首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据

梁菲菲; 向颖; 龙梦灵

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.005

心理与行为研究 >

2022 , Vol. 20 >Issue 3: 318 - 324

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.005

基础心理学

首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据

梁菲菲 ,
向颖 ,
龙梦灵

展开

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300387;
2. 天津师范大学心理学部，天津 300387;
3. 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387

收稿日期: 2021-12-02

网络出版日期: 2022-05-20

基金资助

教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目（21YJA190004）

收起

Initial Character Positional Probability Does Not Influence Word Segmentation in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Parafoveal Processing

LIANG Feifei ,
XIANG Ying ,
LONG Mengling

Expand

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387

Received date: 2021-12-02

Online published: 2022-05-20

Fold

摘要

本研究采用边界范式，考察汉语阅读中读者是否在副中央凹处利用首词素的位置概率信息进行词切分和词识别。采用2（首词素位置概率：高、低）×２（预视类型：相同预视、假字预视）的被试内实验设计，以双字词为目标词，记录大学生阅读句子时的眼动轨迹。结果发现，在跳读率和第一遍阅读的眼动指标中，被试在高、低首词素位置概率条件中获得的预视效益量无显著差异。该结果表明，读者并未在副中央凹处加工首词素的位置概率信息。结合前期研究推断，首词素位置概率信息没有作用于汉语阅读的词切分和词识别。

关键词： 词素位置概率; 词切分; 副中央凹加工; 汉语阅读

本文引用格式

梁菲菲 , 向颖 , 龙梦灵 . 首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022 , 20(3) : 318 -324 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.005

Abstract

We manipulated the initial character positional probability of two-character word and preview type using boundary paradigm, in order to answer whether Chinese readers are sensitive to the information of word initial character’s positional probability during word segmentation and word identification in natural Chinese reading. Two-character words were selected as target words. The initial character’s positional probability was manipulated as being either high or low, and the final character was kept identical across the two conditions. We recorded adults’ eye movements when they read sentences containing these words. The results showed that preview benefits did not differ in the high-probability and low-probability conditions for skipping probability and the measures of first pass reading, demonstrating that Chinese readiness did not use word initial character positional probability in parafovea for word segmentation and word identification in Chinese reading.

Key words： character positional probability; word segmentation; parafoveal processing; Chinese reading

参考文献

李兴珊, 刘萍萍, 马国杰. (2011). 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评. 心理科学进展, 19(4), 459–470
王永胜, 白学军, 臧传丽, 高晓雷, 郭志英, 闫国利. (2016). 副中央凹中字N+2的预视对汉语阅读眼跳目标选择影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 48(1), 1–11
张慢慢, 臧传丽, 白学军. (2020). 中文阅读中副中央凹预加工的范围与程度. 心理科学进展, 28(6), 871–882
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 802–814.
Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1277–1287, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5(6), e10729, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729.
Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 696–713.
Johnson, N. F., & Pugh, K. R. (1994). A cohort model of visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 240–346, doi: 10.1006/cogp.1994.1008.
Kasisopa, B., Reilly, R. G., Luksaneeyanawin, S., & Burnham, D. (2013). Eye movements while reading an unspaced writing system: The case of Thai. Vision Research, 86, 71–80, doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.007.
Kasisopa, B., Reilly, R. G., Luksaneeyanawin, S., & Burnham, D. (2016). Child readers’ eye movements in reading Thai. Vision Research, 123, 8–19, doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.009.
Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139–1162, doi: 10.1037/rev0000248.
Liang, F. F., Blythe, H. I., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Li, X., Zang, C. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2017). The role of character positional frequency on Chinese word learning during natural reading. PLoS One, 12(11), e0187656, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187656.
Liang, F. F., Blythe, H. I., Zang, C. L., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Positional character frequency and word spacing facilitate the acquisition of novel words during Chinese children’s reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 594–608, doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.1000918.
Liang, F. F., Ma, J., Bai, X. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). Initial landing position effects on Chinese word learning in children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 116, 104183, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104183.
Liu, P. P., & Li, X. S. (2014). Inserting spaces before and after words affects word processing differently in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 57–68, doi: 10.1111/bjop.12013.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375.
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 409–421, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.409.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506, doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461.
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38(8), 1129–1144, doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00274-5.
Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 876–900, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.876.
Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. Y., Lin, Y. C., Tzeng, O. L., & Hung, D. L. (2006). Neighborhood size effects of Chinese words in lexical decision and reading. Language and Linguistics, 7(3), 659–675.
Yao, P. P., Slattery, T. J., & Li, X. S. (2021). Sentence context modulates the neighborhood frequency effect in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001030.
Yao, P. P., Staub, A., & Li, X. S. (2022). Predictability eliminates neighborhood effects during Chinese sentence reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(1), 243–252.
Yen, M. H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Tsai, J. L. (2009). Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences. Acta Psychologica, 131(1), 24–33, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.005.
Yen, M. H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Tsai, J. L. (2012). Usage of statistical cues for word boundary in reading Chinese sentences. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1007–1029, doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9321-z.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献