汉语“N的V”结构加工的韵律制约

于秒; 王文娣; 陈晓霄

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.004

心理与行为研究 >

2023 , Vol. 21 >Issue 6: 744 - 750

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.004

基础心理学

汉语“N的V”结构加工的韵律制约

于秒 ,
王文娣 ,
陈晓霄

展开

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300387
2. 天津师范大学心理学部，天津 300387
3. 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387

王文娣，E-mail：wangwendi219@163.com
陈晓霄，E-mail：josiecxx@163.com

收稿日期: 2023-01-06

网络出版日期: 2024-01-24

基金资助

2022年国际中文教育课题一般项目(22YH67C)

版权

收起

Prosodic Constraints in Chinese “N de V” Construction

Miao YU ,
Wendi WANG ,
Xiaoxiao CHEN

Expand

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387
2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387
3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387

Received date: 2023-01-06

Online published: 2024-01-24

Copyright

Fold

摘要

已有研究表明内隐韵律能够促进书面文本的理解，但以往研究多集中在重音节拍语言，而较少关注汉语这类音节节拍语言。为了探究内隐韵律作用的普遍性，研究采用眼动技术探讨了句子阅读中“N的V”结构加工的韵律制约。研究发现，“N的V”结构加工中存在稳定的韵律形式效应：动词为单音节时比动词为双音节时的注视时间更长，回视更多。韵律形式和语义关系之间存在交互作用，表现在受事语义关系条件下，在反映早期加工的凝视时间上，单音节动词条件长于双音节动词条件。但这种交互作用在晚期加工阶段则不受语义关系影响。表明“N的V”结构加工中的韵律形式效应稳定且持续。研究支持内隐韵律假说。

关键词： 内隐韵律; 语义关系; “N的V”结构; 默读; 眼动

本文引用格式

于秒 , 王文娣 , 陈晓霄 . 汉语“N的V”结构加工的韵律制约[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023 , 21(6) : 744 -750 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.004

Abstract

Evidence suggests that implicit prosody can facilitate the processing of written texts. Although there is considerable research on stress-timed languages, the role of implicit prosody in syllable-timed languages has not received much attention. The current study explored the cross-linguistic universality of implicit prosody in the “N de V” construction. The results revealed an interaction between prosodic patterns and semantic relations. At an early stage of processing, there was a preference for disyllabic verbs when there was a “patient-verb” semantic relationship. The findings demonstrate the immediate availability of prosodic information in Chinese sentence processing. Importantly, a stable and continuous effect of prosody was found such that monosyllabic verbs had longer fixation duration than disyllabic verbs and more regressions were made to prosodic patterns containing monosyllabic verbs. The conclusion supports the Implicit Prosody Hypothesis.

Key words： implicit prosody; semantic relations; “N de V” construction; silent reading; eye movement

参考文献

	方绪军, 李翠. “N的V_单”的构成及其语篇使用情况考察. 汉语学习, 2017, (2): 34- 41.
	王丽娟. 汉语两类[N的V]结构的韵律句法考察. 世界汉语教学, 2014, 28 (1): 70- 77.
	闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21 (4): 589- 605.
	詹卫东. 关于“NP+的+VP”偏正结构. 汉语学习, 1998, (2): 24- 28.
	Ashby, J., & Clifton, C., Jr.. The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading. Cognition, 2005, 96 (3): B89- B100.
	Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 2008, 59 (4): 390- 412.
	Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 2013, 68 (3): 255- 278.
	Bates, D., M?chler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 2015, 67 (1): 1- 48.
	Breen, M.. Empirical investigations of the role of implicit prosody in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2014, 8 (2): 37- 50.
	Breen, M., & Clifton, C., Jr.. Stress matters: Effects of anticipated lexical stress on silent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 2011, 64 (2): 153- 170.
	Breen, M., & Clifton, C., Jr.. Stress matters revisited: A boundary change experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2013, 66 (10): 1896- 1909.
	Brothers, T., & Traxler, M. J. (2016). Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(12), 1894–1906.
	Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M.. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 2010, 5 (6): e10729.
	Cohen, J.. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65 (3): 145- 153.
	Dong, Y. (2015). The prosody and morphology of elastic words in Chinese: Annotations and analyses (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
	Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A.. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2008, 61 (8): 1239- 1249.
	Fodor, J. D.. Learning to parse. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1998, 27 (2): 285- 319.
	Fodor, J. D. (2002). Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. In M. Hirotani (Ed.), Proceedings of the North East linguistics society (Vol. 32, pp. 112–132). Amherst, MA: GSLA.
	Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D.. Phonological working memory: A critical building block for reading development and vocabulary acquisition. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1993, 8 (3): 259- 272.
	Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
	Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 417–429.
	Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K.. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 1986, 40 (6): 431- 439.
	Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 68–81.
	Kentner, G.. Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension. Cognition, 2012, 123 (1): 1- 20.
	Kentner, G., & Vasishth, S.. Prosodic focus marking in silent reading: Effects of discourse context and rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, 7, 319.
	Lee, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, X. M.. Do metrical incongruities disrupt semantic processing in modern Chinese? An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 2015, 26 (14): 803- 808.
	Long, J. X., Wang, T. L., & Yu, M.. Sentential position of V—N combination modulates the rhythmic pattern effect during Chinese sentence reading: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica, 2022, 228, 103641.
	Luo, Y. Y., Duan, Y. Y., & Zhou, X. L.. Processing rhythmic pattern during Chinese sentence reading: An eye movement study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, 6, 1881.
	Luo, Y. Y., & Zhou, X. L.. ERP evidence for the online processing of rhythmic pattern during Chinese sentence reading. NeuroImage, 2010, 49 (3): 2836- 2849.
	Pollatsek, A., Juhasz, B. J., Reichle, E. D., Machacek, D., & Rayner, K.. Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: A reversed delayed effect of word length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2008, 34 (3): 726- 750.
	R Core Team. (2020). R:A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
	Rayner, K.. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, 124 (3): 372- 422.
	Rayner, K.. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009, 62 (8): 1457- 1506.
	Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E.. Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1996, 22 (5): 1188- 1200.
	Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
	Rothermich, K., & Kotz, S. A.. Predictions in speech comprehension: fMRI evidence on the meter-semantic interface. NeuroImage, 2013, 70, 89- 100.
	Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5–35.
	Slowiaczek, M. L., & Clifton, C.. Subvocalization and reading for meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980, 19 (5): 573- 582.
	Staub, A.. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition, 2010, 116 (1): 71- 86.
	Warren, P., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F.. Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1995, 10 (5): 457- 486.
	Webman-Shafran, R. & Fodor, J. D.. Phrase length and prosody in on-line ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2016, 45 (3): 447- 474.
	Westfall, J. (2016). PANGEA: Power analysis for general anova designs. Retrieved January 12, 2023 from https://jakewestfall.shinyapps.io/pangea/
	Zang, C. L., Fu, Y., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P.. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2018, 44 (12): 1831- 1841.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献