几何图形社会角色隐喻的映射机制：行为和ERPs证据

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨几何图形和社会角色的隐喻联结及其映射关系，采用两个Stroop实验进行双向验证。结果发现，正方形和社会角色“父/男”，圆形和社会角色“母/女”存在隐喻一致性效应，并且强调了认知系统中关于几何图形和社会角色概念之间关系的映射双向性，为隐喻的复杂性提供了新的认识。ERPs结果表明，不一致条件比一致条件引起更大的N450和LPC成分，这为理解隐喻效应的神经机制提供了证据。

关键词: 几何图形, 社会角色, 隐喻, 映射机制

Abstract:

To investigate the metaphorical associations and mapping dynamics between geometric shapes and social roles, the study used two Stroop experiments for bidirectional validation. It was found that there was a metaphorical consistency effect between the square and the social role “father/male”, the circle and the social role “mother/female”, which emphasized the bidirectional mapping of the relationship between geometric shapes and social role in the cognitive system and provided new insights into the complexity of metaphors. The Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) results demonstrate that incongruent conditions elicit more pronounced N450 and Late Positive Component (LPC) responses compared to congruent conditions, which provided clues for understanding the neural mechanisms underlying metaphorical effects.

Key words: geometric shape, social role, metaphor, mapping mechanism

中图分类号:

B842

姚远青, 郭易安, 李春梅, 吴亚楠, 石雷, 赵广平. 几何图形社会角色隐喻的映射机制：行为和ERPs证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 23-30.

Yuanqing YAO, Yi’an GUO, Chunmei LI, Yanan WU, Lei SHI, Guangping ZHAO. The Mapping Mechanism of Social Role Metaphors in Geometric Shapes: Behavioral and ERPs Study[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(1): 23-30.

图/表 8

图1 实验1实验材料示例

表1 实验1中不同刺激材料下被试对社会角色文字方向判断的反应时(M±SD)(ms)

	父	母	男	女
正方形	519±64	543±65	524±64	531±66
圆形	529±63	523±61	536±69	520±61

图2 实验1中不同类型刺激材料下被试对社会角色文字方向判断的反应时注：误差线为SD，*p<0.05，**p<0.01，***p<0.001，以下同。

图3 实验1中9个电极的ERP平均波幅

图4 实验2实验材料示例

表2 实验2中不同刺激材料下被试对图形类型判断的反应时(M±SD)(ms)

	父	母	男	女
正方形	596±57	618±62	602±58	608±57
圆形	606±57	608±56	609±58	599±51

图5 实验2中不同类型刺激材料下被试对图形类型判断的反应时

图6 实验2中9个电极的ERP平均波幅

参考文献

	纪丽燕, 冀爱爱. 句子理解过程中敬语加工和词类加工的交互作用: 来自ERPs的证据. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21 (2): 169- 176.
	鲁忠义, 贾利宁, 翟冬雪. 道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射: 双向性及不平衡性. 心理学报, 2017, 49 (2): 186- 196.
	王丛兴, 马建平, 邓珏, 杨众望, 叶一舵. 概念加工深度影响道德概念水平方位隐喻联结. 心理学报, 2020, 52 (4): 426- 439.
	王美芳, 袁翠翠, 杨峰, 曹仁艳. 父母的性别角色教养态度及其与性别图式的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21 (4): 646- 649.
	杨继平, 郭秀梅, 王兴超. 道德概念的隐喻表征——从红白颜色、左右位置和正斜字体的维度. 心理学报, 2017, 49 (7): 875- 885.
	赵广平, 吴亚楠, 石雷, 陈顺森. 环性传递结构的启动优势及脑电证据. 心理科学, 2023, 46 (3): 685- 692.
	Aronoff, J., Barclay, A. M., & Stevenson, L. A.. The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54 (4): 647- 655. DOI
	Aronoff, J., Woike, B. A., & Hyman, L. M.. Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 62 (6): 1050- 1066. DOI
	Baker, H. D. (1979). Chinese family and kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
	Barsalou, L. W.. Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1999, 22 (4): 637- 660. DOI
	Beaucousin, V., Cassotti, M., Simon, G., Pineau, A., Kostova, M., Houdé, O., & Poirel, N.. ERP evidence of a meaningfulness impact on visual global/local processing: When meaning captures attention. Neuropsychologia, 2011, 49 (5): 1258- 1266. DOI
	Bem, S. L.. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 1981, 88 (4): 354- 364. DOI
	Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 2005, 112 (1): 193- 216. DOI
	Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D.. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 1998, 280 (5364): 747- 749. DOI
	Coderre, E., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. J. B.. Electrophysiological measures of conflict detection and resolution in the Stroop task. Brain Research, 2011, 1413, 51- 59. DOI
	Delorme, A., & Makeig, S.. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2004, 134 (1): 9- 21. DOI
	Di Russo, F., & Bianco, V.. Time course of reactive brain activities during a Stroop color-word task: Evidence of specific facilitation and interference effects. Brain Sciences, 2023, 13 (7): 982. DOI
	Elizabeth Crawford, L., Margolies, S. M., Drake, J. T., & Murphy, M. E.. Affect biases memory of location: Evidence for the spatial representation of affect. Cognition & Emotion, 2006, 20 (8): 1153- 1169.
	Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T.. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 2007, 114 (4): 864- 886. DOI
	Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G.. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 2009, 41 (4): 1149- 1160. DOI
	Franck, K., & Rosen, E.. A projective test of masculinity-femininity. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1949, 13 (4): 247- 256. DOI
	Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. New York: Psychology Press.
	Giessner, S. R., & Schubert, T. W.. High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007, 104 (1): 30- 44. DOI
	Heider, F., & Simmel, M.. An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 1944, 57 (2): 243- 259. DOI
	Heilbrun, A. B., Jr., Wydra, D., & Friedberg, L.. Parent identification and gender schema development. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1989, 150 (3): 293- 300. DOI
	Huang, Y. L., Tse, C. S., & Xie, J. S.. The bidirectional congruency effect of brightness-valence metaphoric association in the Stroop-like and priming paradigms. Acta Psychologica, 2018, 189, 76- 92. DOI
	Johnston, W. A., Hawley, K. J., & Elliott, J. M. (1991). Contribution of perceptual fluency to recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(2), 210–223.
	Kao, C. H., Chen, D. Y., & Chen, C. C.. The inversion effect in visual word form processing. Cortex, 2010, 46 (2): 217- 230. DOI
	Ke, Y. N., Zhang, Y., Jiang, J., & Xu, Y.. “It’s hip to be square”: Grounding moral traits in geometric shapes. International Journal of Psychology, 2020, 55 (3): 323- 331. DOI
	Kuethe, J. L. (1962). Social schemas and the reconstruction of social object displays from memory. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(1), 71–74.
	Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D.. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000, 4 (12): 463- 470. DOI
	Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 1980, 4 (2): 195- 208. DOI
	Larson, M. J., Kaufman, D. A. S., & Perlstein, W. M.. Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 2009, 47 (3): 663- 670. DOI
	Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N.. Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, 103 (5): 737- 749. DOI
	Li, Y. L., Du, J., Song, Q. F., Wu, S. N., & Liu, L. H.. An ERP study of the temporal course of gender-color Stroop effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 11, 613196. DOI
	Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C. B., & Galinsky, A. D.. The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 2010, 21 (3): 381- 383. DOI
	Liotti, M., Woldorff, M. G., Perez III, R., & Mayberg, H. S.. An ERP study of the temporal course of the stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia, 2000, 38 (5): 701- 711. DOI
	Lundholm, H.. The affective tone of lines: Experimental researches. Psychological Review, 1921, 28 (1): 43- 60. DOI
	Martin, A. E., & Slepian, M. L.. The primacy of gender: Gendered cognition underlies the big two dimensions of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021, 16 (6): 1143- 1158. DOI
	Miller, C. L.. Developmental changes in male/female voice classification by infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 1983, 6 (2−3): 313- 330. DOI
	Oliveri, M. E., & Reiss, D.. Families’ schemata of social relationships. Family Process, 1982, 21 (3): 295- 311. DOI
	Osgood, C. E.. The cross-cultural generality of visual-verbal synesthetic tendencies. Behavioral Science, 1960, 5 (2): 146- 169.
	Palumbo, L., Ruta, N., & Bertamini, M.. Comparing angular and curved shapes in terms of implicit associations and approach/avoidance responses. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10 (10): e0140043. DOI
	Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N.. Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 1998, 9 (1): 45- 48. DOI
	Schneider, I. K., Rutjens, B. T., Jostmann, N. B., & Lakens, D.. Weighty matters: Importance literally feels heavy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2011, 2 (5): 474- 478. DOI
	Silton, R. L., Heller, W., Towers, D. N., Engels, A. S., Spielberg, J. M., Edgar, J. C., ... Miller, G. A. The time course of activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex during top-down attentional control. NeuroImage, 2010, 50 (3): 1292- 1302. DOI
	Slepian, M. L., & Galinsky, A. D.. The voiced pronunciation of initial phonemes predicts the gender of names. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2016, 110 (4): 509- 527. DOI
	Stroessner, S. J., Benitez, J., Perez, M. A., Wyman, A. B., Carpinella, C. M., & Johnson, K. L.. What’s in a shape? Evidence of gender category associations with basic forms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2020, 87, 103915. DOI
	Wang, W. F., Qi, M. M., & Gao, H. M.. An ERP investigation of the working memory Stroop effect. Neuropsychologia, 2021, 152, 107752. DOI
	Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M.. Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2004, 16 (7): 1272- 1288. DOI
	Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A.. Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 2008, 322 (5901): 606- 607. DOI
	Xiao, X., Xie, P., & Zhang, Q. L.. Brain potentials associated with the shape Stroop effect. NeuroReport, 2016, 27 (5): 306- 310. DOI
	Zadra, J. R., & Clore, G. L.. Emotion and perception: The role of affective information. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2011, 2 (6): 676- 685. DOI
	Zhu, X. Y., Huang, Y. B., Liu, W. X., Yu, Z., Duan, Y., He, X. Y., & Zhang, W.. Keeping morality “on the straight” and never “on the bend”: Metaphorical representations of moral concepts in straightness and curvature. Behavioral Sciences, 2023, 13 (4): 295. DOI

[1]	赵思怡, 李莹, 王悦. 情绪效价−空间动作隐喻联结对成人和儿童外语情绪词学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 153-159.
[2]	贺晓玲, 刘奕晴, 那琳娜. 3～5岁幼儿颜色映射道德和权力概念的认知发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 636-641.
[3]	宋宜琪, 杨婉晴, 梁丹丹. 6～8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童空间概念“大”的隐喻映射研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 460-465.
[4]	贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.
[5]	李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[6]	张潮, 刘赛芳, 隋玲, 乔园园. 宽容概念的大小隐喻表征：双向性及社会性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 824-830.
[7]	毛晓翎, 王分分, 曹静, 祝卓宏. 多范例训练提升儿童隐喻理解能力的干预性研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 675-682.
[8]	李莹, 吴军, 梁园园, 王悦. 不同性质汉语否定句心理加工过程的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 309-316.
[9]	方溦,葛列众,甘甜. 道德具身认知的理论研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 765-772.
[10]	张颖颖, 于方静, 周治金, 陈宝国. 汉语时间-空间隐喻加工垂直偏向性的稳固性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 446-462.
[11]	吴念阳，陈纤纤，吴燕，钱海燕. 5-7岁儿童绘画中社会地位的“大/小”隐喻表征^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 50-56.
[12]	汪新筱, 张积家, 王悦. 时间空间隐喻在汉语动词语义加工中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 744-750.
[13]	李艾丽莎,；胡竹菁；张庆林4. 决策权力和社会角色对混合动机冲突决策的影响[J]. , 2011, 9(2): 115-119.