The Relationship Between Teacher-Student Relationship and Development Trajectories of Chinese High School Students’ Future Education Planning: A Longitudinal Study

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2025.04.015

Abstract

Abstract:

This study aimed to explore the trajectories of future education planning by employing a longitudinal, four-wave design. Moreover, this study examined the impact of teacher-student relationship. A total of 1977 high school students were longitudinally tracked to assess their teacher-student relationship (T1) and future education planning (T1~T4). The results of latent growth modeling analyses showed that: 1) the future education commitment of high school students presented a decreasing trend significantly in the period of 2 years; 2) the high school students’ future education exploration was heterogeneous, including a declining group and three growing groups; 3) the teacher-student relationship predicted the subgroup of the development trajectories of high school students’ future educational exploration, as well as the initial levels and development rate within each subgroup; 4) the teacher-student relationship predicted the initial levels and the downward trend of high school students’ future education commitment. These findings reveal the influence of teacher-student relationship on development of future education planning among high school students, providing suggestions for guiding high school future planning education.

Key words: future education planning, teacher-student relationship, longitudinal study

摘要：

对1977名高中生的未来教育规划进行为期2年的4次追踪测试，同时测试其师生关系，运用潜变量增长模型探讨高中生未来教育规划的发展轨迹并分析师生关系的影响。结果表明：(1)高中生未来教育投入呈下降趋势；(2)高中生未来教育探索的发展趋势存在异质性，有1个下降组与3个增长组；(3)师生关系能够预测高中生未来教育探索发展趋势的亚组，也能够预测各亚组内发展趋势的初始水平与发展速率；(4)师生关系能够预测高中生未来教育投入的初始水平及其下降趋势。研究结果不仅从人际关系理论的视角验证了师生关系对高中生未来教育规划发展轨迹的预测作用，也对高中生未来教育规划的指导实践有启示意义。

关键词: 未来教育规划, 师生关系, 追踪研究

Peng WU, Huiling TANG, Chunzi WANG-YANG. The Relationship Between Teacher-Student Relationship and Development Trajectories of Chinese High School Students’ Future Education Planning: A Longitudinal Study[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(4): 544-550.

吴鹏, 唐汇苓, 王杨春子. 师生关系与高中生未来教育规划发展趋势的关系：一项追踪研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(4): 544-550.

Figures/Tables 6

References 0

	崔海丽, 朱红, 马莉萍. 高中生涯教育对学生未来规划清晰程度的影响——以强基新生为考察对象. 教育发展研究, 2022, 42 (10): 67- 76. DOI
	邓之君, 朱小爽, 张和颐. 远虑解近忧——儿童青少年的未来时间洞察及其影响. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40 (4): 601- 608.
	黄希庭. (1999). 当代中国大学生心理特点与教育. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
	黄晓玲, 杨德军. 高考改革试点中家长对选科的认识及意向的调查分析. 复旦教育论坛, 2022, 20 (5): 21- 27. DOI
	康云菲, 刘宝存. 高中阶段“职普比”的全球图景. 教育研究, 2023, 44 (4): 80- 93.
	林崇德, 王耘, 姚计海. 师生关系与小学生自我概念的关系研究. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17 (4): 17- 22. DOI
	刘海峰, 韦骅峰. 新高考改革背景下高中生对高考选科认识及意向的调查分析. 教育发展研究, 2023, 43 (12): 1- 9, 17. DOI
	田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响: 有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40 (1): 44- 54.
	王新凤, 杨玉春. 新高考背景下高中生涯教育实施现状与政策期许. 中国教育学刊, 2023, (5): 29- 34.
	吴鹏, 王宇亮, 蒋星雨. 高中生未来职业规划的发展趋势: 基于潜变量增长模型的分析. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23 (1): 115- 122.
	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系: 一项追踪研究. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37 (5): 719- 726.
	许丹佳, 喻承甫, 窦凯, 梁梓勤, 利振华, 聂衍刚. 父母自主支持与青少年未来规划: 基本心理需要与个人成长主动性的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35 (1): 23- 31.
	于凤杰, 赵景欣, 张文新. 早中期青少年未来规划的发展及其与父母教养行为的关系: 行为自主的中介效应. 心理学报, 2013, 45 (6): 658- 671.
	张会杰. 考试招生“唯分数”的两难困境: 观念及制度的根源. 中国考试, 2019, (1): 10- 14, 39.
	张磊. (2003). 中学生师生关系的特点及其与学校适应的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 北京师范大学.
	张玲玲. (2005). 青少年未来取向的发展 (硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.
	张玲玲, 张文新, 纪林芹, Nurmi, J E. 青少年未来取向问卷中文版的测量学分析. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22 (1): 103- 108. DOI
	张玲玲, 张文新, 周秀琴, 胡艺馨, 王姝琼. 普高生与中职生的个人未来目标和担忧. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24 (4): 50- 55,60.
	周丹, 高一然, 边玉芳. 高中生未来取向的特征及其与友谊质量和自尊的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2016, 30 (10): 738- 744. DOI
	周浩, 龙立荣. 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12 (6): 942- 950. DOI
	周园. 高中生外部动机、自我效能感和自主性的关系及其对学业成绩的影响——基于中部地区某市46所中学的纵向数据. 教育测量与评价, 2016, (7): 60- 64.
	Ansari, A., Hofkens, T. L., & Pianta, R. C. Teacher-student relationships across the first seven years of education and adolescent outcomes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2020, 71, 01200.
	Bear, G. G., Yang, C. Y., Glutting, J., Huang, X. S., He, X. Y., Zhang, W., & Chen, D. D. Understanding teacher-student relationships, student-student relationships, and conduct problems in China and the United States. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 2014, 2 (4): 247- 260.
	Dearden, R. F. Happiness and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 1968, 2 (1): 17- 29. DOI
	Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., van Den Noortgate, W., Claes, S., … Verschueren, K. Behavioral engagement, peer status, and teacher-student relationships in adolescence: A longitudinal study on reciprocal influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2016, 45 (6): 1192- 1207. DOI
	Heatly, M. C., & Votruba-Drzal, E. Parent- and teacher-child relationships and engagement at school entry: Mediating, interactive, and transactional associations across contexts. Developmental Psychology, 2017, 53 (6): 1042- 1062. DOI
	Kalakoski, V., & Nurmi, J. E. Identity and educational transitions: Age differences in adolescent exploration and commitment related to education, occupation, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1998, 8 (1): 29- 47. DOI
	Krause, A., & Smith, J. D. Peer aggression and conflictual teacher-student relationships: A meta-analysis. School Mental Health, 2022, 14 (2): 306- 327. DOI
	Li, T. Y., Wang, Z., Merrin, G. J., Wan, S. R., Bi, K. W., Quintero, M., & Song, S. The joint operations of teacher-student and peer relationships on classroom engagement among low-achieving elementary students: A longitudinal multilevel study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2024, 77, 102258. DOI
	Massey, E. K., Gebhardt, W. A., & Garnefski, N. Adolescent goal content and pursuit: A review of the literature from the past 16 years. Developmental Review, 2008, 28 (4): 421- 460. DOI
	Nurmi, J. E. How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 1991, 11 (1): 1- 59. DOI
	Nurmi, J. E., Poole, M. E., & Kalakoski, V. Age differences in adolescent identity exploration and commitment in urban and rural environments. Journal of Adolescence, 1996, 19 (5): 443- 452. DOI
	Pakarinen, E., Silinskas, G., Hamre, B. K., Metsäpelto, R. L., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E. Cross-lagged associations between problem behaviors and teacher-student relationships in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 2018, 38 (8): 1100- 1141. DOI
	Robinson, C. D. A framework for motivating teacher-student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 2022, 34 (4): 2061- 2094. DOI
	Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 2011, 81 (4): 493- 529. DOI
	Shahaeian, A., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., & Wellman, H. M. Culture and the sequence of steps in theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 2011, 47 (5): 1239- 1247. DOI
	Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F., & Keating, D. P. Trajectories of educational aspirations through high school and beyond: A gendered phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Education, 2012, 35 (1): 239- 258.
	Shubert, J., Wray-Lake, L., & McKay, B. Looking ahead and working hard: How school experiences foster adolescents’ future orientation and perseverance. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2020, 30 (4): 989- 1007. DOI
	Thornberg, R., Forsberg, C., Chiriac, E. H., & Bjereld, Y. Teacher-student relationship quality and student engagement: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Research Papers in Education, 2022, 37 (6): 840- 859. DOI
	Uka, A. Students’ educational and occupational aspirations predicted by parents’ and adolescents’ characteristics. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 2015, 2 (1): 56- 67.
	Valkov, P., & Lavrentsova, E. The effects of student-teacher and student-student relationship on school engagement: An empirical research in Bulgaria. Pedagogy, 2019, 91 (3): 1- 13.
	Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 2013, 28, 12- 23. DOI
	Wilkinson, H. R., & Bartoli, A. J. Antisocial behaviour and teacher-student relationship quality: The role of emotion-related abilities and callous-unemotional traits. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2021, 91 (1): 482- 499. DOI
	Zhao, J. X., Li, R. J., Ma, J. L., & Zhang, W. X. Longitudinal relations between future planning and adolescents’ academic achievement in China. Journal of Adolescence, 2019, 75 (1): 73- 84. DOI

变量	M±SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
1.探索1	2.86±0.59
2.探索2	2.95±0.71	0.21^***
3.探索3	2.98±0.76	0.14^***	0.40^***
4.探索4	3.40±0.67	0.13^***	0.28^***	0.32^***
5.投入1	3.59±0.32	0.26^***	0.14^***	0.09^**	0.15^***
6.投入2	3.56±0.49	0.09^**	0.36^***	0.25^***	0.19^***	0.19^***
7.投入3	3.54±0.56	0.04	0.24^***	0.34^***	0.24^***	0.14^***	0.27^***
8.投入4	3.52±0.48	0.10^***	0.19^***	0.23^***	0.43^***	0.15^***	0.27^***	0.34^***
9.冲突性	2.07±0.61	−0.07	−0.05	−0.08^*	−0.06	−0.12^**	−0.08^*	−0.10^**	−0.08^*
10.依恋性	3.44±0.61	0.25^***	0.15^***	0.17^***	0.13^***	0.25^***	0.16^***	0.18^***	0.20^***	−0.15^***
11.亲密性	3.30±0.65	0.05^*	0.14^***	0.20^***	0.10^***	0.08^***	0.15^***	0.23^***	0.16^***	−0.24^***	0.26^***
12.回避性	1.91±0.75	−0.09^*	−0.05	−0.08^*	−0.09^*	−0.18^***	−0.10^**	−0.10^**	−0.07	0.79^***	−0.27^***	−0.23^***

变量	M±SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
1.探索1	2.86±0.59
2.探索2	2.95±0.71	0.21^***
3.探索3	2.98±0.76	0.14^***	0.40^***
4.探索4	3.40±0.67	0.13^***	0.28^***	0.32^***
5.投入1	3.59±0.32	0.26^***	0.14^***	0.09^**	0.15^***
6.投入2	3.56±0.49	0.09^**	0.36^***	0.25^***	0.19^***	0.19^***
7.投入3	3.54±0.56	0.04	0.24^***	0.34^***	0.24^***	0.14^***	0.27^***
8.投入4	3.52±0.48	0.10^***	0.19^***	0.23^***	0.43^***	0.15^***	0.27^***	0.34^***
9.冲突性	2.07±0.61	−0.07	−0.05	−0.08^*	−0.06	−0.12^**	−0.08^*	−0.10^**	−0.08^*
10.依恋性	3.44±0.61	0.25^***	0.15^***	0.17^***	0.13^***	0.25^***	0.16^***	0.18^***	0.20^***	−0.15^***
11.亲密性	3.30±0.65	0.05^*	0.14^***	0.20^***	0.10^***	0.08^***	0.15^***	0.23^***	0.16^***	−0.24^***	0.26^***
12.回避性	1.91±0.75	−0.09^*	−0.05	−0.08^*	−0.09^*	−0.18^***	−0.10^**	−0.10^**	−0.07	0.79^***	−0.27^***	−0.23^***

潜在类别个数	AIC	BIC	aBIC	Entropy	LMR LR
1	57786.09	57834.35	57805.76
2	57722.10	57786.45	57748.33	0.97	65.13^**
3	57724.65	57805.09	57757.44	0.98	45.61
4	57078.95	57175.48	57118.30	0.94	27.82^*
5	57735.46	57848.07	57781.36	0.98	19.27^*

潜在类别个数	AIC	BIC	aBIC	Entropy	LMR LR
1	57786.09	57834.35	57805.76
2	57722.10	57786.45	57748.33	0.97	65.13^**
3	57724.65	57805.09	57757.44	0.98	45.61
4	57078.95	57175.48	57118.30	0.94	27.82^*
5	57735.46	57848.07	57781.36	0.98	19.27^*

组别		B	SE	t	p
高水平快速增长组	截距(I)	3.02	0.05	65.67	<0.001
	斜率(S)	0.52	0.03	16.87	<0.001
低水平快速增长组	截距(I)	1.80	0.04	42.68	<0.001
	斜率(S)	0.87	0.14	6.44	<0.001
下降组	截距(I)	4.00	0.12	33.15	<0.001
	斜率(S)	−0.68	0.09	−7.46	<0.001
慢速增长组	截距(I)	2.95	0.02	179.81	<0.001
	斜率(S)	0.02	0.01	2.61	0.009