父母自主支持与高中生学习投入：意向性自我调节和学校联结的作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨父母自主支持对高中生学习投入的影响及其内在作用机制，使用父母自主支持量表、意向性自我调节问卷、学校联结问卷和中文版学习投入量表对977名高中生进行施测。结果表明：(1)父母自主支持能够显著正向预测高中生的学习投入；(2)意向性自我调节在父母自主支持与学习投入关系中的中介作用显著；(3)父母自主支持影响学习投入的直接效应以及意向性自我调节中介作用的前半路径均受到学校联结的调节。研究结果凸显了家校协同在促进学生发展适应中的重要作用并揭示了其内在机制，对于推动家庭教育、提升学生学习投入和发展适应水平具有现实启示。

关键词: 父母自主支持, 学习投入, 意向性自我调节, 学校联结

Abstract:

To examine the association between parental autonomy support and learning engagement, as well as the underlying mechanism among senior high school students, 977 students were recruited to complete a set of scales measuring parental autonomy support, intentional self-regulation, school connectedness and learning engagement. The results showed that: 1) parental autonomy support could positively predict high school students’ learning engagement; 2) the mediating role of intentional self-regulation in parental autonomy support and learning engagement was significant; 3) both the direct relation between parental autonomy support and learning engagement, and the mediating effect of intentional self-regulation (the association between parental autonomy support and intentional self-regulation) were moderated by school connectedness. These findings not only highlight the important role of family and school coordination in promoting students’ adaptation and the underlying mechanism, but also have practical implications to promote family education and students’ adaptation.

Key words: parental autonomy support, learning engagement, intentional self-regulation, school connectedness

中图分类号:

B844

武俐, 郭元祥. 父母自主支持与高中生学习投入：意向性自我调节和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 64-70.

Li WU, Yuanxiang GUO. The Association Between Parental Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement of Senior High School Students: The Roles of Intentional Self-Regulation and School Connectedness[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(1): 64-70.

图/表 4

参考文献

	鲍振宙, 张卫, 李董平, 李丹黎, 王艳辉. 校园氛围与青少年学业成就的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29 (1): 61- 70.
	常淑敏, 郭明宇, 王靖民, 王玲晓, 张文新. 学校资源对青少年早期幸福感发展的影响: 意向性自我调节的纵向中介作用. 心理学报, 2020, 52 (7): 874- 885.
	常淑敏, 宋育珊, 魏亦峰. 外部发展资源与青少年早期幸福感的关系: 内部发展资源和意向性自我调节的多重中介作用. 中国特殊教育, 2017, (5): 49- 55. DOI
	邓林园, 杨梦茜, 杨雨萌, 周楠, 李蓓蕾. 父母自主支持、父母心理控制和青少年网络成瘾的关系: 一项交叉滞后研究. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20 (2): 190- 196, 254. DOI
	方来坛, 时勘, 张风华. 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2008, 16 (6): 618- 620.
	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系: 情绪安全感和学校联结的作用. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39 (5): 726- 734.
	贾绪计, 蔡林, 林琳, 林崇德. 高中生感知教师支持与学习投入的关系: 学业自我效能感和成就目标定向的链式中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36 (6): 700- 707.
	林间开, 陈雨漩, 陈沛, 喻承甫. 学校联结, 意向性自我调节与高中生未来取向的关系: 感恩的调节作用. 教育测量与评价, 2021, (12): 50- 58.
	刘小先, 龚少英, 周治金, 封晓伟, 于全磊. 父母自主支持、心理控制与初中生创意自我效能的关系: 学业情绪的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36 (1): 45- 53.
	彭顺, 牛更枫, 汪夏, 张红坡, 胡祥恩. 父母自主支持对青少年积极情绪适应的影响: 基本心理需要满足的中介与调节作用模型. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37 (2): 240- 248.
	谭丽苹, 李晴, 郭成. 师生关系对留守儿童学习投入的影响: 有调节的中介模型. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20 (6): 782- 789. DOI
	王国霞, 盖笑松. 青少年期的意向性自我调节. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19 (8): 1158- 1165.
	邢强, 郑程娜, 唐辉, 肖雨彤. 教师自主支持对初中生学校适应的影响: 有调节的中介模型. 教育测量与评价, 2021, (7): 47- 56.
	殷颢文, 白学军. 学校联结对订单定向医学生学业成就的影响: 多重中介效应. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30 (12): 1846- 1851.
	殷颢文, 贾林祥. 学校联结的研究现状与发展趋势. 心理科学, 2014, 37 (5): 1180- 1184.
	喻承甫, 张卫, 曾毅茵, 叶婷, 李月明, 王姝君. 青少年感恩与问题行为的关系: 学校联结的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27 (4): 425- 433.
	周爱保, 胡砚冰, 刘锦涛, 鲁小勇, 王有丽, 周滢鑫. 青少年社交焦虑与学习投入的关系: 意向性自我调节的解释作用及其年龄差异. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38 (1): 54- 63.
	Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R.. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, white women. Health Psychology, 2000, 19 (6): 586- 592. DOI
	Bailey, M., Cao, R., Kuchler, T., Stroebel, J., & Wong, A.. Social connectedness: Measurement, determinants, and effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2018, 32 (3): 259- 280. DOI
	Bond, L., Butler, H., Thomas, L., Carlin, J., Glover, S., Bowes, G., & Patton, G.. Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2007, 40 (4): 9- 18.
	Brauer, J. R.. Cultivating conformists or raising rebels? Connecting parental control and autonomy support to adolescent delinquency. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2017, 27 (2): 452- 470. DOI
	Burns, E. C., Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J.. A future time perspective of secondary school students’ academic engagement and disengagement: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 2021, 84, 109- 123. DOI
	Fite, P. J., Rubens, S. L., & Cooley, J. L.. Influence of contextual factors on academic performance in a sample of Latino adolescents: The moderating role of school attachment. Journal of Community Psychology, 2014, 42 (8): 924- 936. DOI
	Gestsdóttir, S., & Lerner, R. M.. Intentional self-regulation and positive youth development in early adolescence: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Developmental Psychology, 2007, 43 (2): 508- 521. DOI
	Gestsdóttir, S., & Lerner, R. M.. Positive development in adolescence: The development and role of intentional self-regulation. Human Development, 2008, 51 (3): 202- 224. DOI
	Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 148–161.
	Lerner, R. M., Theokas, C., & Jelicic, H. (2005). Youth as active agents in their own positive development: A developmental systems perspective. In W. Greve, K. Rothermund, & D. Wentura (Eds.), The adaptive self: Personal continuity and intentional self-development (pp. 31–47). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
	Liu, Y. L., & Chang, H. T.. The role of effortful control in the relationships among parental control, intentional self-regulation, and adolescent obedience. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2016, 25 (8): 2435- 2446. DOI
	Maddox, S. J., & Prinz, R. J.. School bonding in children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment, and associated variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2003, 6 (1): 31- 49. DOI
	McCurdy, A. L., Williams, K. N., Lee, G. Y., Benito-Gomez, M., & Fletcher, A. C.. Measurement of parental autonomy support: A review of theoretical concerns and developmental considerations. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2020, 12 (3): 382- 397.
	Napolitano, C. M., Bowers, E. P., Gestsdóttir, S., & Chase, P. A.. The development of intentional self-regulation in adolescence: Describing, explaining, and optimizing its link to positive youth development. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 2011, 41, 19- 38.
	Pinquart, M.. Associations of parenting styles and dimensions with academic achievement in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 2016, 28 (3): 475- 493. DOI
	Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
	Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., Chaput, J. P., & Hamilton, H. A.. Social media use, school connectedness, and academic performance among adolescents. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 2019, 40 (2): 189- 211. DOI
	Shute, R., Maud, M., & McLachlan, A.. The relationship of recalled adverse parenting styles with maladaptive schemas, trait anger, and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2019, 259, 337- 348. DOI
	Stefansson, K. K., Gestsdottir, S., Birgisdottir, F., & Lerner, R. M.. School engagement and intentional self-regulation: A reciprocal relation in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 2018, 64 (1): 23- 33. DOI
	Vasquez, A. C., Patall, E. A., Fong, C. J., Corrigan, A. S., & Pine, L.. Parent autonomy support, academic achievement, and psychosocial functioning: A meta-analysis of research. Educational Psychology Review, 2016, 28 (3): 605- 644. DOI
	Vrolijk, P., Van Lissa, C. J., Branje, S. J. T., Meeus, W. H. J., & Keizer, R.. Longitudinal linkages between father and mother autonomy support and adolescent problem behaviors: Between-family differences and within-family effects. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2020, 49 (11): 2372- 2387. DOI
	Wang, Q., Pomerantz, E. M., & Chen, H. C.. The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, 2007, 78 (5): 1592- 1610. DOI
	Wilson, D.. The interface of school climate and school connectedness and relationships with aggression and victimization. Journal of School Health, 2004, 74 (7): 293- 299. DOI

变量	M	SD	1	2	3
1.父母自主支持	3.51	0.79
2.意向性自我调节	3.58	0.64	0.32***
3.学校联结	3.28	0.53	0.28***	0.30***
4.学习投入	4.38	1.25	0.31***	0.54***	0.41***

变量	M	SD	1	2	3
1.父母自主支持	3.51	0.79
2.意向性自我调节	3.58	0.64	0.32***
3.学校联结	3.28	0.53	0.28***	0.30***
4.学习投入	4.38	1.25	0.31***	0.54***	0.41***

预测变量	结果变量：意向性自我调节			结果变量：学习投入
预测变量	β	t	Boot 95% CI	β	t	Boot 95% CI
性别	0.07	2.34*	[0.02, 0.13]	0.01	0.05	[−0.03, 0.05]
年龄	−0.06	−2.01*	[−0.11, −0.01]	0.04	1.53	[−0.02, 0.10]
社会经济地位	0.04	1.93	[−0.02, 0.10]	−0.02	−0.65	[−0.06, 0.03]
自主支持	0.25	8.28***	[0.13, 0.37]	0.10	3.79**	[0.04, 0.17]
意向性自我调节				0.36	15.29***	[0.22, 0.50]
学校联结	0.21	6.36***	[0.11, 0.22]	0.22	7.79***	[0.11, 0.23]
自主支持×学校联结	0.12	4.73***	[0.05, 0.20]	0.09	3.03**	[0.04, 0.14]
R²		0.19			0.38
F		37.61***			82.99***

预测变量	结果变量：意向性自我调节			结果变量：学习投入
预测变量	β	t	Boot 95% CI	β	t	Boot 95% CI
性别	0.07	2.34*	[0.02, 0.13]	0.01	0.05	[−0.03, 0.05]
年龄	−0.06	−2.01*	[−0.11, −0.01]	0.04	1.53	[−0.02, 0.10]
社会经济地位	0.04	1.93	[−0.02, 0.10]	−0.02	−0.65	[−0.06, 0.03]
自主支持	0.25	8.28***	[0.13, 0.37]	0.10	3.79**	[0.04, 0.17]
意向性自我调节				0.36	15.29***	[0.22, 0.50]
学校联结	0.21	6.36***	[0.11, 0.22]	0.22	7.79***	[0.11, 0.23]
自主支持×学校联结	0.12	4.73***	[0.05, 0.20]	0.09	3.03**	[0.04, 0.14]
R²		0.19			0.38
F		37.61***			82.99***

[1]	赵新宇, 乔晓光, 邢晓沛. 父母自主支持、10～12岁儿童的同伴关系与执行功能的动态互动关系：一个发展级联模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 55-63.
[2]	易芳, 熊小娇, 滕召军, 叶宝娟, 廖丽萍, 颜茹娜, 李玉华. 积极同伴压力与初中生病理性互联网使用的关系：希望和意向性自我调节的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(5): 637-643.
[3]	高斌, 谭莉华, 张丹丹, 黎明新, 蔡艳香. 网络社会支持与高中生网络学习投入：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 403-409.
[4]	谭丽苹, 李晴, 郭成. 师生关系对留守儿童学习投入的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(6): 782-789.
[5]	李嘉欣, 雒瑞帆, 封洪敏, 司继伟. 初中生感知到的同伴支持与数学学习投入—基于变量为中心和个体为中心的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 629-636.
[6]	鲍旭辉, 黄杰, 李娜, 李健军, 李亚红. 主动性人格对学习投入的影响：领悟社会支持和积极情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 508-514.
[7]	邓林园, 杨梦茜, 杨雨萌, 周楠, 李蓓蕾. 父母自主支持、父母心理控制和青少年网络成瘾的关系：一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 190-196.
[8]	岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦. 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入：状态焦虑与性别的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 226-232.
[9]	蔡林, 贾绪计. 学业自我效能感与在线学习投入的关系：学习动机和心流体验的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 805-811.
[10]	黄熙彤, 张敏强, 方俊燕, 李拓宇, 房燕, 甘露. 家长投入对子女学业成绩的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 666-672.
[11]	邓林园, 高诗晴, 赵红丽, 王小婷, 方晓义. 自主支持、基本心理需要满足对一年级职高生内外化问题的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 482-488.
[12]	贾绪计, 李雅倩, 蔡林, 王庆瑾, 林琳. 自我妨碍与学习投入的关系：学业浮力的中介作用和父母支持的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 227-233.
[13]	蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 小学生能力观对数学学习投入的影响：学业控制感和期望的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 490-496.
[14]	雷玉菊, 张冬静, 牛更枫, 胡祥恩,. 网络学习中学习者个人特征对学习投入的影响：一个有调节的中介效应模型*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 181-188.
[15]	魏军，刘儒德，何伊丽，唐铭，邸妙词，庄鸿娟. 小学生学习坚持性和学习投入在效能感、内在价值与学业成就关系中的中介作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 326-332.