
Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2025, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 249-256.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2025.02.014
• ? • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yifeng WU1, Xin LI1, Huili CHEN1, Tong DING1, Juan HOU*,1,2(
)
Received:2024-10-23
Online:2025-03-20
Published:2025-03-20
Contact:
Juan HOU
吴一枫1, 李欣1, 陈慧丽1, 丁童1, 侯娟*,1,2(
)
通讯作者:
侯娟
基金资助:Yifeng WU, Xin LI, Huili CHEN, Tong DING, Juan HOU. Feel the Connection, Spread the Word: How Self-Relevance in News Sparks Sharing[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(2): 249-256.
吴一枫, 李欣, 陈慧丽, 丁童, 侯娟. 情同己身,传之于众:新闻的自我相关性提高分享意愿[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(2): 249-256.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/EN/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2025.02.014
| 新闻材料类型 | 数量 | 效价(M±SD) | 唤醒度(M±SD) |
| 积极低唤醒 | 2 | 5.76±0.01 | 4.69±0.49 |
| 积极高唤醒 | 4 | 7.34±0.25 | 6.15±0.31 |
| 消极低唤醒 | 4 | 4.19±0.29 | 4.75±0.56 |
| 消极高唤醒 | 2 | 2.92±0.66 | 6.51±0.23 |
| 新闻材料类型 | 数量 | 效价(M±SD) | 唤醒度(M±SD) |
| 积极低唤醒 | 2 | 5.76±0.01 | 4.69±0.49 |
| 积极高唤醒 | 4 | 7.34±0.25 | 6.15±0.31 |
| 消极低唤醒 | 4 | 4.19±0.29 | 4.75±0.56 |
| 消极高唤醒 | 2 | 2.92±0.66 | 6.51±0.23 |
| M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1.性别 | ||||||
| 2.新闻自我相关性 | 164.28 | 28.80 | −0.13*** | |||
| 3.情绪唤醒度 | 83.30 | 13.38 | −0.16*** | 0.86*** | ||
| 4.情绪效价强度 | 101.03 | 28.35 | −0.07** | 0.65*** | 0.69*** | |
| 5.新闻分享意愿 | 136.97 | 21.11 | −0.14*** | 0.76*** | 0.73*** | 0.63*** |
| M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1.性别 | ||||||
| 2.新闻自我相关性 | 164.28 | 28.80 | −0.13*** | |||
| 3.情绪唤醒度 | 83.30 | 13.38 | −0.16*** | 0.86*** | ||
| 4.情绪效价强度 | 101.03 | 28.35 | −0.07** | 0.65*** | 0.69*** | |
| 5.新闻分享意愿 | 136.97 | 21.11 | −0.14*** | 0.76*** | 0.73*** | 0.63*** |
| 路径 | 男生组 | 女生组 | 全样本 | ||||||||
| 95%CI | p | 效应值 | 95%CI | p | 效应值 | 95%CI | p | 效应值 | |||
| 自我相关性→情绪唤醒度→分享意愿 | [0.14, 0.36] | <0.001 | 0.24 | [0.05, 0.23] | 0.002 | 0.14 | [0.11, 0.26] | <0.001 | 0.19 | ||
| 自我相关性→情绪效价强度→分享意愿 | [0.08, 0.20] | <0.001 | 0.14 | [0.04, 0.15] | <0.001 | 0.09 | [0.08, 0.16] | <0.001 | 0.12 | ||
| 自我相关性→分享意愿 | [0.14, 0.38] | <0.001 | 0.26 | [0.37, 0.56] | <0.001 | 0.46 | [0.29, 0.44] | <0.001 | 0.37 | ||
| 总效应 | [0.56, 0.74] | <0.001 | 0.65 | [0.63, 0.76] | <0.001 | 0.69 | [0.62, 0.73] | <0.001 | 0.67 | ||
| 路径 | 男生组 | 女生组 | 全样本 | ||||||||
| 95%CI | p | 效应值 | 95%CI | p | 效应值 | 95%CI | p | 效应值 | |||
| 自我相关性→情绪唤醒度→分享意愿 | [0.14, 0.36] | <0.001 | 0.24 | [0.05, 0.23] | 0.002 | 0.14 | [0.11, 0.26] | <0.001 | 0.19 | ||
| 自我相关性→情绪效价强度→分享意愿 | [0.08, 0.20] | <0.001 | 0.14 | [0.04, 0.15] | <0.001 | 0.09 | [0.08, 0.16] | <0.001 | 0.12 | ||
| 自我相关性→分享意愿 | [0.14, 0.38] | <0.001 | 0.26 | [0.37, 0.56] | <0.001 | 0.46 | [0.29, 0.44] | <0.001 | 0.37 | ||
| 总效应 | [0.56, 0.74] | <0.001 | 0.65 | [0.63, 0.76] | <0.001 | 0.69 | [0.62, 0.73] | <0.001 | 0.67 | ||
| 模型 | CMIN/df | p | RMSEA | NFI | CFI | GFI |
| 基线模型 | 1.665 | 0.007 | 0.025 | 0.996 | 0.998 | 0.994 |
| 测量加权模型 | 2.106 | 0.009 | 0.033 | 0.994 | 0.997 | 0.991 |
| 结构加权模型 | 2.561 | <0.001 | 0.039 | 0.990 | 0.994 | 0.984 |
| 结构协方差模型 | 2.557 | <0.001 | 0.040 | 0.990 | 0.994 | 0.984 |
| 测量误差模型 | 2.825 | <0.001 | 0.042 | 0.985 | 0.990 | 0.977 |
| 模型 | CMIN/df | p | RMSEA | NFI | CFI | GFI |
| 基线模型 | 1.665 | 0.007 | 0.025 | 0.996 | 0.998 | 0.994 |
| 测量加权模型 | 2.106 | 0.009 | 0.033 | 0.994 | 0.997 | 0.991 |
| 结构加权模型 | 2.561 | <0.001 | 0.039 | 0.990 | 0.994 | 0.984 |
| 结构协方差模型 | 2.557 | <0.001 | 0.040 | 0.990 | 0.994 | 0.984 |
| 测量误差模型 | 2.825 | <0.001 | 0.042 | 0.985 | 0.990 | 0.977 |
| 模型 | ΔCMIN | Δdf | p | ΔNFI | ΔIFI | RhoRFI | RhoTLI |
| 测量加权模型 | 9.512 | 2 | <0.001 | −0.002 | −0.001 | −0.003 | −0.003 |
| 结构加权模型 | 19.187 | 5 | <0.001 | −0.004 | −0.003 | −0.002 | −0.002 |
| 结构协方差模型 | 2.473 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 测量误差模型 | 27.134 | 7 | <0.001 | −0.005 | −0.004 | −0.002 | −0.002 |
| 模型 | ΔCMIN | Δdf | p | ΔNFI | ΔIFI | RhoRFI | RhoTLI |
| 测量加权模型 | 9.512 | 2 | <0.001 | −0.002 | −0.001 | −0.003 | −0.003 |
| 结构加权模型 | 19.187 | 5 | <0.001 | −0.004 | −0.003 | −0.002 | −0.002 |
| 结构协方差模型 | 2.473 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 测量误差模型 | 27.134 | 7 | <0.001 | −0.005 | −0.004 | −0.002 | −0.002 |
|
陈春萍, 程大志, 罗跃嘉. 雌激素对情绪的影响: 心理, 神经, 内分泌研究. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2011, 41 (11): 1049- 1062.
|
|
|
陈爽, 张铮, 王可欣, 周明洁. 社会事件类微博的情绪性对信息传播的影响——卷入度的作用. 传播与社会学刊, 2017, (41): 119- 147.
|
|
|
丁松云, 王勇, 柯青. 情绪刺激对微博信息分享意愿的影响实证研究. 现代情报, 2019, 39 (3): 35- 45.
DOI |
|
|
李宏, 刘菲菲. 基于情绪视角的营销信息分享述评与展望. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40 (9): 143- 152.
|
|
|
廖圣清, 舒瑾涵. 标题效价对新媒体平台新闻分享的影响. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2023, 45 (3): 133- 142.
|
|
|
刘伟, 刘昱彤, 李纯青, 齐捧虎. 刷屏的原理: 在线内容的病毒式分享机制. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28 (4): 638- 649.
|
|
|
刘晓婷, 张宁. 青少年早期睡眠问题的发展: 性别差异及正性负性情绪的作用. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40 (4): 551- 562.
|
|
|
荣泰生. (2010). AMOS与研究方法 (第2版). 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
|
|
|
石密, 刘春雷, 时勘, 刘建准. 影响网络集体行为意向的情绪感染路径研究——基于情绪-信息的理论视角. 情报杂志, 2018, 37 (11): 103- 109, 121.
DOI |
|
|
谭群, 尹月阳, 刘燊, 韩尚锋, 徐强, 张林. 自我积极表情加工优势效应: 来自ERPs的证据. 心理学报, 2018, 50 (10): 1120- 1130.
|
|
|
吴明隆. (2009). 结构方程模型: AMOS的操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
|
|
|
袁加锦, 汪宇, 鞠恩霞, 李红. 情绪加工的性别差异及神经机制. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18 (12): 1899- 1908.
|
|
|
张梅, 丁书恒, 刘国芳, 徐亚珍, 傅鑫媛, 张巍, 辛自强. 网络突发事件中的负性偏向: 产生与表现. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (12): 1361- 1375.
|
|
|
周浩, 龙立荣. 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12 (6): 942- 950.
DOI |
|
|
Aritonang, I. R., Lasmana, S., & Kurnia, D. The analysis of skimming and scanning technique to improve students in teaching reading comprehension. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 2018, 1 (2): 101- 106.
|
|
|
Baek, E. C., Scholz, C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Falk, E. B. The value of sharing information: A neural account of information transmission. Psychological Science, 2017, 28 (7): 851- 861.
DOI |
|
|
Balzarotti, S., & Ciceri, M. R. News reports of catastrophes and viewers’ fear: Threat appraisal of positively versus negatively framed events. Media Psychology, 2014, 17 (4): 357- 377.
DOI |
|
|
Berger, J. Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science, 2011, 22 (7): 891- 893.
DOI |
|
|
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
|
|
|
Bliss-Moreau, E., Williams, L. A., & Santistevan, A. C. The immutability of valence and arousal in the foundation of emotion. Emotion, 2020, 20 (6): 993- 1004.
DOI |
|
|
Boehmer, J., & Tandoc, E. C., Jr. Why we retweet: Factors influencing intentions to share sport news on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 2015, 8 (2): 212- 232.
DOI |
|
|
Carbone, E., Loewenstein, G., Scopelliti, I., & Vosgerau, J. He said, she said: Gender differences in the disclosure of positive and negative information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2024, 110, 104525.
DOI |
|
|
Cosme, D., Scholz, C., Chan, H. Y., Doré, B. P., Pandey, P., Carreras-Tartak, J., ... Falk, E. B. Message self and social relevance increases intentions to share content: Correlational and causal evidence from six studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2023, 152 (1): 253- 267.
|
|
|
de Hoog, N., & Verboon, P. Is the news making us unhappy? The influence of daily news exposure on emotional states. British Journal of Psychology, 2020, 111 (2): 157- 173.
DOI |
|
|
Fields, E. C., & Kuperberg, G. R. It’s all about you: An ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse. NeuroImage, 2012, 62 (1): 562- 574.
DOI |
|
|
García-Perdomo, V., Salaverría, R., Kilgo, D. K., & Harlow, S. To share or not to share: The influence of news values and topics on popular social media content in the United States, Brazil, and Argentina. Journalism Studies, 2017, 19 (8): 1180- 1201.
|
|
|
Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., Horton, N. J., Makris, N., Kennedy, D. N., Caviness, V. S., ... Tsuang, M. T. Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 2001, 11 (6): 490- 497.
DOI |
|
|
Gross, J. J. Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 2015, 26 (1): 1- 26.
DOI |
|
|
Hasell, A. Shared emotion: The social amplification of partisan news on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 2021, 9 (8): 1085- 1102.
DOI |
|
|
Hille, S., & Bakker, P. I like news. Searching for the ‘Holy Grail’ of social media: The use of Facebook by Dutch news media and their audiences. European Journal of Communication, 2013, 28 (6): 663- 680.
DOI |
|
|
Hofer, A., Siedentopf, C. M., Ischebeck, A., Rettenbacher, M. A., Verius, M., Felber, S., & Fleischhacker, W. W. Gender differences in regional cerebral activity during the perception of emotion: a functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 2006, 32 (2): 854- 862.
DOI |
|
|
Ihm, J., & Kim, E. M. My news, your news, and our news: Self-presentational motivations and three levels of issue relevance in news sharing on social media. New Media & Society, 2024, 26 (3): 243- 263.
|
|
|
Klein, S. B., & Kihlstrom, J. F. Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1986, 115 (1): 26- 38.
DOI |
|
|
Landman, L. L., & van Steenbergen, H. Emotion and conflict adaptation: The role of phasic arousal and self-relevance. Cognition and Emotion, 2020, 34 (6): 1083- 1096.
DOI |
|
|
Löffler, C. S., & Greitemeyer, T. Are women the more empathetic gender? The effects of gender role expectations. Current Psychology, 2023, 42 (1): 220- 231.
DOI |
|
|
Mehrabian, A. (1995). Framework for a comprehensive description and measurement of emotional states. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 121(3), 339–361.
|
|
|
Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 2004, 130 (5): 711- 747.
DOI |
|
|
Naz, F., de Visser, R. O., & Mushtaq, M. Gender social roles: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 2022, 32 (2): 189- 200.
DOI |
|
|
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books/Hachette Book Group.
|
|
|
Prowten, S., Walker, E., London, B., Pearce, E., Napoli, A., Chenevert, B., ... Smith, A. R. Does physiological arousal increase social transmission of information? Two replications of Berger (2011). Psychological Science, 2024, 35 (9): 1025- 1034.
DOI |
|
|
Rimé, B. Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 2009, 1 (1): 60- 85.
DOI |
|
|
Rimé, B., Mesquita, B., Boca, S., & Philippot, P. Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 1991, 5 (5–6): 435- 465.
DOI |
|
|
Robertson, C. E., Pröllochs, N., Schwarzenegger, K., Pärnamets, P., van Bavel, J. J., & Feuerriegel, S. Negativity drives online news consumption. Nature Human Behaviour, 2023, 7 (5): 812- 822.
DOI |
|
|
Scholz, C., Baek, E. C., & Falk, E. B. Invoking self-related and social thoughts impacts online information sharing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2023, 18 (1): nsad013.
DOI |
|
|
Scholz, C., Baek, E. C., O’Donnell, M. B., Kim, H. S., Cappella, J. N., & Falk, E. B. A neural model of valuation and information virality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114 (11): 2881- 2886.
|
|
|
Sheldon, P. Examining gender differences in self-disclosure on Facebook versus face-to-face. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 2013, 2 (1): 88- 105.
|
|
|
Slattery, T. J., & Yates, M. Word skipping: Effects of word length, predictability, spelling and reading skill. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2018, 71 (1): 250- 259.
DOI |
|
|
Soroka, S., Gidengil, E., Fournier, P., & Nir, L. Do women and men respond differently to negative news. Politics & Gender, 2016, 12 (2): 344- 368.
|
|
|
Su, M. H., Liu, J. W., & McLeod, D. M. Pathways to news sharing: Issue frame perceptions and the likelihood of sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, 91, 201- 210.
DOI |
|
|
Wang, J. M., Zareapoor, M., Chen, Y. C., Shamsolmoali, P., & Xie, J. W. What influences news learning and sharing on mobile platforms? An analysis of multi-level informational factors. Library Hi Tech, 2023, 41 (5): 1395- 1419.
DOI |
| [1] | Zu’er LI, Jinqin HOU, Zhiyan CHEN. Intergenerational Transmission of Parental Harsh Discipline: Parental Interdependence and the Moderating Effect of Child’s Gender [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(1): 93-99. |
| [2] | Renjie LIU, Lingxiang XIA, Yongping ZHAO. Developmental Characteristics of Latent Class of Cybervictimization Among College Students and the Role of Gender [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 784-791. |
| [3] | Shuying XU, Shuguang CAI, Tingyong FENG. The Effect of Episodic Future Thinking on Delay Discounting: The Malleability of Episodic Prospective Ability [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(5): 592-599. |
| [4] | Min WU, Wenqi SONG, Jiawen JU. The Effect of Harsh Parenting on Sleep Quality of Children: The Mediating Effect of Core Self-Evaluation and Negative Emotions [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(3): 344-351. |
| [5] | ZHOU Aibao, ZHAO Haiyan, XIA Ruixue, YUAN Yue, JIA Tingting, XIE Pei. The Impact of Reference Styles, Emotional Valence, and Personality-Trait Assessment at Different Semantic Levels on Memory [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 145-152. |
| [6] | ZHAO Siyi, LI Ying, WANG Yue. The Metaphorical Association Between Valence and Space Influences Emotional Word Learning in Adults and Children [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 153-159. |
| [7] | GUO Qingtong, XU Mingxue, XU Chunyan, LIU Xiuli. The Relationship Between University Students’ Dormitory Relationship Disturbance and Mobile Phone Addiction: A Sequential Mediation Model and Gender Differences [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 650-656. |
| [8] | DU Xiayu, SHI Congrong, ZHAO Ziyi, XUE Ting. The Influence of Emotional Valence and Motivational Emotion on Creativity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(2): 160-165. |
| [9] | ZHONG Yiping, LI Mei, LI Jin, ZHAN Youlong. “Talking About Money Hurts Feelings”? The Influence of Sociality Mental Modes on Charitable Donation [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(3): 368-376,421. |
| [10] | HUANG Shihua, ZENG Yanfen, ZHANG Wei. How Emotional Valence Affect the Reactive Control and Proactive Control of college students with Different Level of Depression [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(6): 807-814. |
| [11] | Li Tiantian, Lv Yong. Facial Expressions Detection Threshold Measurement: Age-And Gender-Related Difference [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(6): 771-777. |
| [12] | Lan Xiaofang,Zhang Jinkun. The Gender Difference of FNE: Based on The Comparison of Implicit And Explicit Measurement [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(1): 25-30. |
| [13] | Zhong Yiping, Zhang Yuchi, Tian Sang, Guo Ke, Li Wenhe, Yan Yuping, Zhou Luping. Short-Term Exposure to Violent Media Games Leads to Sensitization to Violence:an ERP Research [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(6): 732-738. |
| [14] | Peng Weiwei. The Effect of Indirect Self-relevance and Debiasing strategies on Hindsight Bias in Legal Decision-making [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(4): 541-546. |
| [15] | Lu Yong,Yu Le,Liu Yaping. STUDIES ON GENDER DIFFERENCES IN FACE RECOGNITION ABILITY [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2010, 8(1): 18-22. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||