组织认同问卷（OIQ）在教师样本中的修订

心理与行为研究 ›› 2008, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3): 176-181.

组织认同问卷（OIQ）在教师样本中的修订

李永鑫,申继亮,张娜

北京师范大学发展心理所,北京 100875

收稿日期:2007-12-05 出版日期:2008-09-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
通讯作者: 申继亮,男,北京师范大学发展心理所教授,博士生导师。Email: jlshen@bnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:李永鑫,男,河南大学心理与行为研究所副教授,北京师范大学发展心理所博士后。
基金资助:
本研究得到全国教育科学规划“十一五”基金BBA060013项目和河南省高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划项目的资助

REVISIONING ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TEACHERS

Li Yongxin,Shen Jiliang,Zhang Na

Institute of Departmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received:2007-12-05 Online:2008-09-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在两个教师群体样本中,对Cheney编制的组织认同问卷（OIQ）进行修订。对338名中小学教师施测结果的探索性因素分析表明,教师组织认同为单因素结构模型;对256名高校教师施测结果的验证性因素分析支持了单因素模型的观点。在两个样本中,教师组织认同问卷的内部一致性系数均为0.92;教师组织认同问卷的内容效度和效标效度良好。

关键词: 组织认同, 情感承诺, 自尊

Abstract: Organizational identification as a specific form of social identification is the perception of oneness with or belongingness to an organization. The present study was designed to revise the Organization Identification Questionnaire(OIQ)developed by Cheney in two teacher samples. OIQ was administered to 338 primary or secondary school teachers and 256 college teachers. The result suggest that one-factor model is suitable to the OIQ in 338 primary or secondary school teachers, and the result are also validated in 256 college teachers. The Cronbach′s alpha coefficient of the OIQ in two teacher samples are 0.92. The content validity and criterion validity of the OIQ are acceptable.

Key words: organizational identification, organizational commitment, self-esteem

中图分类号:

B849: C93

李永鑫,申继亮,张娜. 组织认同问卷（OIQ）在教师样本中的修订[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(3): 176-181.

Li Yongxin,Shen Jiliang,Zhang Na. REVISIONING ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TEACHERS[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2008, 6(3): 176-181.

参考文献

[1] Ashforth B E, Mael F. Social identity theory and organization. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(1): 20~39
[2] Browen M E. Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14(3): 346~355
[3] Riketta M. Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2005, 66: 358~384
[4] Meger J P, Becker T E, Dick V R. Social identities and commitments a work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(3): 665~683
[5] Feather N T, Rauter K A. Organizational citizenship behaviors in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2004, 77: 81~94
[6] Knipperberg D V, Schie E C. Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2000, 73: 137~147
[7] Dick R V, Christ O, Stellmacher J, et al. Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. British Journal of Management, 2004, 15: 35~360
[8] Bell S J, Mengue B. The employee-organization relationship, organizational citizenship behaviors, and superiors service quality. Journal of Retailing, 2002, 78: 131~146
[9] Cheney G. On the various and changing meaning of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 1983, 50: 342~362
[10] Mael F A, Ashforth B E. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1992, 13(2): 103~123
[11] Shamir B, Kark R A. Single-item graphic scale for the measurement of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2004, 77: 115~123
[12] Christ O, Dick R V, Wagner U, et al. When teachers go the extra mile: Foci of organizational identification as determinants of different forms of organizational citizenship behavior among schoolteachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, 73: 329~341
[13] 凌文辁, 张治灿, 方俐洛. 中国职工组织承诺研究. 中国社会科学, 2001, 2: 90~102
[14] 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘等. 心理卫生评定量表手册（增订版）. 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999
[15] Corcoran K J. Measuring burnout: A reliability and convergent validity study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1986, 1: 107~112
[16] Barge J K, Schlueter D W. A critical evaluation of organizational commitment and identification. Management Communication Quarterly. 1988, 2(1): 116~133
[17] Gautam T, Dick R V, Wagner U. Organizational identification and organizational commitment: Distinct aspects of two related concepts. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2004, 7: 301~315
[18] Barker J R, Tompkins P K. Identification in the self-managing organization characteristics of target and tenure. Human Communication Research, 1994, 21(2): 223~240
[19] Van Dick R. Identification in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organization psychology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2001, 3(4): 265~283
[20] Mael F A, Ashforth B E. Identification in work, war, sports, and religion: Contrasting the benefits and risks. Journal for the theory of Social Behaviour. 2001, 31(2): 197~222