嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用眼动追踪技术，采用边界范式，考察了三字嵌套词的汉字位置加工是否存在亚词边界效应。实验以三字前嵌套词（如“历史系”）和三字后嵌套词（如“核技术”）为靶子，对次字和尾字进行操纵（相同、转置和替换）。结果发现：对于前嵌套词，靶子的注视时间在替换条件显著长于转置条件，相同条件和转置条件差异不显著；对于后嵌套词，靶子的注视时间在转置条件显著长于相同条件，替换条件和转置条件差异不显著。结果表明：跨亚词边界汉字转置不影响词汇识别，而亚词首字转置干扰词汇识别。

关键词: 汉字位置, 嵌套词, 中文阅读, 眼动

Abstract: In the present study, we endeavored to explore whether the sub-word boundary effect exists in character position processing of incremental words in Chinese. We used the head-embedded incremental word (e.g., 历史系) and tail-embedded incremental word (e.g., 核技术) as our targets. We embedded the target words into sentences and then manipulated the previews of the words using the boundary paradigm. The preview was identical to the target word (identity condition), had the last two characters of the target word transposed (TC condition), or had the last two characters that were different from those in the target word (SC condition). For the head-embedded incremental word, the fixation durations on the targets in the SC condition were much longer than those in the TC condition, but were not significantly different between the identity condition and TC condition. For the tail-embedded incremental word, the fixation durations on the targets in the TC condition were much longer than those in the identity condition, but were not significantly different between the SC condition and TC condition. These results indicate that transposing two characters across sub-word boundaries have no effect on word recognition. However, word identification is inhibited when the beginning character of embedded words is involved in transposition.

Key words: character position, incremental words, Chinese reading, eye movement

中图分类号:

B842

顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.

GU Junjuan, GAO Zhihua, MA Shaoyang. The Sub-Word Boundary Effect of Chinese Character Position Processing in Incremental Words[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.

参考文献

顾俊娟, 高志华, 屈青青. (2020). 汉字位置加工的词边界效应. 心理与行为研究, 18(2), 193–199
顾俊娟, 石金富. (2021). 汉字位置加工和词边界效应的认知机制. 心理科学进展, 29(2), 191–201
滑慧敏, 顾俊娟, 林楠, 李兴珊. (2017). 视觉词汇识别中的字符位置编码. 心理科学进展, 25(7), 1132–1138
李馨, 白学军, 闫国利. (2011). 词边界信息和词频在汉语阅读中的作用. 心理与行为研究, 9(2), 133–139
张慢慢, 臧传丽, 徐宇峰, 白学军, 闫国利. (2020). 快速与慢速读者的中央凹加工对副中央凹预视的影响. 心理学报, 52(8), 933–945
Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1277–1287, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277.
Davis, C. J., & Taft, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 904–910.
Gu, J. J., & Li, X. S. (2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(1), 272–281.
Gu, J. J., Li, X. S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Character order processing in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 127–137, doi: 10.1037/a0038639.
Johnson, R. L. (2007). The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 425–440). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1), 209–229, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209.
Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2009). Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 1–18.
Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139–1162, doi: 10.1037/rev0000248.
Li, X. S., Gu, J. J., Liu, P. P., & Rayner, K. (2013). The advantage of word-based processing in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 879–889.
Marcet, A., Perea, M., Baciero, A., & Gomez, P. (2019). Can letter position encoding be modified by visual perceptual elements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(6), 1344–1353, doi: 10.1177/1747021818789876.
Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Parafoveal preprocessing of word initial trigrams during reading in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 411–432.
Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130(2), 127–137, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.001.
Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55(6), 384–393, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384.
Perea, M., Marcet, A., & Gómez, P. (2016). How do Scrabble players encode letter position during reading. Psicothema, 28(1), 7–12.
Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(2), 301–314.
Perea, M., Winskel, H., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012). On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: The case of Thai. Experimental Psychology, 59(2), 68–73, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000127.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81, doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(4), 745–765, doi: 10.1080/02724980343000477.
Taft, M., Xu, J., & Li, S. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 14–25, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.002.
Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2015). Children’s and adults’ parafoveal processes in German: Phonological and orthographic effects. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 531–548, doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.999076.
White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word-beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1261–1276, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1261.
Winskel, H., & Perea, M. (2013). Consonant/vowel asymmetries in letter position coding during normal reading: Evidence from parafoveal previews in Thai. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 119–130, doi: 10.1080/20445911.2012.753077.
Zang, C., Liang, F., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Interword spacing and landing position effects during Chinese reading in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 720–734, doi: 10.1037/a0030097.
Zhou, J., & Li, X. (2021). On the segmentation of Chinese incremental words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(8), 1353–1368.
Zhou, J. Y., Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Taft, M. (2018). The time course of incremental word processing during Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 31(3), 607–625, doi: 10.1007/s11145-017-9800-y.

[1]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 593-599.
[2]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[3]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[4]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[5]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[6]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[7]	刘璐, 姜雅梅, 张巧明, 李诸洋. 义符位置与语义透明度对形声字语义激活的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[8]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[9]	张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.
[10]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾. 高、低汉语水平藏–汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 297-303,333.
[11]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.
[12]	康立超, 兰泽波, 韩映虹. 不同阅读方式下图画书重复阅读对4～5岁幼儿文字关注影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 368-374.
[13]	何立媛, 田雪, 李悦, 沈凤丹, 王永胜, 吴捷. 无关言语影响老年人阅读过程的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 375-381.
[14]	乌仁其木格, 赵傲雪, 汪钰涵, 庄想灵, 马国杰. “找茬”任务中的视野偏好与参照策略[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 166-171.
[15]	王永胜, 罗雨娇, 韩洋, 刘妮娜, 李馨, 白学军. 语境线索在留学生阅读伴随词汇学习中的作用：来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 618-623,651.