金钱与时间感受启动对择偶标准的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究不同的金钱和时间感受下个体如何选择配偶，分别招募了370和382名被试，启动个体的金钱富足/剥夺感受和时间富足/剥夺感受，并完成择偶标准量表。结果发现：（1）相比于金钱/时间剥夺感受启动下的个体，金钱/时间富足感受启动下的个体会提出更高的择偶标准；金钱富足感受启动下个体会在外貌和社会经济地位等特质上提高标准，而时间富足感受启动下个体会在性格和社会经济地位等特质上提高标准。（2）金钱启动下，启动组别和性别的交互作用不显著，相比于金钱剥夺感受启动组，男性不会在金钱富足感受启动下提出更高的择偶标准。（3）时间启动下，启动组别和性别的交互作用显著，相比于时间富足感受启动组，女性在时间剥夺感受启动下会降低择偶标准，而男性不会。

关键词: 金钱感受, 时间感受, 启动技术, 择偶标准, 性别差异

Abstract: In order to explore how individuals choose their spouses under different feelings of money and time, 370 and 382 subjects were recruited to prime their feelings of money abundance (deprivation) and time abundance (deprivation) respectively, and then they were asked to complete the Mate Selection Criterial Scale (MSCS). The results were as follows: 1) Individuals primed with money (time) abundance feeling put forward a higher standard of mate selection than individuals primed with money (time) deprivation; individuals feeling rich in money raised the standard on the characteristics related to appearance and socio-economic status, while those feeling rich in time raised the standard on the characteristics related to personality and socio-economic status. 2)The interaction between money priming and sex was not significant. Compared with the money deprivation priming group, male did not put forward higher mate selection criteria under money abundance priming. 3) The interaction between time priming and sex was significant. Compared with the time abundance priming group, female would lower their mate selection criteria after time deprivation priming, while male would not.

Key words: feeling of money, feeling of time, priming technique, mate selection criteria, sex difference

中图分类号:

B849

侯娟, 郑心怡, 王秀, 方晓义. 金钱与时间感受启动对择偶标准的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.

HOU Juan, ZHENG Xinyi, WANG Xiu, FANG Xiaoyi. The Effect of Money Priming and Time Priming on Mate Selection[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.

参考文献

陈永香, 要梦霞. (2018). 资源多寡对大学生择偶线索偏好的影响. 心理科学, 41(3), 674–679
邓林园, 戴丽琼, 方晓义. (2014). 夫妻价值观相似性、沟通模式与婚姻质量的关系. 心理与行为研究, 12(2), 231–237, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2014.02.015
侯娟, 黄佳妮, 方晓义. (2017). 个体理想伴侣偏好的内隐-外显性差异研究. 心理与行为研究, 15(4), 551–561, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2017.04.017
李龙珠, 徐琛, 王磊. (2016). 男性择偶决策的线索偏好及信息加工方式. 青年研究, (1), 39–48
刘永芳, 苏丽娜, 王怀勇. (2011). 女性择偶决策的线索偏好及信息加工方式. 心理学报, 43(1), 21–29
钱炜楠. (2017). 不同金钱启动下心理账户对消费决策的影响(硕士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
苏丽娜. (2007). 女性择偶过程中的决策机制探讨——寻找配偶过程中的“满意性”(硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
田芊. (2012). 中国女性择偶倾向研究——基于进化心理学的解释(博士学位论文). 复旦大学, 上海.
王燕, 侯博文, 李歆瑶, 李晓煦, 焦璐. (2017). 不同性别比和资源获取能力对未婚男性择偶标准的影响. 心理学报, 49(9), 1195–1205
王雨晴, 姚鹏飞, 周国梅. (2015). 面孔吸引力、人格标签对于男女择偶偏好的影响. 心理学报, 47(1), 108–118
巫金根, 黄永华. (2015). 年龄对青年择偶行为的影响——来自网络择偶启事的数据. 心理研究, 8(5), 73–77, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1159.2015.05.011
谢天, 周静, 俞国良. (2012). 金钱启动研究的理论与方法. 心理科学进展, 20(6), 918–925
谢延浩. (2011). 个体差异、参照体选择与意义建构对薪酬满意的作用机理研究(博士学位论文). 南京理工大学.
乐国安, 陈浩, 张彦彦. (2005). 进化心理学择偶心理机制假设的跨文化检验——以天津、Boston两地征婚启事的内容分析为例. 心理学报, 37(4), 561–568
张璟, 郑沁婷, 唐日新, 李婷敏, 周双珠. (2020). 不同性别比背景的启动对女大学生择偶偏好的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(4), 665–669, doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2020.04.003
张林, 刘燊, 李玥, 阮鲁君. (2016). 异性拒绝对大学生择偶行为的长期影响: 基于社会计量器理论的探讨. 心理科学, 39(1), 131–136, doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20160120
赵强. (2015). 时间与金钱沉没成本效应的相关研究(硕士学位论文). 暨南大学, 广州.
邹红, 杨骏, 陈世琦, 廖文晨, 陈蓉蓉. (2014). 大学生恋爱决策中内隐与外显线索偏好的研究. 心理科学, 37(4), 902–906, doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2014.04.025
Bleske-Rechek, A., VandenHeuvel, B., & vander Wyst, M. (2009). Age variation in mating strategies and mate preferences: Beliefs versus reality. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(2), 179–205, doi: 10.1177/147470490900700204.
Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 559–570, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232, doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204.
DeVoe, S. E., & Pfeffer, J. (2007). When time is money: The effect of hourly payment on the evaluation of time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 1–13, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.003.
Grammer, K. (1992). Variations on a theme: Age dependent mate selection in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 100–102, doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00067704.
Hansen, J., Kutzner, F., & Wänke, M. (2013). Money and thinking: Reminders of money trigger abstract construal and shape consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1154–1166, doi: 10.1086/667691.
Hou, J., Shu, T. X., & Fang, X. Y. (2020). Influence of resources on cue preferences in mate selection. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2368, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574168.
Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 951–969, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.951.
Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 97–116, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x.
Li, Y. M., Li, J., Chan, D. K. S., & Zhang, B. (2016). When love meets money: Priming the possession of money influences mating strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 387, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00387.
Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543–557, doi: 10.1086/588699.
Sharma, E., & Alter, A. L. (2012). Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 545–560, doi: 10.1086/664038.
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802), 1154–1156, doi: 10.1126/science.1132491.
Yong, J. C., & Li, N. P. (2012). Cash in hand, want better looking mate: Significant resource cues raise men’s mating standards. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 55–58, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.018.
Zhou, X. Y., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). The symbolic power of money: Reminders of money alter social distress and physical pain. Psychological Science, 20(6), 700–706, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02353.x.

[1]	岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦. 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入：状态焦虑与性别的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 226-232.
[2]	郭庆童, 徐铭雪, 许春艳, 刘秀丽. 大学生宿舍人际关系困扰与手机成瘾的关系：序列中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 650-656.
[3]	赵悦彤, 孙晓娟, 白倩, 张向葵. 空间活动问卷的修订及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 289-296.
[4]	魏淑华, 赵健, 董及美, 陈功香. 工作对家庭的增益与中小学教师的工作满意度：职业认同的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 125-130,136.
[5]	张振, 齐春辉, 付淑英, 王青春, 熊建萍. 社会距离和性别对公平关注的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 100-106.
[6]	李甜甜, 吕勇. 面部表情觉知阈限的测量及其年龄和性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 771-777.
[7]	兰晓芳,张锦坤. 负面评价恐惧的性别差异：基于内隐和外显测量的比较[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 25-30.
[8]	李悠, 江信文, 王飞雪. 性别及控制感对中国大学生信任行为的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(6): 847-850.
[9]	姚昭；王振宏；雷榕3. 词—面孔任务中的情绪效价冲突效应及性别差异[J]. , 2011, 9(3): 181-184.
[10]	吕勇, 于乐, 刘亚平. 面孔再认能力性别差异的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(1): 18-22.
[11]	郑金香,阴国恩. 幼儿自由游戏行为性别差异的观察研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(2): 415-418.