基础心理学

手机成瘾者抑制控制能力特点:来自反向眼跳任务的证据

  • 周钧毅 ,
  • 白占双
展开
  • 1. 福建师范大学体育科学学院,福州 350117
    2. 福建师范大学运动与健康福建省高校重点实验室,福州 350117
    3. 福建师范大学国家体育总局运动机能评定重点实验室,福州 350117
周钧毅,E-mail: jackychou_1225@126.com

收稿日期: 2021-11-16

  网络出版日期: 2023-03-23

基金资助

福建省自然科学基金项目(2022J05044)

版权

《心理与行为研究》编辑部, 2023, 版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。

Characteristics of Inhibitory Control Ability in Mobile Phone Addicts: The Evidence from the Antisaccade Task

  • Junyi ZHOU ,
  • Zhanshuang BAI
Expand
  • 1. School of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117
    2. Provincial University Key Laboratory of Sport and Health Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117
    3. Key Laboratory of Kinesiological Evaluation General Administration of Sport of China, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117

Received date: 2021-11-16

  Online published: 2023-03-23

Copyright

, 2023, Copyright reserved © 2023.

摘要

为深入研究手机成瘾者的抑制控制能力特点,使用手机成瘾倾向量表筛选34名被试,手机成瘾组与非手机成瘾组各17名被试完成反向眼跳范式测量。结果发现:(1)手机成瘾组反向眼跳错误率显著高于非手机成瘾组。(2)手机成瘾组朝向眼跳潜伏期显著短于非手机成瘾组。结果表明,手机成瘾组抑制控制能力显著低于非手机成瘾组,反向眼跳任务成绩较差。这表明手机成瘾者较容易受自下而上的刺激驱动,较难抑制无关刺激产生的注意干扰。

本文引用格式

周钧毅 , 白占双 . 手机成瘾者抑制控制能力特点:来自反向眼跳任务的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023 , 21(1) : 43 -48 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.01.007

Abstract

In order to investigate the characteristics of the inhibitory control ability of mobile phone addicts, 34 participants were screened by the Mobile Phone Addiction Tendency Scale. Seventeen were assigned to the mobile phone addiction group, and the rest were assigned to the non-mobile phone addiction group. All participants completed the antisaccade task. The results showed that: 1) The antisaccade error rate of the mobile phone addiction group was significantly higher than that of the non-mobile phone addiction group. 2) The prosaccade latency in the mobile phone addiction group was significantly shorter than in the non-mobile phone addiction group. The results indicate that the mobile phone addiction group has a lower inhibitory control ability than the non-mobile phone addiction group, suggesting that mobile phone addicts are easily driven by stimuli and can hardly suppress attentional interference generated by irrelevant stimuli.

参考文献

储衡清, 周晓林 注意捕获与自上而下的加工过程. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12 (5): 680- 687.
  李垚锦, 张微, 扶蓓, 周兵平 成人注意缺陷多动障碍在内外源冲突时的表现: 眼动的证据. 心理学报, 2020, 52 (6): 777- 785.
  刘勤学, 张聚媛, 林悦 大学生智能手机成瘾与抑制控制能力的关系: 手机位置和认知负荷的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37 (2): 257- 265.
  任玉嘉, 李梦龙, 吉彬彬, 蒋芬 青少年手机成瘾与冲动性相关性的meta分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2021, 35 (3): 200- 207.
  汪海彬, 陶炎坤, 徐宏图 不同手机依赖程度大学生的抑制控制特点. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2015, 29 (3): 226- 229.
  王君, 陈天勇 抑制控制与高级认知功能的关系. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20 (11): 1768- 1778.
  熊婕, 周宗奎, 陈武, 游志麒, 翟紫艳 大学生手机成瘾倾向量表的编制. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26 (3): 222- 225.
  宣宾, 彭苏浩 手动与眼动反应抑制的认知神经机制. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 2015, 42 (4): 329- 336.
  袁加锦, 徐萌萌, 杨洁敏, 李红 双选择Oddball范式在行为抑制控制研究中的应用. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2017, 47 (10): 1065- 1073.
  袁明, 郝伟, 李勇辉. (2018). 房间里的大象: 有关行为成瘾的争议及回应. 中国药物滥用防治杂志, 24(5), 249–255, 259.
  张阔, 何立媛, 赵莹, 王敬欣 奖励和惩罚在注意控制过程中的优化和分离: 眼动研究. 心理学报, 2019, 51 (11): 1207- 1219.
  祖静, 封孟君, 郝爽, 但菲 手机依赖大学生抑制控制特点及与渴求感的关系. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41 (2): 247- 249.
  Adleman, N. E., Menon, V., Blasey, C. M., White, C. D., Warsofsky, I. S., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L. A developmental fMRI study of the Stroop color-word task. NeuroImage, 2002, 16 (1): 61- 75.
  Aichert, D. S., W?stmann, N. M., Costa, A., Macare, C., Wenig, J. R., M?ller, H., … Ettinger, U. Associations between trait impulsivity and prepotent response inhibition. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2012, 34 (10): 1016- 1032.
  Bull, R., & Scerif, G. Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2001, 19 (3): 273- 293.
  Chen, J. W., Liang, Y. S., Mai, C., Zhong, X. Y., & Qu, C. General deficit in inhibitory control of excessive smartphone users: Evidence from an event-related potential study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, 7, 511.
  Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2005). Reflective and impulsive determinants of addictive behavior. In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 45–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  Diamond, A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 2013, 64, 135- 168.
  Dias, N. R., Schmitz, J. M., Rathnayaka, N., Red, S. D., Sereno, A. B., Moeller, F. G., & Lane, S. D. Anti-saccade error rates as a measure of attentional bias in cocaine dependent subjects. Behavioural Brain Research, 2015, 292, 493- 499.
  Dong, G. H., Lu, Q. L., Zhou, H., & Zhao, X. Impulse inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder: Electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Neuroscience Letters, 2010, 485 (2): 138- 142.
  Dyckman, K. A., & McDowell, J. E. Behavioral plasticity of antisaccade performance following daily practice. Experimental Brain Research, 2005, 162 (1): 63- 69.
  Ettinger, U., Ffytche, D. H., Kumari, V., Kathmann, N., Reuter, B., Zelaya, F., & Williams, S. C. R. Decomposing the neural correlates of antisaccade eye movements using event-related fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 2008, 18 (5): 1148- 1159.
  Hallett, P. E. Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 1978, 18 (10): 1279- 1296.
  Hu, Y. X., Guo, J. H., Jou, M., Zhou, S. Q., Wang, D. W., Maguire, P., … Qu, F. Z. Investigating the attentional bias and information processing mechanism of mobile phone addicts towards emotional information. Computers in Human Behavior, 2020, 110, 106378.
  Jones, A., Cole, J., Goudie, A., & Field, M. Priming a restrained mental set reduces alcohol-seeking independently of mood. Psychopharmacology, 2011, 218 (3): 557- 565.
  Kim, M., Lee, T. H., Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. B., Hwang, W. J., Kim, T., … Kwon, J. S. Dysfunctional attentional bias and inhibitory control during anti-saccade task in patients with internet gaming disorder: An eye tracking study. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 2019, 95, 109717.
  Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students. SAGE Open, 2015, 5 (1)
  Li, J., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. E. Locus of control and cell phone use: Implications for sleep quality, academic performance, and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 52, 450- 457.
  Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 1984, 91 (3): 295- 327.
  Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological Science, 1997, 8 (1): 60- 64.
  Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2004, 5 (3): 218- 228.
  Myles, O., Grafton, B., & MacLeod, C. Anxiety & inhibition: Dissociating the involvement of state and trait anxiety in inhibitory control deficits observed on the anti-saccade task. Cognition and Emotion, 2020, 34 (8): 1746- 1752.
  Olk, B., & Kingstone, A. Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm. NeuroReport, 2003, 14 (1): 151- 155.
  Pike, E., Stoops, W. W., Fillmore, M. T., & Rush, C. R. Drug-related stimuli impair inhibitory control in cocaine abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2013, 133 (2): 768- 771.
  Samani, A., & Heath, M. Executive-related oculomotor control is improved following a 10-min single-bout of aerobic exercise: Evidence from the antisaccade task. Neuropsychologia, 2018, 108, 73- 81.
  Stacy, A. W., & Wiers, R. W. Implicit cognition and addiction: A tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2010, 6, 551- 575.
  Thush, C., Wiers, R. W., Ames, S. L., Grenard, J. L., Sussman, S., & Stacy, A. W. Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2008, 94 (1–3): 116- 124.
  Young, K. S. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1998, 1 (3): 237- 244.
文章导航

/


版权所有 © 《心理与行为研究》编辑部
地址:天津市西青区宾水西道393号,天津师范大学106#邮箱 邮编:300387
电话:022-23540231, 23541213 E-mail:psybeh@126.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发