初中生家庭社会经济地位、积极品质对中考成绩的预测作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以442名初中生为被试，采用历时20个月的纵向研究考察家庭社会经济地位（socioeconomic status, SES）和积极品质对中考成绩的预测作用。结果发现：（1）家庭SES、积极品质整体发展水平可以同时显著正向预测初中生在20个月后的中考成绩；（2）积极品质整体发展水平在家庭SES与中考成绩之间存在中介作用，即家庭SES越高，初中生的积极品质整体水平越高，其中考成绩越好。研究结果提示积极品质可以补偿低家庭SES对学生中考成绩的不良影响。

关键词: 积极品质, 学业成绩, 家庭社会经济地位, 初中生

Abstract: This 20-month longitudinal follow-up study examined the relationship between family socioeconomic status and the achievement of the high school entrance examination, and the compensating and mediating role of the overall level of positive quality. Four hundred and forty-two junior middle school students were investigated. The results showed that: 1) family SES and the overall level of positive quality positively predicted the achievement of the high school entrance examination; 2) family SES predicted the achievement of the high school entrance examination through the overall level of positive quality. Positive qualities could compensate for the negative effect of low family SES on academic achievement, and character education had the function of “education poverty alleviation”.

Key words: positive qualities, academic achievement, family socioeconomic status, junior middle school students

中图分类号:

B844

盖笑松, 吴晓靓, 顾婷玉, 张婵, 马媛春. 初中生家庭社会经济地位、积极品质对中考成绩的预测作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 368-374.

GAI Xiaosong, WU Xiaojing, GU Tingyu, ZHANG Chan, MA Yuanchun. The Predictive Role of Socioeconomic Status and Positive Qualities on Middle School Students’ Achievement of the High School Entrance Examination[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 368-374.

参考文献

常淑敏, 荆建蕾, 郭玲静, 孙晓颖. (2017). 发展资源与主观幸福感: 核心自我评价的中介作用及性别差异. 心理学探新, 37(6), 555–560
常淑敏, 宋育珊, 魏亦峰. (2017). 外部发展资源与青少年早期幸福感的关系: 内部发展资源和意向性自我调节的多重中介作用.中国特殊教育, (5), 49–55.
常淑敏, 张文新. (2013). 人类积极发展的资源模型——积极青少年发展研究的一个重要取向和领域. 心理科学进展, 21(1), 86–95
陈浩彬, 刘洁. (2018). 家庭社会经济地位与青少年智慧的关系: 积极教养方式和开放性人格的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(5), 558–566
段文杰, 张永红, 李婷婷, 唐小晴, 段天宇. (2012). 父母养育方式、性格优势对心理和谐的影响. 心理学探新, 32(2), 183–187
盖笑松. (2020). 积极心理学. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
盖笑松, 兰公瑞. (2013). 大学生积极发展问卷的编制. 心理与行为研究, 11(6), 786–791
盖笑松, 闫津廷, 谢燕萍, 邓梦蕙, 徐楠楠, 刘晓东. (2013). 高质量课外活动的特征分析. 现代教育科学, (2), 145–147, 136
高永金, 张瑜, 傅纳. (2017). 初中生积极心理品质发展现状调查. 中国特殊教育, (9), 89–96
郭庆科, 李芳, 陈雪霞, 王炜丽, 孟庆茂. (2008). 不同条件下拟合指数的表现及临界值的选择. 心理学报, 40(1), 109–118
彭飞. (2013). 社团活动经验与大学生积极发展的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
师保国, 申继亮. (2007). 家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 30–34
卫萍. (2016). 小学生积极心理品质与学业成绩的关系研究. 中国特殊教育, (10), 65–70
吴明隆. (2010). 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
叶枝, 赵国祥, 务凯, 刘霞. (2017). 积极青少年发展类型特点及其与学校适应的关系——基于潜在剖面分析的实证研究. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 23–31
张婵. (2013). 青少年积极品质的成分、测量及其作用 (博士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
张小菊, 赵敬. (2013). 大学新生父母教养方式与积极心理品质关系研究. 中国特殊教育, (1), 92–96
Adams, B. G., Wiium, N., & Abubakar, A. (2019). Developmental assets and academic performance of adolescents in Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa. Child & Youth Care Forum, 48(2), 207–222, doi: 10.1007/s10566-018-9480-z.
Benson, P. L. (2007). Developmental assets: An overview of theory, research, and practice. In R. K. Silbereisen & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Approaches to Positive Youth Development (pp. 33–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.
Choi, J. H., Yu, M., & Kim, K. E. (2015). The effect of Korean adolescents’ developmental assets and gratitude on their happiness: A mediating pathway of gratitude. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(S1), 320–326, doi: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS1/59307.
Conway, R. J., Heary, C., & Hogan, M. J. (2015). An evaluation of the measurement properties of the five Cs model of Positive Youth Development. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1941, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01941.
Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among America’s youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., .. Von Eye, A. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71, doi: 10.1177/0272431604272461.
Lerner, R. M., Wang, J., Chase, P. A., Gutierrez, A. S., Harris, E. M., Rubin, R. O., & Yalin, C. (2014). Using relational developmental systems theory to link program goals, activities, and outcomes: The sample case of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. New Directions for Youth Development, 2014(144), 17–30, doi: 10.1002/yd.20110.
Lin, N., & Bian, Y. J. (1991). Getting ahead in urban China. American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), 657–688.
Liu, J., Peng, P., & Luo, L. (2020). The relation between family socioeconomic status and academic achievement in China: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 49–76, doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09494-0.
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387–393.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D. A. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4(1), 27–46, doi: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0401_3.
Schmid, K. L., Phelps, E., Kiely, M. K., Napolitano, C. M., Boyd, M. J., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). The role of adolescents’ hopeful futures in predicting positive and negative developmental trajectories: Findings from the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 45–56, doi: 10.1080/17439760.2010.536777.
Shek, D. T. L., Siu, A. M. H., & Lee, T. Y. (2007). The Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: A validation study. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(3), 380–391, doi: 10.1177/1049731506296196.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453, doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417.
Sohr-Preston, S. L., Scaramella, L. V., Martin, M. J., Neppl, T. K., Ontai, L., & Conger, R. (2013). Parental socioeconomic status, communication, and children’s vocabulary development: A third-generation test of the family investment model. Child Development, 84(3), 1046–1062, doi: 10.1111/cdev.12023.
Thompson, R. B., Corsello, M., McReynolds, S., & Conklin-Powers, B. (2013). A longitudinal study of family socioeconomic status (SES) variables as predictors of socio-emotional resilience among mentored youth. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 21(4), 378–391, doi: 10.1080/13611267.2013.855864.
Weber, M., & Ruch, W. (2012). The role of a good character in 12-year-old school children: Do character strengths matter in the classroom? Child Indicators Research, 5(2), 317–334, doi: 10.1007/s12187-011-9128-0.

[1]	史滋福, 唐婉秋, 谢云天. 初中生认知需求与数学学业成绩的关系：基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 480-485.
[2]	万娇娇, 纪莉莉, 吴丽娜, 张亚飞, 刘改改, 谷璜, 赵俊峰. 农村留守初中生亲子亲合与安全感的关系：一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 500-506.
[3]	姚文玉, 张雯, 刘影, 张思敏, 丁雪辰, 徐刚敏. 儿童抑郁水平与学业成绩的发展轨迹：基于平行潜变量增长模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 223-229.
[4]	王晓诚, 贾丽娜, 金元英. 家庭社会经济地位对初中生阅读成就的影响：阅读动机和阅读活动的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 839-845.
[5]	黄熙彤, 张敏强, 方俊燕, 李拓宇, 房燕, 甘露. 家长投入对子女学业成绩的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 666-672.
[6]	谭千保, 李佳圆, 刘旭. 累积生态风险对农村初中生攻击行为的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 489-495.
[7]	刁春婷, 周文倩, 黄臻. 小学生成长型思维模式与学业成绩、生活满意度的关系：学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 524-529.
[8]	张野, 韩雪, 张珊珊, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生外化问题行为的影响：有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 354-360.
[9]	王立东, 李倩, 罗良. 父母家校沟通与小学生参与数学课外补习的关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 67-71.
[10]	周含芳, 刘志军, 樊毓美, 李百涵. 初中生亲子关系与网络欺负：孤独感的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 787-794.
[11]	张野, 韩雪, 李俊雅, 张珊珊. 学校人际关系对初中生乐观倾向的影响：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 662-667.
[12]	齐冰, 杨丽珠, 姚屹北. 不同情绪诱发下的情绪调节策略对初中生教育材料记忆的影响研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 202-208.
[13]	王璐, 宋娟, 魏艳秋, 解鸿宇, 彭瑶, 张静达. 初中生家庭环境与攻击性的关系：共情的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 216-222.
[14]	孔海燕, 孙雨, 宋广文. 心智游移、工作记忆对初中生阅读理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 362-370,377.
[15]	程刚, 张大均. 家庭社会经济地位对大学新生抑郁情绪的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 247-252.