The Cognitive Mechanism of Direct and Averted Gazes on Object-Based Attention: The Role of Object Processing Style

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2026.01.003

Abstract

Abstract:

Existing research has shown that eye contact influences object-based attention, but the underlying mechanism that is, whether it primarily captures or maintains attention, remains unresolved. This ambiguity arises from differences in object processing styles (holistic vs. feature-based) across studies. Therefore, this study included four experiments by using the two-rectangle cueing paradigm and manipulating SOAs (300 ms, 600 ms, and 900 ms) to investigate this issue in holistic processing (Experiments 1 and 2) and feature-based processing (Experiments 3 and 4). The results of the four experiments consistently demonstrated that, at the 600 ms SOA, direct gaze elicited a larger object-based effect compared to averted gaze, indicating that eye contact’s influence on object-based attention is universal. However, in holistic processing, direct gaze enhanced attentional capture (supporting the sensory enhancement hypothesis), whereas in feature-based processing, it facilitated attentional maintenance (supporting the attention shift hypothesis). These findings suggest that eye contact’s impact on object-based attention also exhibits specificity, depending on the object processing style.

Key words: eye contact, object-based attention, two-rectangle cueing paradigm, holistic processing, feature-based processing

摘要：

已有研究表明目光注视影响客体注意，但这种影响的内部机制是直视捕获还是维持注意至今仍无定论，究其原因，是由于这些研究中使用的客体加工方式(整体vs.特征加工)不同。因此，本研究包含4个实验，采用双框线索范式，通过操纵SOA为300 ms、600 ms和900 ms，在整体加工(实验1和2)和特征加工(实验3和4)客体中考察以上问题。四个实验结果一致表明，600 ms SOA直视比回避条件均产生更大的客体注意效应，说明目光注视对客体注意的影响具有普遍性。但整体加工客体中直视更能捕获注意，支持了感觉增强理论；特征加工客体中直视更能维持注意，支持了注意转移理论，表明目光注视对客体注意的影响因客体加工方式的不同又具有特异性。

关键词: 目光注视, 客体注意, 双框线索范式, 整体加工, 特征加工

Jingjing ZHAO, Chi YAN, Yunfei GAO, Luyao WANG, Yonghui WANG. The Cognitive Mechanism of Direct and Averted Gazes on Object-Based Attention: The Role of Object Processing Style[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2026, 24(1): 23-31.

赵晶晶, 闫驰, 高云飞, 王璐瑶, 王勇慧. 目光注视影响客体注意的认知机制：客体加工方式的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2026, 24(1): 23-31.

Figures/Tables 5

References 0

	胡中华, 刘强, 赵光, 李红. 刺激特征信息影响直视探测优势测量. 心理学报, 2013, 45 (11): 1217- 1227. DOI
	闫驰, 高云飞, 胡赛赛, 宋方兴, 王勇慧, 赵晶晶. 目光注视线索对客体注意的影响及作用机制. 心理学报, 2022, 54 (7): 748- 760.
	Böckler, A., van der Wel, R. P. R. D., & Welsh, T. N. Catching eyes: Effects of social and nonsocial cues on attention capture. Psychological Science, 2014, 25 (3): 720- 727. DOI
	Brown, J. M., & Denney, H. I. Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage. Perception & Psychophysics, 2007, 69 (4): 606- 618. DOI
	Bruce, V., & Young, A. (2012). Face perception. London: Psychology Press.
	Bukach, C. M., Phillips, W. S., & Gauthier, I. (2010). Limits of generalization between categories and implications for theories of category specificity. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1865–1874.
	Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 2012, 44 (4): 1255- 1265. DOI
	Cavanagh, P., Caplovitz, G. P., Lytchenko, T. K., Maechler, M. R., Tse, P. U., & Sheinberg, D. L. The architecture of object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2023, 30 (5): 1643- 1667. DOI
	Chakravarthi, R., & Vanrullen, R. Conscious updating is a rhythmic process. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109 (26): 10599- 10604.
	Conci, M., & Müller, H. J. (2009). The “beam of darkness”: Spreading of the attentional blink within and between objects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(8), 1725–1738.
	Conty, L., N’Diaye, K., Tijus, C., & George, N. When eye creates the contact! ERP evidence for early dissociation between direct and averted gaze motion processing. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45 (13): 3024- 3037. DOI
	Dalmaso, M., Alessi, G., Castelli, L., & Galfano, G. Eye contact boosts the reflexive component of overt gaze following. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10 (1): 4777. DOI
	Dalmaso, M., Castelli, L., & Galfano, G. Attention holding elicited by direct-gaze faces is reflected in saccadic peak velocity. Experimental Brain Research, 2017, 235 (11): 3319- 3332. DOI
	Duncan, J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1984, 113 (4): 501- 517. DOI
	Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1994, 123 (2): 161- 177. DOI
	Eito, H., & Wakabayashi, A. Deficiency of object-based attention specific to the gaze cue is independent of top-down attentional strategies. Perception, 2023, 52 (5): 330- 344. DOI
	Elder, J. H., & Goldberg, R. M. Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. Journal of Vision, 2002, 2 (4): 5. DOI
	Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002, 99 (14): 9602- 9605. DOI
	Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 2009, 41 (4): 1149- 1160. DOI
	Fiebelkorn, I. C., Saalmann, Y. B., & Kastner, S. Rhythmic sampling within and between objects despite sustained attention at a cued location. Current Biology, 2013, 23 (24): 2553- 2558. DOI
	Francis, G., & Thunell, E. (2022). Excess success in articles on object-based attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(3), 700–714.
	Ganel, T., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., & Goodale, M. A. Interactions between the processing of gaze direction and facial expression. Vision Research, 2005, 45 (9): 1191- 1200. DOI
	Green, J. J., Gamble, M. L., & Woldorff, M. G. Resolving conflicting views: Gaze and arrow cues do not trigger rapid reflexive shifts of attention. Visual Cognition, 2013, 21 (1): 61- 71. DOI
	Helfrich, R. F., Fiebelkorn, I. C., Szczepanski, S. M., Lin, J. J., Parvizi, J., Knight, R. T., & Kastner, S. Neural mechanisms of sustained attention are rhythmic. Neuron, 2018, 99 (4): 854- 865. DOI
	Hietanen, J. K., Myllyneva, A., Helminen, T. M., & Lyyra, P. The effects of genuine eye contact on visuospatial and selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2016, 145 (9): 1102- 1106. DOI
	Huang, L., Chen, Y., Shen, S. Q., Ye, H. X., Ou, S. P., & Zhang, X. L. Awareness-independent gradual spread of object-based attention. Current Psychology, 2023, 42 (31): 27388- 27400. DOI
	Itier, R. J., Alain, C., Kovacevic, N., & McIntosh, A. R. Explicit versus implicit gaze processing assessed by ERPs. Brain Research, 2007, 1177, 79- 89. DOI
	Jeurissen, D., Self, M. W., & Roelfsema, P. R. Serial grouping of 2D-image regions with object-based attention in humans. eLife, 2016, 5, e14320. DOI
	Kawaguchi, Y., Nakamura, K., & Tomonaga, M. Colour matters more than shape for chimpanzees’ recognition of developmental face changes. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10 (1): 18201. DOI
	Kou, H., Gong, N. L., Yu, W. Y., Xie, Q. H., & Bi, T. Y. Visual attentional bias induced by face direction. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11, 1089. DOI
	Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science, 2001, 293 (5534): 1506- 1509. DOI
	Landau, A. N., & Fries, P. Attention samples stimuli rhythmically. Current Biology, 2012, 22 (11): 1000- 1004. DOI
	Marrara, M. T., & Moore, C. M. Object-based selection in the two-rectangles method is not an artifact of the three-sided directional cue. Perception & Psychophysics, 2003, 65 (7): 1103- 1109. DOI
	Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 1998, 9 (2): 104- 110. DOI
	Murphy, J., & Cook, R. Revealing the mechanisms of human face perception using dynamic apertures. Cognition, 2017, 169, 25- 35. DOI
	Newport, R., & Howarth, S. Short article: Social gaze cueing to auditory locations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009, 62 (4): 625- 634. DOI
	Peters, B., Kaiser, J., Rahm, B., & Bledowski, C. Object-based attention prioritizes working memory contents at a theta rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2021, 150 (6): 1250- 1256. DOI
	Richard, A. M., Lee, H., & Vecera, S. P. Attentional spreading in object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2008, 34 (4): 842- 853.
	Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. Taking control of reflexive social attention. Cognition, 2005, 94 (3): B55- B65. DOI
	Senju, A., & Hasegawa, T. Direct gaze captures visuospatial attention. Visual Cognition, 2005, 12 (1): 127- 144. DOI
	Shomstein, S. Object-based attention: Strategy versus automaticity. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2012, 3 (2): 163- 169.
	Shomstein, S., & Behrmann, M. Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance. Perception & Psychophysics, 2008, 70 (1): 132- 144. DOI
	Song, F., Zhou, S., Gao, Y., Hu, S., Zhang, T., Kong, F., & Zhao, J. Are you looking at me? Impact of eye contact on object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2021, 47 (6): 765- 773. DOI
	Stein, T., Senju, A., Peelen, M. V., & Sterzer, P. Eye contact facilitates awareness of faces during interocular suppression. Cognition, 2011, 119 (2): 307- 311. DOI
	Ushitani, T., Imura, T., & Tomonaga, M. Object-based attention in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Vision Research, 2010, 50 (6): 577- 584. DOI
	VanRullen, R. Visual attention: A rhythmic process. Current Biology, 2013, 23 (24): R1110- R1112. DOI
	Wong, A. C. N., Bukach, C. M., Hsiao, J., Greenspon, E., Ahern, E., Duan, Y. R., & Lui, K. F. H. Holistic processing as a hallmark of perceptual expertise for nonface categories including Chinese characters. Journal of Vision, 2012, 12 (13): 7. DOI
	Yeshurun, Y., & Rashal, E. The typical advantage of object-based attention reflects reduced spatial cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2017, 43 (1): 69- 77. DOI
	Yu, Z., Kritikos, A., & Pegna, A. J. Enhanced early ERP responses to looming angry faces. Biological Psychology, 2022, 170, 108308. DOI
	Zhao, J. J., Song, F. X., Zhou, S. C., Hu, S. S., Liu, D. W., Wang, Y. H., & Kong, F. The impact of monetary stimuli on object-based attention. British Journal of Psychology, 2020, 111 (3): 460- 472. DOI
	Zhao, M. T., Bülthoff, H. H., & Bülthoff, I. (2016). A shape-based account for holistic face processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(4), 584–597.

[1]	Qi CHEN, Saisai HU, Jingjing ZHAO, Yonghui WANG. Task Difficulty Modulates Horizontal Advantage Rather than Pure Object-Based Attention in the Two-Rectangle Cuing Paradigm [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(5): 586-594.
[2]	Zhuyang LI, Kaihui ZHANG, Qiaoming ZHANG, Lu LIU. The Boundary Condition of the Semantic Object-Based Attention: The Role of Object Representation [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(6): 747-752.
[3]	LYU Yong, LI Zhuyang, LIU Lu, ZHANG Jie. The Role of the Quality of Object-based Representation in Semantic Object-based Attention [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(3): 295-299.
[4]	Liu Donglai, Wang Yonghui. A Review of Studies on How Object-Based Attention was Influenced by Gestalt Principle Objects and Top-Down Fashion [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(4): 561-568.