农村儿童创造力与内、外化问题行为的关系

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.04.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究选取339名农村公立小学四年级儿童为研究对象，旨在考察儿童创造力与内、外化问题行为之间的关系。结果显示：(1)独创性与适用性显著负相关；(2)独创性与适用性均显著负向预测内化问题行为；(3)独创性显著负向预测外化问题行为，并且存在独创性与适用性的显著交互效应，表现为独创性对外化问题行为的负向预测作用仅在高适用性水平下显著。本研究结果有助于理解在农村背景下儿童创造力与问题行为的关系。

关键词: 创造力, 问题行为, 独创性, 适用性

Abstract:

The present study recruited a sample of 339 fourth-grade students from rural public primary schools to examine the association between children’s creativity and internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors. After controlling for gender and intelligence, the results showed the following: 1) there was a negative correlation between originality and appropriateness; 2) both originality and appropriateness significantly negatively predicted internalizing problem behaviors; 3) originality significantly negatively predicted externalizing problem behaviors, with a significant interaction effect observed between originality and appropriateness, which indicates that the negative predictive effect of originality on externalizing problem behaviors is only significant at high levels of appropriateness. The results of this study help us understand the relations between children’s creativity and problem behaviors in rural settings.

Key words: creativity, problem behaviors, originality, appropriateness

周淑金, 韩宪国, 李丹, 陈欣银, 周佳茜, 陈小鹏, 罗俊龙. 农村儿童创造力与内、外化问题行为的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(4): 486-493.

Shujin ZHOU, Xianguo HAN, Dan LI, Xinyin CHEN, Jiaxi ZHOU, Xiaopeng CHEN, Junlong LUO. Relations Between Creativity and Internalizing and Externalizing Problem Behaviors in Rural Children[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(4): 486-493.

图/表 4

参考文献 0

	方杰, 温忠麟. 基于结构方程模型的有调节的中介效应分析. 心理科学, 2018, 41 (2): 453- 458.
	谷传华, 周宗奎, 种明慧. 小学儿童社会创造性与其同伴关系、学业成绩的关系. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25 (3): 20- 25.
	胡卫平, 韩琴. 小学生创造性科学问题提出能力的发展研究. 心理科学, 2006, 29 (4): 944- 946, 928. DOI
	李秀菊, 王丽慧, 陈玲. 小学生创造性想象力的发展趋势研究. 科普研究, 2014, 9 (6): 5- 10, 18. DOI
	张景焕, 付萌萌, 辛于雯, 陈佩佩, 沙莎. 小学高年级学生创造力的发展: 性别差异及学校支持的作用. 心理学报, 2020, 52 (9): 1057- 1070.
	周淑金, 刘萍, 罗俊龙, 王静, 李丹. 新颖性与适用性在广告再认中的提取模式差异. 心理科学, 2020, 43 (4): 925- 930.
	Adair, W. L., & Xiong, T. X. How Chinese and Caucasian Canadians conceptualize creativity: The mediating role of uncertainty avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2018, 49 (2): 223- 238. DOI
	Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
	Amabile, T. M. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45 (2): 357- 376. DOI
	Barbot, B., Lubart, T. I., & Besançon, M. (2016). “Peaks, slumps, and bumps”: Individual differences in the development of creativity in children and adolescents. In B. Barbot (Ed.), Perspectives on creativity development (pp. 33–45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
	Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 2014, 46, 73- 83. DOI
	Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. K. Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 1999, 12 (3): 185- 195. DOI
	Chen, X. Y., Cen, G. Z., Li, D., & He, Y. F. Social functioning and adjustment in Chinese children: The imprint of historical time. Child Development, 2005, 76 (1): 182- 195. DOI
	Chen, X. Y., Fu, R., Li, D., Liu, J. S., Liu, S. H., & Cui, L. Y. Acculturation and adjustment among rural migrant children in urban China: A longitudinal study. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2021, 13 (3): 559- 577. DOI
	Chi, S. A., Kim, S. H., & Kim, H. J. Problem behaviours of kindergartners: The affects of children’s cognitive ability, creativity, and self-esteem. South African Journal of Education, 2016, 36 (1): 1- 10.
	DeMoss, K., Milich, R., & DeMers, S. Gender, creativity, depression, and attributional style in adolescents with high academic ability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1993, 21 (4): 455- 467. DOI
	Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 2010, 136 (5): 822- 848. DOI
	Fancourt, D., & Steptoe, A. Effects of creativity on social and behavioral adjustment in 7- to 11-year-old children. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2019, 1438 (1): 30- 39. DOI
	Fox, J. E., & Schirrmacher, R. (2012). Art & creative development for young children (7th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Inc.
	Fu, C., Niu, H., & Wang, M. F. Parental corporal punishment and children’s problem behaviors: The moderating effects of parental inductive reasoning in China. Children and Youth Services Review, 2019, 99, 1- 9. DOI
	Graham, J. W. Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 2009, 60 (1): 549- 576. DOI
	Gralewski, J., Lebuda, I., Gajda, A., Jankowska, D. M., & Wiśniewska, E. Slumps and jumps: Another look at developmental changes in creative abilities. Creativity. Theories-Research-Applications, 2016, 3 (1): 152- 177. DOI
	Guilford, J. P. Creativity. American Psychologist, 1950, 5 (9): 444- 454. DOI
	Hanley, A. W., & Garland, E. L. Dispositional mindfulness co-varies with self-reported positive reappraisal. Personality and Individual Differences, 2014, 66, 146- 152. DOI
	Hao, N., Xue, H., Yuan, H., Wang, Q., & Runco, M. A. Enhancing creativity: Proper body posture meets proper emotion. Acta Psychologica, 2017, 173, 32- 40. DOI
	Harris, D. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2015). Fast and furious: The influence of implicit aggression, premeditation, and provoking situations on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 54–164.
	Harvey, S., & Berry, J. W. Toward a meta-theory of creativity forms: How novelty and usefulness shape creativity. Academy of Management Review, 2023, 48 (3): 504- 529. DOI
	Hightower, A. D., Work, W. C., Cowen, E. L., Lotyczewski, B. S., Spinell, A. P., Guare, J. C., & Rohrbeck, C. A. The teacher-child rating scale: A brief objective measure of elementary children’s school problem behaviors and competencies. School Psychology Review, 1986, 15 (3): 393- 409. DOI
	Huang, F. R., Fan, J., & Luo, J. The neural basis of novelty and appropriateness in processing of creative chunk decomposition. NeuroImage, 2015, 113, 122- 132. DOI
	Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-development approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory and research and social issues (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt, Rienhart, and Winston.
	Lane, J. D., Ronfard, S., Francioli, S. P., & Harris, P. L. Children’s imagination and belief: Prone to flights of fancy or grounded in reality. Cognition, 2016, 152, 127- 140. DOI
	Little, R. J. A. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1988, 83 (404): 1198- 1202. DOI
	Liu, X. S., Fu, R., Li, D., Liu, J. S., & Chen, X. Y. Self- and group-orientations and adjustment in urban and rural Chinese children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2018, 49 (9): 1440- 1456. DOI
	Lu, X. L., & Kaiser, G. Creativity in students’ modelling competencies: Conceptualisation and measurement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2022, 109 (2): 287- 311. DOI
	Lüdeke, S., Linderkamp, F., Baumann, T., & Lembke, E. J. Empirical analysis of creativity in children and adolescents with internalizing and externalizing problem behavior. Child & Youth Care Forum, 2020, 49 (4): 603- 621.
	Maslowsky, J., Jager, J., & Hemken, D. Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2015, 39 (1): 87- 96. DOI
	McCarthy, M., Chen, C. C., & McNamee, R. C. Novelty and usefulness trade-off: Cultural cognitive differences and creative idea evaluation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2018, 49 (2): 171- 198. DOI
	Mouchiroud, C., & Lubart, T. Children’s original thinking: An empirical examination of alternative measures derived from divergent thinking tasks. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2001, 162 (4): 382- 401. DOI
	Niu, W. H., & Kaufman, J. C. Creativity of Chinese and American cultures: A synthetic analysis. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2013, 47 (1): 77- 87. DOI
	Paek, S. H., Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. A meta-analysis of the relationship between three common psychopathologies—ADHD, anxiety, and depression—and indicators of little-c creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2016, 60 (2): 117- 133. DOI
	Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 2004, 39 (2): 83- 96. DOI
	Robson, S. The analysing children’s creative thinking framework: Development of an observation-led approach to identifying and analysing young children’s creative thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 2014, 40 (1): 121- 134. DOI
	Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 2012, 24 (1): 92- 96. DOI
	Scott, C. L. Teachers’ biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 1999, 12 (4): 321- 328. DOI
	Shen, W. B., Yuan, Y., Yi, B. S., Liu, C., & Zhan, H. J. A theoretical and critical examination on the relationship between creativity and morality. Current Psychology, 2019, 38 (2): 469- 485. DOI
	Silvia, P. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Creativity and mental illness. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 381–394). New York: Cambridge University.
	Smith, R. E., Chen, J. M., & Yang, X. J. The impact of advertising creativity on the hierarchy of effects. Journal of Advertising, 2008, 37 (4): 47- 62. DOI
	Storme, M., Çelik, P., Camargo, A., Forthmann, B., Holling, H., & Lubart, T. The effect of forced language switching during divergent thinking: A study on bilinguals’ originality of ideas. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8, 2086. DOI
	Tacher, E. L., & Readdick, C. A. The relation between aggression and creativity among second graders. Creativity Research Journal, 2006, 18 (3): 261- 267. DOI
	Tan, C. S., Tan, S. A., Mohd Hashim, I. H., Lee, M. N., Ong, A. W. H., & Yaacob, S. N. B. Problem-solving ability and stress mediate the relationship between creativity and happiness. Creativity Research Journal, 2019, 31 (1): 15- 25. DOI
	Torrance, E. P. A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 1968, 12 (4): 195- 199. DOI
	Wang, X. F., & Cheng, Z. S. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. CHEST, 158(Suppl.1), S65–S71.
	Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
	Zhou, S. J., Luo, J. L., Yu, T. T., Li, D., Yin, Y., & Tang, X. C. Towards a neural model of creative evaluation in advertising: An electrophysiological study. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10 (1): 21958. DOI
	Zhou, S. J., Xu, X. P., Li, D., Luo, J. L., & Zhang, M. M. Joint developmental trajectories of novelty and usefulness in Chinese children’s creativity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2024, 53 (3): 609- 620. DOI
	Zhou, S. J., Yin, Y., Yu, T. T., Stupple, E. J. N., & Luo, J. L. Exploring the experience of novelty when viewing creative adverts: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, 9, 471. DOI

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5
1. 独创性	3.25	0.65
2. 适用性	3.31	0.62	−0.39***
3. 外化问题行为	0.00	1.00	−0.10	0.11*
4. 内化问题行为	0.00	1.00	−0.26***	0.01	−0.06
5. 性别	0.44	0.50	0.12*	0.02	−0.24***	−0.03
6. IQ	101.68	11.60	0.31***	−0.18**	−0.03	−0.25***	−0.02

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5
1. 独创性	3.25	0.65
2. 适用性	3.31	0.62	−0.39***
3. 外化问题行为	0.00	1.00	−0.10	0.11*
4. 内化问题行为	0.00	1.00	−0.26***	0.01	−0.06
5. 性别	0.44	0.50	0.12*	0.02	−0.24***	−0.03
6. IQ	101.68	11.60	0.31***	−0.18**	−0.03	−0.25***	−0.02

变量	β	SE	t	95%CI
外化问题行为
性别	−0.27	0.05	−5.36***	[−0.36, −0.17]
IQ	0.00	0.07	0.03	[−0.13, 0.13]
独创性	−0.22	0.10	−2.29*	[−0.41, −0.03]
适用性	−0.09	0.10	−0.94	[−0.29, 0.10]
独创性×适用性	−0.19	0.07	−2.65**	[−0.34, −0.05]
内化问题行为
性别	0.02	0.06	0.29	[−0.10, 0.13]
IQ	−0.17	0.07	−2.41*	[−0.30, −0.03]
独创性	−0.45	0.13	−3.57***	[−0.70, −0.20]
适用性	−0.29	0.12	−2.37*	[−0.53, −0.05]
独创性×适用性	0.03	0.06	0.50	[−0.09, 0.15]

变量	β	SE	t	95%CI
外化问题行为
性别	−0.27	0.05	−5.36***	[−0.36, −0.17]
IQ	0.00	0.07	0.03	[−0.13, 0.13]
独创性	−0.22	0.10	−2.29*	[−0.41, −0.03]
适用性	−0.09	0.10	−0.94	[−0.29, 0.10]
独创性×适用性	−0.19	0.07	−2.65**	[−0.34, −0.05]
内化问题行为
性别	0.02	0.06	0.29	[−0.10, 0.13]
IQ	−0.17	0.07	−2.41*	[−0.30, −0.03]
独创性	−0.45	0.13	−3.57***	[−0.70, −0.20]
适用性	−0.29	0.12	−2.37*	[−0.53, −0.05]
独创性×适用性	0.03	0.06	0.50	[−0.09, 0.15]

[1]	许航, 史新广, 段锦云, 卢红旭. 感恩对恶意创造力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(4): 470-477.
[2]	周玉兰, 王云峰, 宋战兵, 楼佳颖, 李锐. 运动能力与留守儿童问题行为的关系：身体活动和久坐行为的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 372-378.
[3]	曹贤才, 潘姝玮, 王大华, 白学军. 一般依恋、父母依恋与青少年抑郁和问题行为的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 46-54.
[4]	韩迎春, 王琳萱. 有氧运动、情绪与创造力：流体智力的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 100-107.
[5]	白博仁, 周详, 张婧婧, 崔虞馨. 人工智能自恋提升人机合作创新意愿及其机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 137-144.
[6]	张克, 杜秀敏, 李立言, 张雪寒, 赵海霞. 酸味与创造力的关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 815-823.
[7]	刘啸莳, 李静雯, 张蕾, 项珵, 吴芸. 主观社会经济地位与心理幸福感的关系：创造力的中介和安全感的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 138-144.
[8]	尹霞云, 朱康慈, 黎志华. 家庭功能对低收入家庭儿童外化问题行为的影响：同伴关系与希望的链式中介[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(6): 775-781.
[9]	石鑫欣, 吴怡霏, 冯迎. 父母差别对待与青少年问题行为的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 644-650.
[10]	邢晓沛, 焦梦涵, 肖宇苑, 胡夏. 父母心理攻击与小学中高年级儿童问题行为的关系：儿童愤怒和悲伤管理的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 479-486.
[11]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[12]	黄鹤, 王小英, 吕博. 家庭累积风险与流动学前儿童的问题行为：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 779-785.
[13]	马玲玲, 余鸿燕, 范为桥, 孟小. 父母教养方式与随迁儿童问题行为关系的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 334-340.
[14]	杜夏雨, 史从戎, 赵子仪, 薛婷. 情绪效价和动机情绪对创造力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 160-165.
[15]	李甜甜, 顾吉有, 徐鹤文. 父亲抑郁对幼儿问题行为的影响：教养效能感和教养方式的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 66-73.