The Influence of Cognitive Style on College Students' Implicit Learning Under Different Research Paradigms

Abstract

Abstract: This study adopted artificial grammar paradigm and serial reaction time paradigm to study whether cognitive style affect college students' implicit learning. The study showed that cognitive style did not affect the implicit learning, and this conclusion was not affected by experimental paradigms. Under artificial grammar paradigm and serial reaction time paradigm, the differences between field independent learner and field dependent learner of implicit learning were not significant. Under the artificial grammar paradigm, the collaborative learning of field independent learner was better than single implicit learning and explicit learning, and better than the collaborative learning of field dependent learner.

Key words: cognitive style, implicit learning, artificial grammar learning, serial reaction time

摘要： 通过两个实验，考察了不同认知风格大学生在人工语法任务、序列反应时任务中的成绩差异性表现。结果表明，场独立与场依存者在两类任务中内隐学习量的差异性表现一致，均无显著差异。进一步比较两种认知风格大学生在人工语法范式下内隐、外显及内隐外显协同学习类型中的差异表现时发现，场独立者的协同学习成绩优于单独的内隐学习和外显学习，且优于场依存者的协同学习。

关键词: 认知风格, 内隐学习, 人工语法, 序列反应时

CLC Number:

B842.5

LI Yanfen, ZHAO Ningning, ZHOU Tiemin. The Influence of Cognitive Style on College Students' Implicit Learning Under Different Research Paradigms[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(5): 606-612.

李艳芬, 赵宁宁, 周铁民. 不同内隐学习任务在不同认知风格个体上的成绩差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 606-612.

References

卜伟. (2014). 认知风格、性别与内隐语法学习关系实证研究. 安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版), 31(2), 91-93.
曹冬云, 邱婷, 谢云, 杨南昌. (2013). 文本呈现方式、认知风格、自我感受对大学生电脑屏幕阅读成绩的影响研究. 课程与教学, (1), 81-85.
葛爱荣, 康倩, 郭金花. (2016). 场认知风格对错误记忆影响的实验研究. 遵义师范学院学报, 18(1), 78-81.
郭秀艳. (2003). 内隐学习. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
韩秀, 裴燕红. (2010). 大学生智力与认知风格对内隐序列学习的影响. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 48-53.
胡卫平, 程丽芳, 贾小娟, 韩蒙, 陈英和. (2015). 认知抑制对创造性科学问题提出的影响: 认知风格的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 13, 721-728.
马军朋, 叶卓尔, 林依, 高宏巍, 黄平, 林惠妍, … 金花. (2016). 认知风格影响归类过程中的神经活动——来自fMRI研究的证据. 心理发展与教育, 32(2), 139-148.
王瑛. (2013). 认知风格对二语词义猜测影响的实证研究. 外语研究, (3), 59-63.
吴国来, 沃建中, 白学军, 沈德立. (2006). 不同认知风格11岁儿童内隐序列学习的差异. 心理发展与教育, 22(1), 39-42.
张丹钢. (2010). 人工语法内隐学习上认知风格的差异研究. 考试周刊, (56), 229-230.
Allport, G. W.(1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Gebauer, G. F., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2007). Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 34-54.
Hilbert, S., Nakagawa, T. T., Puci, P., Zech, A., & Bühner, M. (2015). The digit span backwards task--Verbal and visual cognitive strategies in working memory assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31, 174-180.
Kaufman, S. B. (2006). Individual differences in implicit learning and its relationship to intelligence, learning, personality, and creativity: A structural equation modeling approach. Dissertation, Yale University.
Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., Stanley, W. B., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (1989). Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1083-1100.
Mefoh, P. C., & Ezeh, V. C. (2017). Effect of cognitive style on prospective-retrospective memory slips. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 76, 43-46.
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An Essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Tennant, M. (1988). Psychology and adult learning. London, UK: Rontledge.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1977). Field-dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 616-689.
Woolhouse, L. S., & Bayne, R. (2000). Personality and the use of intuition: Individual differences in strategy and performance on an implicit learning task. European Journal of Personality, 14, 157-169.

[1]	WANG Huandi, CHEN Shiping. The Impact of Conflict of Interest on the Proposed Adoption of Different Cognitive Style Decision-Makers [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(3): 415-421.
[2]	ZHANG Hongjia, WANG Ling, ZHANG Min. The Relations Among Creative Cognitive Style, Creative Personality, and Creative Thinking [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(1): 51-57.
[3]	Hu Xianqiu, Li Hailei, Zhang Wenxin. The Relationship between Cognitive Style and Entrepreneurial Intention of University Students: The Moderating Role of Gender [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(1): 87-94.
[4]	Hu Weiping, Cheng Lifang, Jia Xiaojuan, Han Meng, Chen Yinghe. The influence of Cognitive inhibition to Creative Scientific Problem Finding: Mediating Effect of Field Cognitive Style [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(6): 721-728.
[5]	Song Shujuan,Liu Huashan. Threat Effect of Mathematics-Gender Stereotype to Girls: The Moderating moderating effect of Field Cognitive Style [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(3): 302-305.
[6]	Yang Nan,Ye Zhuoer,Lin Yi,Gao Hongwei,Huang Ping,Lin Huiyan,Xue Huan,Ma Junpeng,Jin Hua. The Neural Basis of Cognitive Style: an Resting-state fMRI study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(3): 320-327.
[7]	Yan Tingting, Du Xiufang, Li Jia. The influence of Emotions and Cognitive Styles on Advice Taking [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(5): 601-608.
[8]	Li Zhen, Liu Xinchun, Zhai Ruilong,Liu Fang, Deng Jingjing, Cheng Cheng, Yang Li. Chinese Adult Mental Health Diathesis Assessment System:A National Sampling Survey Report of Chinese Adults Cognitive Style [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(5): 621-626.
[9]	Cai Xiaohong, Deng Nali, Dai Xiaoqing, Li Shan, Huang Jiyi, Zeng Xiaoqing. The Effects of Reasoning Ability,Cognitive Style and Elicitation on Different Stages of Insight Problem Solving [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(4): 484-489.
[10]	Yang Li；Zhai Ruilong；Qi Zhenya；Wang Yuefei. Psychological Health Diathesis Measurement System: The Development [J]. , 2012, 10(5): 332-339.
[11]	Lu Zhanglong；Lv Yong；Bai Xuejun. ATTENTION LOAD HAS NO EFFECT ON IMPLICIT SEQUENCE LEARNING：AN EYE MOVEMENT STUDY [J]. , 2011, 9(3): 214-218.
[12]	Wang Jing,Chen Yinghe. THE PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESS IN UNDERGRADUATE COOPERATIVE LEARNING GROUP AND ITS INFLUENCE ON PROBLEM SOLVING LEVEL [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2009, 7(4): 258-264.
[13]	Li Shouxin；Luo Liang；Gong Dazhi；Dai Guixu. INFLUENCE OF PRESENTATION MODES AND COGNITIVE STYLES ON THE EFFECTS OF TEXT SIGNALS [J]. , 2009, 7(2): 104-108.
[14]	Ge Cao；Bai Xuejun. THE DIFFICULTY OF RULES OF MATERIALS INFLUENCED ON THE SYNERGISTIC LEARNING OF IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT [J]. , 2009, 7(2): 121-126.
[15]	Li Meihua. ON THE ROLE OF IMPLICIT LEARNING IN THE SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2008, 6(4): 316-318.