中文单字词句的阅读知觉广度*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3): 298-303.

中文单字词句的阅读知觉广度^*

仝文^1，2，刘妮娜¹，伏干³，闫国利¹

1 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心，天津 300074
2.山西省朔州师范高等专科学校，朔州 036000；
3 盐城师范学院教育科学学院，江苏 22400

收稿日期:2014-03-03 出版日期:2014-05-20 发布日期:2014-03-25
通讯作者: 闫国利，男，天津师范大学心理与行为研究院教授，博士生导师。
作者简介:仝文，男，天津师范大学心理与行为研究院博士研究生。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家社会科学基金项目(10BYY029)、江苏省社会科学基金青年专项(11YYD017)和天津市高校“中青年骨干创新人才培养计划”的资助。

The Perceptual Span in Chinese When Reading Sentence Constructed by One-Character Words

Tong Wen^1,2,Liu Nina¹,Fu Gan³,Yan Guoli¹

1 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Center of Cooperative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of National Mental Health,Tianjin 300073;
2 Shuozhou Advanced Normal College,Shuozhou 036000;
3 School of Educational Science, Yancheng Teachers College, Jiangsu 224001

Received:2014-03-03 Online:2014-05-20 Published:2014-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过考察中文单字词句的阅读知觉广度来探讨中文阅读的基本加工单元问题。实验采用“呈现随眼动变化”技术——移动窗口范式，记录了20名大学生阅读120个单字词句时的眼动行为，其中实验材料分5种窗口条件呈现。实验结果显示，单字词句的右侧阅读知觉广度为2个单字词，小于以往知觉广度的研究结果。中文阅读的基本加工单元可能是词。

关键词: 单字词句, 中文阅读, 知觉广度

Abstract: The question concerning the basic processing unit in Chinese reading is a controversial issue. The present study examines this question by investigating the perceptual span when reading sentences that consisted entirely of one-character words. The moving window paradigm was used in this experiment. 120 sentences were presented in four different window conditions (L1R1, L1R2, L1R3, L1R4) and one normal condition. 20 participants’ data were collected. The results showed that the perceptual span was 2 characters to the right in these specific sentences. Prior research (CITATION) shows that when using sentences with words of varying lengths the perceptual span extends up to three characters to the right of fixation. The fact that the window was smaller with exclusively one-character words suggests the window is determined in terms of numbers of words, rather than characters. To some extent, it provides evidence that the unit of Chinese reading processing is based on words instead of the characters.

Key words: one-character word, Chinese reading, perceptual span

中图分类号:

B842.5

仝文，刘妮娜，伏干，闫国利. 中文单字词句的阅读知觉广度^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 298-303.

Tong Wen,Liu Nina,Fu Gan,Yan Guoli. The Perceptual Span in Chinese When Reading Sentence Constructed by One-Character Words[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(3): 298-303.

参考文献

伏干,闫国利. (2013).初中二年级学生字词阅读知觉广度的眼动研究.心理科学,36(2),284-289.
伏干,闫国利. (2008).高中二年级学生双字词阅读知觉广度的眼动研究.心理与行为研究,6(4),285-290.
刘志方,张智君,赵亚军. (2011).汉语阅读中眼跳目标选择单元以及词汇加工方式:来自消失文本的实验证据.心理学报,43(6),608-618.
李兴珊,刘萍萍,马国杰. (2011).中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评.心理科学进展, 19(4),459-470.
乔静芝,张兰兰,闫国利. (2011).聋人与健听大学生汉语阅读知觉广度的比较研究.应用心理学, 17(3),249-258.
熊建萍,闫国利,白学军. (2007).高中二年级学生中文阅读知觉广度的眼动研究.心理与行为研究, 5(1),60-64.
闫国利,伏干,白学军. (2008).不同难度阅读材料对阅读知觉广度影响的眼动研究.心理科学, 31(6),1287-1290.
闫国利,白学军. (2007).汉语阅读的眼动研究.心理与行为研究, 5(3),229-234.
闫国利,王丽红,巫金根,白学军. (2011).不同年级学生阅读知觉广度及预视效益的眼动研究.心理学报,43(3),249-263.
闫国利,巫金根,臧传丽,白学军.(2010). 阅读知觉广度眼动研究述评. 心理学探新,30(2),23-28.
闫国利,熊建萍,白学军. (2008).小学五年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究.心理发展与教育, 24(1),72-77.
闫国利,张巧明,白学军.(2013).中文阅读知觉广度的影响因素研究.心理发展与教育, 29(2),121-130.
张巧明,王爱云,闫国利.(2013).大学生阅读知觉广度影响因素的回归分析.心理与行为研究,11(2),190-194.
郑昭明. (1981).汉字认知的历程. 中华心理学刊, 23,137-153.
Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., ＆ Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277-1287.
Chen, H-C., ＆ Tang, C. (1998). The effective visual field in reading Chinese. Reading and Writing, 10, 245-254.
Henderson J. M., ＆ Ferreira F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal Experiment Psychology: Learning Memory Cognition,16 (3),417-29.
Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Inhoff, A. W., ＆ Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20-34.
Li, X. S., ＆ Logan, G. (2008). Object-based attention in Chinese readers of Chinese words: Beyond Gestalt principles. Psychonomic Bulletin ＆ Review, 15, 945-949.
Li, X., Liu, P., ＆ Rayner, K. (2011).Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51, 1146-1156.
McConkie, G. W., ＆ Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception ＆ Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211-236.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
Rayner, K., Liversedge, S. P., ＆ White, S. J. (2006). Eye movements when reading disappearing text: The importance of the word to the right of fixation. Vision Research, 46, 310-323.
Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., ＆ Yang, J. M. (2009). Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger reader. Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 755-760.
Rayner, K. ＆ Pollatsek, A. ( 1989 ). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Shen, D., Bai, X., Yan, G., ＆ Liversedge, S. P. ( 2008 ). The perceptual span in Chinese reading. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X., Bai, ＆ G. Yan (Eds.). Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements ( pp. 255-276). Tianjin: Tianjin Peoples Publishing House.
Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., ＆ Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 259-268.
Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Riehter, E., Nuthmann, A., ＆ Shu, H.(2010).Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology, 63,705-725.

[1]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[2]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[3]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[4]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾. 高、低汉语水平藏–汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 297-303,333.
[5]	巫金根, 刘志方, 刘妮娜, 黄发杰. 高低水平汉英二语者阅读难易英语句子的知觉广度[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 460-465.
[6]	张慢慢, 张志超, 臧传丽. 跳读是基于副中央凹词的部分加工还是完全加工？[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 311-317.
[7]	仝文, 任梦雪, 刘志方, 冯笑. 词长对中文阅读眼跳目标选择的影响：眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 168-175.
[8]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 屈青青. 汉字位置加工的词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 193-199.
[9]	刘志方, 陈朝阳, 仝文, 苏衡. 阅读中词汇识别依赖词内字序编码的阶段性特点：眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 304-310.
[10]	刘志方王若逸，张智君，刘炜. 中文阅读中基于字、词的眼跳目标选择策略：来自消失文本方面的证据^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 27-35.
[11]	闫国利, 何立媛, 宋子明. 中文阅读的基本信息加工单元初探^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 120-126.
[12]	马谐, 刘佳, 刘艳, 陶云, 张秋月, 陈睿. 背景音乐对中—英文阅读理解的影响效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 472-478.
[13]	李韵静, 张红葵, 白柳, 王越, 程小云, 范宏玮, 闫国利. 小学五年级学生英语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 225-229.
[14]	王丽红, 白学军, 闫国利. 汉语阅读知觉广度的老化：一项眼动研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(6): 763-768.
[15]	张巧明，崔磊. 小学生对不同词语类型预视加工的发展^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 645-651.