手机成瘾者抑制控制能力特点：来自反向眼跳任务的证据

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.01.007

心理与行为研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 43-48.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.01.007

手机成瘾者抑制控制能力特点：来自反向眼跳任务的证据

周钧毅¹^,²^,³^,*(), 白占双¹

1. 福建师范大学体育科学学院，福州 350117
2. 福建师范大学运动与健康福建省高校重点实验室，福州 350117
3. 福建师范大学国家体育总局运动机能评定重点实验室，福州 350117

收稿日期:2021-11-16 出版日期:2023-01-20 发布日期:2023-01-20
通讯作者: 周钧毅
基金资助:
福建省自然科学基金项目(2022J05044)

Characteristics of Inhibitory Control Ability in Mobile Phone Addicts: The Evidence from the Antisaccade Task

Junyi ZHOU¹^,²^,³^,*(), Zhanshuang BAI¹

1. School of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117
2. Provincial University Key Laboratory of Sport and Health Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117
3. Key Laboratory of Kinesiological Evaluation General Administration of Sport of China, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117

Received:2021-11-16 Online:2023-01-20 Published:2023-01-20
Contact: Junyi ZHOU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为深入研究手机成瘾者的抑制控制能力特点，使用手机成瘾倾向量表筛选34名被试，手机成瘾组与非手机成瘾组各17名被试完成反向眼跳范式测量。结果发现：(1)手机成瘾组反向眼跳错误率显著高于非手机成瘾组。(2)手机成瘾组朝向眼跳潜伏期显著短于非手机成瘾组。结果表明，手机成瘾组抑制控制能力显著低于非手机成瘾组，反向眼跳任务成绩较差。这表明手机成瘾者较容易受自下而上的刺激驱动，较难抑制无关刺激产生的注意干扰。

关键词: 手机成瘾, 反向眼跳范式, 抑制控制能力

Abstract:

In order to investigate the characteristics of the inhibitory control ability of mobile phone addicts, 34 participants were screened by the Mobile Phone Addiction Tendency Scale. Seventeen were assigned to the mobile phone addiction group, and the rest were assigned to the non-mobile phone addiction group. All participants completed the antisaccade task. The results showed that: 1) The antisaccade error rate of the mobile phone addiction group was significantly higher than that of the non-mobile phone addiction group. 2) The prosaccade latency in the mobile phone addiction group was significantly shorter than in the non-mobile phone addiction group. The results indicate that the mobile phone addiction group has a lower inhibitory control ability than the non-mobile phone addiction group, suggesting that mobile phone addicts are easily driven by stimuli and can hardly suppress attentional interference generated by irrelevant stimuli.

Key words: mobile phone addiction, antisaccade paradigm, inhibitory control ability

中图分类号:

B842

周钧毅, 白占双. 手机成瘾者抑制控制能力特点：来自反向眼跳任务的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 43-48.

Junyi ZHOU, Zhanshuang BAI. Characteristics of Inhibitory Control Ability in Mobile Phone Addicts: The Evidence from the Antisaccade Task[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(1): 43-48.

图/表 2

参考文献

	储衡清, 周晓林注意捕获与自上而下的加工过程. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12 (5): 680- 687. DOI
	李垚锦, 张微, 扶蓓, 周兵平成人注意缺陷多动障碍在内外源冲突时的表现: 眼动的证据. 心理学报, 2020, 52 (6): 777- 785.
	刘勤学, 张聚媛, 林悦大学生智能手机成瘾与抑制控制能力的关系: 手机位置和认知负荷的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37 (2): 257- 265.
	任玉嘉, 李梦龙, 吉彬彬, 蒋芬青少年手机成瘾与冲动性相关性的meta分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2021, 35 (3): 200- 207. DOI
	汪海彬, 陶炎坤, 徐宏图不同手机依赖程度大学生的抑制控制特点. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2015, 29 (3): 226- 229. DOI
	王君, 陈天勇抑制控制与高级认知功能的关系. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20 (11): 1768- 1778.
	熊婕, 周宗奎, 陈武, 游志麒, 翟紫艳大学生手机成瘾倾向量表的编制. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26 (3): 222- 225. DOI
	宣宾, 彭苏浩手动与眼动反应抑制的认知神经机制. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 2015, 42 (4): 329- 336.
	袁加锦, 徐萌萌, 杨洁敏, 李红双选择Oddball范式在行为抑制控制研究中的应用. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2017, 47 (10): 1065- 1073.
	袁明, 郝伟, 李勇辉. (2018). 房间里的大象: 有关行为成瘾的争议及回应. 中国药物滥用防治杂志, 24(5), 249–255, 259.
	张阔, 何立媛, 赵莹, 王敬欣奖励和惩罚在注意控制过程中的优化和分离: 眼动研究. 心理学报, 2019, 51 (11): 1207- 1219.
	祖静, 封孟君, 郝爽, 但菲手机依赖大学生抑制控制特点及与渴求感的关系. 中国学校卫生, 2020, 41 (2): 247- 249.
	Adleman, N. E., Menon, V., Blasey, C. M., White, C. D., Warsofsky, I. S., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L. A developmental fMRI study of the Stroop color-word task. NeuroImage, 2002, 16 (1): 61- 75. DOI
	Aichert, D. S., Wöstmann, N. M., Costa, A., Macare, C., Wenig, J. R., Möller, H., … Ettinger, U. Associations between trait impulsivity and prepotent response inhibition. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2012, 34 (10): 1016- 1032. DOI
	Bull, R., & Scerif, G. Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2001, 19 (3): 273- 293. DOI
	Chen, J. W., Liang, Y. S., Mai, C., Zhong, X. Y., & Qu, C. General deficit in inhibitory control of excessive smartphone users: Evidence from an event-related potential study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, 7, 511. DOI
	Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2005). Reflective and impulsive determinants of addictive behavior. In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 45–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
	Diamond, A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 2013, 64, 135- 168. DOI
	Dias, N. R., Schmitz, J. M., Rathnayaka, N., Red, S. D., Sereno, A. B., Moeller, F. G., & Lane, S. D. Anti-saccade error rates as a measure of attentional bias in cocaine dependent subjects. Behavioural Brain Research, 2015, 292, 493- 499. DOI
	Dong, G. H., Lu, Q. L., Zhou, H., & Zhao, X. Impulse inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder: Electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Neuroscience Letters, 2010, 485 (2): 138- 142. DOI
	Dyckman, K. A., & McDowell, J. E. Behavioral plasticity of antisaccade performance following daily practice. Experimental Brain Research, 2005, 162 (1): 63- 69. DOI
	Ettinger, U., Ffytche, D. H., Kumari, V., Kathmann, N., Reuter, B., Zelaya, F., & Williams, S. C. R. Decomposing the neural correlates of antisaccade eye movements using event-related fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 2008, 18 (5): 1148- 1159. DOI
	Hallett, P. E. Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 1978, 18 (10): 1279- 1296. DOI
	Hu, Y. X., Guo, J. H., Jou, M., Zhou, S. Q., Wang, D. W., Maguire, P., … Qu, F. Z. Investigating the attentional bias and information processing mechanism of mobile phone addicts towards emotional information. Computers in Human Behavior, 2020, 110, 106378. DOI
	Jones, A., Cole, J., Goudie, A., & Field, M. Priming a restrained mental set reduces alcohol-seeking independently of mood. Psychopharmacology, 2011, 218 (3): 557- 565. DOI
	Kim, M., Lee, T. H., Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. B., Hwang, W. J., Kim, T., … Kwon, J. S. Dysfunctional attentional bias and inhibitory control during anti-saccade task in patients with internet gaming disorder: An eye tracking study. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 2019, 95, 109717. DOI
	Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students. SAGE Open, 2015, 5 (1) DOI
	Li, J., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. E. Locus of control and cell phone use: Implications for sleep quality, academic performance, and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 52, 450- 457. DOI
	Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 1984, 91 (3): 295- 327. DOI
	Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological Science, 1997, 8 (1): 60- 64. DOI
	Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2004, 5 (3): 218- 228. DOI
	Myles, O., Grafton, B., & MacLeod, C. Anxiety & inhibition: Dissociating the involvement of state and trait anxiety in inhibitory control deficits observed on the anti-saccade task. Cognition and Emotion, 2020, 34 (8): 1746- 1752. DOI
	Olk, B., & Kingstone, A. Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm. NeuroReport, 2003, 14 (1): 151- 155. DOI
	Pike, E., Stoops, W. W., Fillmore, M. T., & Rush, C. R. Drug-related stimuli impair inhibitory control in cocaine abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2013, 133 (2): 768- 771. DOI
	Samani, A., & Heath, M. Executive-related oculomotor control is improved following a 10-min single-bout of aerobic exercise: Evidence from the antisaccade task. Neuropsychologia, 2018, 108, 73- 81. DOI
	Stacy, A. W., & Wiers, R. W. Implicit cognition and addiction: A tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2010, 6, 551- 575. DOI
	Thush, C., Wiers, R. W., Ames, S. L., Grenard, J. L., Sussman, S., & Stacy, A. W. Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2008, 94 (1–3): 116- 124. DOI
	Young, K. S. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1998, 1 (3): 237- 244. DOI

组别	错误率(%)		潜伏期(ms)		反向眼跳成本
组别	反向眼跳	朝向眼跳	反向眼跳	朝向眼跳	反向眼跳成本
手机成瘾组 (n=17)	14.07±11.30	0.17±0.49	225±30	159±21	66.38±28.93
非手机成瘾组 (n =17)	5.82±7.75	0.25±0.78	230±31	177±23	52.94±27.74

组别	错误率(%)		潜伏期(ms)		反向眼跳成本
组别	反向眼跳	朝向眼跳	反向眼跳	朝向眼跳	反向眼跳成本
手机成瘾组 (n=17)	14.07±11.30	0.17±0.49	225±30	159±21	66.38±28.93
非手机成瘾组 (n =17)	5.82±7.75	0.25±0.78	230±31	177±23	52.94±27.74

[1]	熊思成, 张斌, 姜永志, 蒋怀滨, 陈芸. 手机成瘾流行率及其影响因素的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 802-808.
[2]	郭庆童, 徐铭雪, 许春艳, 刘秀丽. 大学生宿舍人际关系困扰与手机成瘾的关系：序列中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 650-656.
[3]	马榕梓, 蒙浩然, 阎丽丽, 陈妤, 曹洪健, 周楠, 邓林园, 张锦涛. 手机相关的父母教养行为与青少年手机成瘾：一项全国性调查[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 265-272.
[4]	黄明明, 赵守盈. 述情障碍对大学生手机成瘾倾向的影响：孤独感与正念的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 686-692.
[5]	张秀阁, 秦婕, 黄文玉. 大学生生命意义感与手机成瘾倾向的关系：自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 536-545.
[6]	刘海娟,姚德雯. 大学生手机成瘾与孤独感和自我和谐的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 406-410.

手机成瘾者抑制控制能力特点：来自反向眼跳任务的证据

Characteristics of Inhibitory Control Ability in Mobile Phone Addicts: The Evidence from the Antisaccade Task

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价