基于公共物品博弈框架的排斥行为范式开发

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.03.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

已有的排斥者研究范式通常存在诱发效率不高的缺点。本研究结合公共物品博弈框架(PGG)，开发了一个能够高效地引发排斥行为的实验范式，并用两个实验对该范式的有效性进行了检验。结果发现，被试对损害团体利益的成员均表现出高度的排斥行为：实验1中实验组被试的排斥诱发率显著高于对照组；实验2增加匿名/公开情境，发现实验组中，匿名条件下被试的排斥行为显著多于公开条件。结果表明，该范式能够稳定有效地诱发排斥行为，是排斥者研究的新方法。

关键词: 社会排斥, 排斥动机, 公共物品博弈, 排斥者

Abstract:

Social exclusion has two dimensions. One is the target of the exclusion (i.e., the victim) and the other is the source of exclusion (i.e., the rejecter). However, existing paradigms focusing on rejecters have exhibited a limitation in their ability to consistently elicit exclusionary behavior. To address this gap, the present study integrated social exclusion within the framework of the Public Good Game (PGG) and devised a novel paradigm for rejecters. This new paradigm demonstrated a significantly higher success rate in inducing exclusionary behavior. Furthermore, we used two experiments to test it. The result of Experiment 1 showed that participants of the experiment group had a significantly higher rate to do the exclusion behavior than the control group. To simulate real-life social exclusion contexts, Experiment 2 introduced an “anonymous” factor. The results revealed that participants of the experiment group exhibited a significantly higher rate of engaging in social exclusion behavior under the anonymous condition compared to the public condition. The newly developed paradigm in this study proves to be highly effective in eliciting social exclusion behavior, providing a fresh approach to examining social exclusion from the perspective of the rejecter.

Key words: social exclusion, motivation of social exclusion, Public Goods Game, rejecter

中图分类号:

B842

黄骏青, 李楷政, 张姝玥. 基于公共物品博弈框架的排斥行为范式开发[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 320-327.

Junqing HUANG, Kaizheng LI, Shuyue ZHANG. Development of Ostracism Paradigm Under the Frame of Public Good Game[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(3): 320-327.

图/表 12

参考文献

	海晶晶, 黄凯南. (2017). 公共物品实验中榜样式领导机制研究进展. 经济问题, (11), 90–94, 124.
	邵蕾, 张登浩. 社会排斥后的行为反应: 基于一般攻击模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29 (6): 1163- 1171.
	Bastian, B., Jetten, J., Chen, H., Radke, H. R. M., Harding, J. F., & Fasoli, F.. Losing our humanity: The self-dehumanizing consequences of social ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2013, 39 (2): 156- 169. DOI
	Chen, D. L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C.. oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2016, 9, 88- 97. DOI
	Cinyabuguma, M., Page, T., & Putterman, L.. Can second-order punishment deter perverse punishment?. Experimental Economics, 2006, 9 (3): 265- 279. DOI
	Fang, Y. H., Benko, T. P., Perc, M., Xu, H., & Tan, Q. M. (2019). Synergistic third-party rewarding and punishment in the public goods game. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 475(2227), 20190349.
	Fung, K., & Alden, L. E.. Once hurt, twice shy: Social pain contributes to social anxiety. Emotion, 2017, 17 (2): 231- 239. DOI
	Gooley, S. L., Zadro, L., Williams, L. A., Svetieva, E., & Gonsalkorale, K.. Ostracizing for a reason: A novel source paradigm for examining the nature and consequences of motivated ostracism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, 155 (5): 410- 431. DOI
	Grahe, J. E.. Commentary on sources of ostracism research. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, 155 (5): 403- 409. DOI
	Kerr, N. L., & Levine, J. M.. The detection of social exclusion: Evolution and beyond. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 2008, 12 (1): 39- 52. DOI
	Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S.. Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 80 (6): 918- 930. DOI
	Poulsen, J. R., & Kashy, D. A.. Two sides of the ostracism coin: How sources and targets of social exclusion perceive themselves and one another. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2012, 15 (4): 457- 470.
	Reinhard, M. A., Dewald-Kaufmann, J., Wüstenberg, T., Musil, R., Barton, B. B., Jobst, A., & Padberg, F.. The vicious circle of social exclusion and psychopathology: A systematic review of experimental ostracism research in psychiatric disorders. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2020, 270 (5): 521- 532. DOI
	Rondeau, D., Poe, G. L., & Schulze, W. D.. VCM or PPM? A comparison of the performance of two voluntary public goods mechanisms. Journal of Public Economics, 2005, 89 (8): 1581- 1592. DOI
	Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S.. If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81 (6): 1058- 1069. DOI
	Wesselmann, E D., Williams, K. D., & Wirth, J. H. Ostracizing group members who can (or cannot) control being burdensome. Human Ethology Bulletin, 2014, 29, 82- 103.
	Wesselmann, E. D., Wirth, J. H., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Williams, K. D.. When do we ostracize?. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2013, 4 (1): 108- 115. DOI
	Williams, K. D. (1997). Social ostracism. In R. M. Kowalski (Ed.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 133–170). New York: Plenum.
	Williams, K. D.. Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 2007, 58, 425- 452. DOI
	Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 279–314). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
	Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K., & Choi, W.. Cyber Ostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79 (5): 748. DOI
	Williams, K. D., Shore, W. J., & Grahe, J. E.. The silent treatment: Perceptions of its behaviors and associated feelings. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1998, 1 (2): 117- 141.
	Wirth, J. H., Bernstein, M. J., & LeRoy, A. S.. Atimia: A new paradigm for investigating how individuals feel when ostracizing others. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, 155 (5): 497- 514. DOI
	Wirth, J. H., Bernstein, M. J., Wesselmann, E. D., & LeRoy, A. S.. Social cues establish expectations of rejection and affect the response to being rejected. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2017, 20 (1): 32- 51.
	Wyer, N. A., & Schenke, K. C.. Just you and I: The role of social exclusion in the formation of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2016, 65, 20- 25. DOI
	Zadro, L., & Gonsalkorale, K.. Sources of ostracism: The nature and consequences of excluding and ignoring others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2014, 23 (2): 93- 97. DOI

	对照组(n=92)		实验组(n=92)
	得票数	占比(%)	得票数	占比(%)
玩家A	17	18.48	4	4.35
玩家B	15	16.30	71	77.17
玩家D	9	9.78	4	4.35
弃权	51	55.44	13	14.13

	对照组(n=92)		实验组(n=92)
	得票数	占比(%)	得票数	占比(%)
玩家A	17	18.48	4	4.35
玩家B	15	16.30	71	77.17
玩家D	9	9.78	4	4.35
弃权	51	55.44	13	14.13

	对照组(n=92)		实验组(n=92)
	M	SD	M	SD
玩家A	2.07	1.09	1.75	1.05
玩家B	2.17	1.26	3.69	1.32
玩家D	2.07	1.31	1.65	0.89

	对照组(n=92)		实验组(n=92)
	M	SD	M	SD
玩家A	2.07	1.09	1.75	1.05
玩家B	2.17	1.26	3.69	1.32
玩家D	2.07	1.31	1.65	0.89

	对照组(n=92)		实验组(n=92)
	M	SD	M	SD
玩家A	3.67	0.93	4.02	0.99
玩家B	3.68	1.10	2.15	1.10
玩家D	3.64	0.90	3.98	1.01