Chen Baoguo,Zhou Huixia. THE INFLUENCE OF THE RELATED DEGREE OF POLYSEMOUS WORD′S MEANINGS ON THE LEXICAL DECISION TIMES[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2005, 3(3): 214-218.
[1] Rubenstein H, Garfield L, Millikan J A. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9: 487~494 [2] Hino Y, Lupker S. Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1996, 22(6): 1331~1356 [3] Pexman P M, Lupker S J. Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effect? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1999, 53(4): 323~334 [4] Borowsky R, Masson M E. Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996, 22(1): 63~85 [5] Gernsbacher M A. Revolving 20 years of inconsistent interaction between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1984, 113(2): 256~281 [6] Azuma T, Van Orden G C. Why safe is better than fast: The relatedness of a word′s meaning affects lexical decision times. Journal of Memory and Language, 1997, 36: 484~504 [7] 陈宝国, 彭聃龄. 汉语双字多义词的识别优势效应. 心理学报, 2001, 33(4): 300~304 [8] 彭聃龄, 邓园, 陈宝国. 汉语多义单字词的识别优势效应. 心理学报, 2003, 35(5): 569~575