生活满意度的关系：学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 524-529.
[7]	贾绪计, 李雅倩, 蔡林, 王庆瑾, 林琳. 自我妨碍与学习投入的关系：学业浮力的中介作用和父母支持的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 227-233.
[8]	蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 小学生能力观对数学学习投入的影响：学业控制感和期望的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 490-496.
[9]	王烨晖, 张缨斌, 辛涛. 父母教育期望对四年级学生数学成就的影响：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 96-102.
[10]	雷玉菊, 张冬静, 牛更枫, 胡祥恩,. 网络学习中学习者个人特征对学习投入的影响：一个有调节的中介效应模型*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 181-188.
[11]	杨春, 路海东. 不同形式的评估反馈对大学生的学习动机和学习成绩的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 237-241.
[12]	魏军，刘儒德，何伊丽，唐铭，邸妙词，庄鸿娟. 小学生学习坚持性和学习投入在效能感、内在价值与学业成就关系中的中介作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 326-332.
[13]	程黎；窦迪娅；冯超；綦春霞；Martin Valcke3. 11岁和15岁儿童学习动机和数学素养的关系[J]. , 2013, 11(1): 84-89.