首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用边界范式，考察汉语阅读中读者是否在副中央凹处利用首词素的位置概率信息进行词切分和词识别。采用2（首词素位置概率：高、低）×２（预视类型：相同预视、假字预视）的被试内实验设计，以双字词为目标词，记录大学生阅读句子时的眼动轨迹。结果发现，在跳读率和第一遍阅读的眼动指标中，被试在高、低首词素位置概率条件中获得的预视效益量无显著差异。该结果表明，读者并未在副中央凹处加工首词素的位置概率信息。结合前期研究推断，首词素位置概率信息没有作用于汉语阅读的词切分和词识别。

关键词: 词素位置概率, 词切分, 副中央凹加工, 汉语阅读

Abstract: We manipulated the initial character positional probability of two-character word and preview type using boundary paradigm, in order to answer whether Chinese readers are sensitive to the information of word initial character’s positional probability during word segmentation and word identification in natural Chinese reading. Two-character words were selected as target words. The initial character’s positional probability was manipulated as being either high or low, and the final character was kept identical across the two conditions. We recorded adults’ eye movements when they read sentences containing these words. The results showed that preview benefits did not differ in the high-probability and low-probability conditions for skipping probability and the measures of first pass reading, demonstrating that Chinese readiness did not use word initial character positional probability in parafovea for word segmentation and word identification in Chinese reading.

Key words: character positional probability, word segmentation, parafoveal processing, Chinese reading

中图分类号:

B842

梁菲菲, 向颖, 龙梦灵. 首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 318-324.

LIANG Feifei, XIANG Ying, LONG Mengling. Initial Character Positional Probability Does Not Influence Word Segmentation in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Parafoveal Processing[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 318-324.

参考文献

李兴珊, 刘萍萍, 马国杰. (2011). 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评. 心理科学进展, 19(4), 459–470
王永胜, 白学军, 臧传丽, 高晓雷, 郭志英, 闫国利. (2016). 副中央凹中字N+2的预视对汉语阅读眼跳目标选择影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 48(1), 1–11
张慢慢, 臧传丽, 白学军. (2020). 中文阅读中副中央凹预加工的范围与程度. 心理科学进展, 28(6), 871–882
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 802–814.
Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1277–1287, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5(6), e10729, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729.
Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 696–713.
Johnson, N. F., & Pugh, K. R. (1994). A cohort model of visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 240–346, doi: 10.1006/cogp.1994.1008.
Kasisopa, B., Reilly, R. G., Luksaneeyanawin, S., & Burnham, D. (2013). Eye movements while reading an unspaced writing system: The case of Thai. Vision Research, 86, 71–80, doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.007.
Kasisopa, B., Reilly, R. G., Luksaneeyanawin, S., & Burnham, D. (2016). Child readers’ eye movements in reading Thai. Vision Research, 123, 8–19, doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.009.
Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139–1162, doi: 10.1037/rev0000248.
Liang, F. F., Blythe, H. I., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Li, X., Zang, C. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2017). The role of character positional frequency on Chinese word learning during natural reading. PLoS One, 12(11), e0187656, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187656.
Liang, F. F., Blythe, H. I., Zang, C. L., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Positional character frequency and word spacing facilitate the acquisition of novel words during Chinese children’s reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 594–608, doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.1000918.
Liang, F. F., Ma, J., Bai, X. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). Initial landing position effects on Chinese word learning in children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 116, 104183, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104183.
Liu, P. P., & Li, X. S. (2014). Inserting spaces before and after words affects word processing differently in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 57–68, doi: 10.1111/bjop.12013.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375.
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 409–421, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.409.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506, doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461.
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38(8), 1129–1144, doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00274-5.
Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 876–900, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.876.
Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. Y., Lin, Y. C., Tzeng, O. L., & Hung, D. L. (2006). Neighborhood size effects of Chinese words in lexical decision and reading. Language and Linguistics, 7(3), 659–675.
Yao, P. P., Slattery, T. J., & Li, X. S. (2021). Sentence context modulates the neighborhood frequency effect in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001030.
Yao, P. P., Staub, A., & Li, X. S. (2022). Predictability eliminates neighborhood effects during Chinese sentence reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(1), 243–252.
Yen, M. H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Tsai, J. L. (2009). Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences. Acta Psychologica, 131(1), 24–33, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.005.
Yen, M. H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Tsai, J. L. (2012). Usage of statistical cues for word boundary in reading Chinese sentences. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1007–1029, doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9321-z.

[1]	王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨, 白学军. 副中央凹低频双字词首字字频的预视效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 311-317.
[2]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[3]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 武浩, 韩洋. 汉语发展性阅读障碍小学生词边界划分的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 757-763.
[4]	罗雨娇, 王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨. 语境背景线索和词切分线索对留学生新词学习的作用：来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 714-720.
[5]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.
[6]	连坤予, 马杰, 魏玲, 张书帏, 白学军. 汉语朗读中词素位置概率线索作用的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 179-185.
[7]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 屈青青. 汉字位置加工的词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 193-199.
[8]	赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 721-734.
[9]	白学军, 张明哲, 孟红霞, 谭珂, 王雯. 词边界信息对发展性阅读障碍儿童朗读和默读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 594-602.
[10]	臧传丽, 鹿子佳, 白玉, 张慢慢. 阅读过程中的词跳读及其产生的认知机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 477-483.
[11]	王永胜, 陈茗静, 赵冰洁, 李馨, 白宇鸽. 副中央凹中字N+1与字N+2在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 756-765.
[12]	闫国利, 何立媛, 宋子明. 中文阅读的基本信息加工单元初探^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 120-126.
[13]	付彧,何立媛,吴蕊涵,闫国利. 不同年级学生词边界划分的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 59-64.
[14]	郭志英, 白学军, 谷莉, 王永胜, 王丽红. 词切分对日-汉和汉-日双语者日语阅读影响的眼动研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(6): 775-781.
[15]	臧传丽, 张慢慢, 岳音其, 白学军, 闫国利. 副中央凹信息量对中文朗读和默读的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(4): 444-450.