The Sub-Word Boundary Effect of Chinese Character Position Processing in Incremental Words

  • GU Junjuan ,
  • GAO Zhihua ,
  • MA Shaoyang
Expand
  • 1. School of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210;
    2. School of Vocational Education, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin 300222

Received date: 2021-10-20

  Online published: 2022-01-20

Abstract

In the present study, we endeavored to explore whether the sub-word boundary effect exists in character position processing of incremental words in Chinese. We used the head-embedded incremental word (e.g., 历史系) and tail-embedded incremental word (e.g., 核技术) as our targets. We embedded the target words into sentences and then manipulated the previews of the words using the boundary paradigm. The preview was identical to the target word (identity condition), had the last two characters of the target word transposed (TC condition), or had the last two characters that were different from those in the target word (SC condition). For the head-embedded incremental word, the fixation durations on the targets in the SC condition were much longer than those in the TC condition, but were not significantly different between the identity condition and TC condition. For the tail-embedded incremental word, the fixation durations on the targets in the TC condition were much longer than those in the identity condition, but were not significantly different between the SC condition and TC condition. These results indicate that transposing two characters across sub-word boundaries have no effect on word recognition. However, word identification is inhibited when the beginning character of embedded words is involved in transposition.

Cite this article

GU Junjuan , GAO Zhihua , MA Shaoyang . The Sub-Word Boundary Effect of Chinese Character Position Processing in Incremental Words[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022 , 20(1) : 1 -7 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.001

References

顾俊娟, 高志华, 屈青青. (2020). 汉字位置加工的词边界效应. 心理与行为研究, 18(2), 193–199
顾俊娟, 石金富. (2021). 汉字位置加工和词边界效应的认知机制. 心理科学进展, 29(2), 191–201
滑慧敏, 顾俊娟, 林楠, 李兴珊. (2017). 视觉词汇识别中的字符位置编码. 心理科学进展, 25(7), 1132–1138
李馨, 白学军, 闫国利. (2011). 词边界信息和词频在汉语阅读中的作用. 心理与行为研究, 9(2), 133–139
张慢慢, 臧传丽, 徐宇峰, 白学军, 闫国利. (2020). 快速与慢速读者的中央凹加工对副中央凹预视的影响. 心理学报, 52(8), 933–945
Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1277–1287, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277.
Davis, C. J., & Taft, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 904–910.
Gu, J. J., & Li, X. S. (2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(1), 272–281.
Gu, J. J., Li, X. S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Character order processing in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 127–137, doi: 10.1037/a0038639.
Johnson, R. L. (2007). The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 425–440). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1), 209–229, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209.
Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2009). Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 1–18.
Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139–1162, doi: 10.1037/rev0000248.
Li, X. S., Gu, J. J., Liu, P. P., & Rayner, K. (2013). The advantage of word-based processing in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 879–889.
Marcet, A., Perea, M., Baciero, A., & Gomez, P. (2019). Can letter position encoding be modified by visual perceptual elements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(6), 1344–1353, doi: 10.1177/1747021818789876.
Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Parafoveal preprocessing of word initial trigrams during reading in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 411–432.
Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130(2), 127–137, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.001.
Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55(6), 384–393, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384.
Perea, M., Marcet, A., & Gómez, P. (2016). How do Scrabble players encode letter position during reading. Psicothema, 28(1), 7–12.
Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(2), 301–314.
Perea, M., Winskel, H., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012). On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: The case of Thai. Experimental Psychology, 59(2), 68–73, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000127.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81, doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(4), 745–765, doi: 10.1080/02724980343000477.
Taft, M., Xu, J., & Li, S. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 14–25, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.002.
Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2015). Children’s and adults’ parafoveal processes in German: Phonological and orthographic effects. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 531–548, doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.999076.
White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word-beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1261–1276, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1261.
Winskel, H., & Perea, M. (2013). Consonant/vowel asymmetries in letter position coding during normal reading: Evidence from parafoveal previews in Thai. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 119–130, doi: 10.1080/20445911.2012.753077.
Zang, C., Liang, F., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Interword spacing and landing position effects during Chinese reading in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 720–734, doi: 10.1037/a0030097.
Zhou, J., & Li, X. (2021). On the segmentation of Chinese incremental words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(8), 1353–1368.
Zhou, J. Y., Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Taft, M. (2018). The time course of incremental word processing during Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 31(3), 607–625, doi: 10.1007/s11145-017-9800-y.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of Studies of Psychology and Behavior
Tel: 022-23540231, 23541213 E-mail: psybeh@126.com