基础心理学

基于公共物品博弈框架的排斥行为范式开发

  • 黄骏青 ,
  • 李楷政 ,
  • 张姝玥
展开
  • 1. 广西师范大学教育学部,桂林 541006
    2. 广西师范大学认知神经科学与应用心理广西高校重点实验室,桂林 541006
张姝玥,E-mail: shuyuezh@126.com

收稿日期: 2022-08-29

  网络出版日期: 2023-07-14

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(32060197);广西自然科学基金项目(2019JJB130190)

版权

《心理与行为研究》编辑部, 2023, 版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。

Development of Ostracism Paradigm Under the Frame of Public Good Game

  • Junqing HUANG ,
  • Kaizheng LI ,
  • Shuyue ZHANG
Expand
  • 1. Faculty of Education, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006
    2. Guangxi University and College Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006

Received date: 2022-08-29

  Online published: 2023-07-14

Copyright

, 2023, Copyright reserved © 2023.

摘要

已有的排斥者研究范式通常存在诱发效率不高的缺点。本研究结合公共物品博弈框架(PGG),开发了一个能够高效地引发排斥行为的实验范式,并用两个实验对该范式的有效性进行了检验。结果发现,被试对损害团体利益的成员均表现出高度的排斥行为:实验1中实验组被试的排斥诱发率显著高于对照组;实验2增加匿名/公开情境,发现实验组中,匿名条件下被试的排斥行为显著多于公开条件。结果表明,该范式能够稳定有效地诱发排斥行为,是排斥者研究的新方法。

本文引用格式

黄骏青 , 李楷政 , 张姝玥 . 基于公共物品博弈框架的排斥行为范式开发[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023 , 21(3) : 320 -327 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.03.005

Abstract

Social exclusion has two dimensions. One is the target of the exclusion (i.e., the victim) and the other is the source of exclusion (i.e., the rejecter). However, existing paradigms focusing on rejecters have exhibited a limitation in their ability to consistently elicit exclusionary behavior. To address this gap, the present study integrated social exclusion within the framework of the Public Good Game (PGG) and devised a novel paradigm for rejecters. This new paradigm demonstrated a significantly higher success rate in inducing exclusionary behavior. Furthermore, we used two experiments to test it. The result of Experiment 1 showed that participants of the experiment group had a significantly higher rate to do the exclusion behavior than the control group. To simulate real-life social exclusion contexts, Experiment 2 introduced an “anonymous” factor. The results revealed that participants of the experiment group exhibited a significantly higher rate of engaging in social exclusion behavior under the anonymous condition compared to the public condition. The newly developed paradigm in this study proves to be highly effective in eliciting social exclusion behavior, providing a fresh approach to examining social exclusion from the perspective of the rejecter.

参考文献

海晶晶, 黄凯南. (2017). 公共物品实验中榜样式领导机制研究进展. 经济问题, (11), 90–94, 124.
  邵蕾, 张登浩. 社会排斥后的行为反应: 基于一般攻击模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29 (6): 1163- 1171.
  Bastian, B., Jetten, J., Chen, H., Radke, H. R. M., Harding, J. F., & Fasoli, F.. Losing our humanity: The self-dehumanizing consequences of social ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2013, 39 (2): 156- 169.
  Chen, D. L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C.. oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2016, 9, 88- 97.
  Cinyabuguma, M., Page, T., & Putterman, L.. Can second-order punishment deter perverse punishment?. Experimental Economics, 2006, 9 (3): 265- 279.
  Fang, Y. H., Benko, T. P., Perc, M., Xu, H., & Tan, Q. M. (2019). Synergistic third-party rewarding and punishment in the public goods game. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 475(2227), 20190349.
  Fung, K., & Alden, L. E.. Once hurt, twice shy: Social pain contributes to social anxiety. Emotion, 2017, 17 (2): 231- 239.
  Gooley, S. L., Zadro, L., Williams, L. A., Svetieva, E., & Gonsalkorale, K.. Ostracizing for a reason: A novel source paradigm for examining the nature and consequences of motivated ostracism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, 155 (5): 410- 431.
  Grahe, J. E.. Commentary on sources of ostracism research. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, 155 (5): 403- 409.
  Kerr, N. L., & Levine, J. M.. The detection of social exclusion: Evolution and beyond. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 2008, 12 (1): 39- 52.
  Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S.. Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 80 (6): 918- 930.
  Poulsen, J. R., & Kashy, D. A.. Two sides of the ostracism coin: How sources and targets of social exclusion perceive themselves and one another. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2012, 15 (4): 457- 470.
  Reinhard, M. A., Dewald-Kaufmann, J., Wüstenberg, T., Musil, R., Barton, B. B., Jobst, A., & Padberg, F.. The vicious circle of social exclusion and psychopathology: A systematic review of experimental ostracism research in psychiatric disorders. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2020, 270 (5): 521- 532.
  Rondeau, D., Poe, G. L., & Schulze, W. D.. VCM or PPM? A comparison of the performance of two voluntary public goods mechanisms. Journal of Public Economics, 2005, 89 (8): 1581- 1592.
  Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S.. If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81 (6): 1058- 1069.
  Wesselmann, E D., Williams, K. D., & Wirth, J. H. Ostracizing group members who can (or cannot) control being burdensome. Human Ethology Bulletin, 2014, 29, 82- 103.
  Wesselmann, E. D., Wirth, J. H., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Williams, K. D.. When do we ostracize?. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2013, 4 (1): 108- 115.
  Williams, K. D. (1997). Social ostracism. In R. M. Kowalski (Ed.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 133–170). New York: Plenum.
  Williams, K. D.. Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 2007, 58, 425- 452.
  Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 279–314). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K., & Choi, W.. Cyber Ostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79 (5): 748.
  Williams, K. D., Shore, W. J., & Grahe, J. E.. The silent treatment: Perceptions of its behaviors and associated feelings. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1998, 1 (2): 117- 141.
  Wirth, J. H., Bernstein, M. J., & LeRoy, A. S.. Atimia: A new paradigm for investigating how individuals feel when ostracizing others. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, 155 (5): 497- 514.
  Wirth, J. H., Bernstein, M. J., Wesselmann, E. D., & LeRoy, A. S.. Social cues establish expectations of rejection and affect the response to being rejected. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2017, 20 (1): 32- 51.
  Wyer, N. A., & Schenke, K. C.. Just you and I: The role of social exclusion in the formation of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2016, 65, 20- 25.
  Zadro, L., & Gonsalkorale, K.. Sources of ostracism: The nature and consequences of excluding and ignoring others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2014, 23 (2): 93- 97.
文章导航

/


版权所有 © 《心理与行为研究》编辑部
地址:天津市西青区宾水西道393号,天津师范大学106#邮箱 邮编:300387
电话:022-23540231, 23541213 E-mail:psybeh@126.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发