The Impact of Description-Experience Conflict on Individual Risky Decision-Making: Decision Model Fitting

  • ZHOU Guangfang ,
  • WEI Zihan ,
  • OUYANG Liangyuan ,
  • NGURE Mary Muthoni ,
  • WANG Xiaozhuang
Expand
  • 1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387;
    4. Tianjin Vocational College of Mechanics and Electricity, Tianjin 300350

Received date: 2021-07-12

  Online published: 2022-01-20

Abstract

This study used the description-experience conflict paradigm to investigate the influence of description-experience inconsistency on individual risk choices in gain and loss situations, and explore its internal mechanism through decision model fitting. Both Study 1a and Study 1b adopted a single-factor between-subjects design. The independent variable was the degree of inconsistency between description and experience, and the dependent variable was the proportion of risky choices (R-rate). Results showed that in gain situations, the R-rate was not significantly influenced by degree of inconsistency between description and experience; while in the loss situations, the R-rate was significantly influenced. Study 2 found that the description’s weight parameter (ξ) in the gain situations was significantly smaller than that in the loss situations; while the recency parameter (?) was significantly larger than that in the loss situations. Therefore, under the condition of description-experience inconsistency, the individuals in loss situations were more inclined to make decisions based on the descriptive information than those in the gain situations.

Cite this article

ZHOU Guangfang , WEI Zihan , OUYANG Liangyuan , NGURE Mary Muthoni , WANG Xiaozhuang . The Impact of Description-Experience Conflict on Individual Risky Decision-Making: Decision Model Fitting[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022 , 20(1) : 29 -36 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.005

References

高青林, 周媛. (2021). 计算模型视角下信任形成的心理和神经机制——基于信任博弈中投资者的角度. 心理科学进展, 29(1), 178–189
项鑫, 王乙. (2021). 中国人口老龄化现状、特点、原因及对策. 中国老年学杂志, 41(18), 4149–4152
张力元, 毕研玲, 张宝山, 陈璐. (2015). 老年人行为决策: 领域现状与挑战. 心理科学进展, 23(5), 858–870
Asgarova, R., Macaskill, A. C., & Hunt, M. J. (2020). Gain-loss asymmetry in experiential probability discounting. The Psychological Record, 70(3), 359–371, doi: 10.1007/s40732-020-00379-1.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370, doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.
Bodenhausen, G. V., Gabriel, S., & Lineberger, M. (2000). Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bias: The case of anchoring. Psychological Science, 11(4), 320–323, doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00263.
Dai, J. Y., Kerestes, R., Upton, D. J., Busemeyer, J. R., & Stout, J. C. (2015). An improved cognitive model of the Iowa and Soochow Gambling Tasks with regard to model fitting performance and tests of parameter consistency. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 229.
Don, H. J., Otto, A. R., Cornwall, A. C., Davis, T., & Worthy, D. A. (2019). Learning reward frequency over reward probability: A tale of two learning rules. Cognition, 193, 104042, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104042.
Dong, G. H., Lin, X., Zhou, H. L., & Du, X. X. (2014). Decision-making after continuous wins or losses in a randomized guessing task: Implications for how the prior selection results affect subsequent decision-making. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 10(1), 1–11, doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-10-1.
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). car: Companion to Applied Regression (Version 4. 0. 2) . Retrieved February 7, 2020, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/car/index.html
Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Processing differences between descriptions and experience: A comparative analysis using eye-tracking and physiological measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 173.
Gurevich, G. (2017). Description-experience gap in choice under risk: Are emotions involved? Retrieved June 30, 2019, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2921415
Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15(8), 534–539, doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x.
Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Good things don’t come easy (to mind): Explaining framing effects in judgments of truth. Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 38–46, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000124.
Jessup, R. K., Bishara, A. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2008). Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice. Psychological Science, 19(10), 1015–1022, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02193.x.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341.
Lebreton, M., Bacily, K., Palminteri, S., & Engelmann, J. B. (2019). Contextual influence on confidence judgments in human reinforcement learning. PLoS Computational Biology, 15(4), e1006973, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006973.
Lee, D., Seo, H., & Jung, M. W. (2012). Neural basis of reinforcement learning and decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 287–308, doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150512.
Lejarraga, T., & Gonzalez, C. (2011). Effects of feedback and complexity on repeated decisions from description. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 286–295, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.001.
Packard, M. G., & Knowlton, B. J. (2002). Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 563–593, doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142937.
Schonberg, T., Daw, N. D., Joel, D., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2007). Reinforcement learning signals in the human striatum distinguish learners from nonlearners during reward-based decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(47), 12860–12867, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2496-07.2007.
Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2001). Better negative than positive? Evidence of a bias for negative information about possible health dangers. Risk Analysis, 21(1), 199–206, doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.211102.
Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315(5811), 515–518, doi: 10.1126/science.1134239.
Weiss-Cohen, L., Konstantinidis, E., Speekenbrink, M., & Harvey, N. (2016). Incorporating conflicting descriptions into decisions from experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 135, 55–69, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.005.
Weiss-Cohen, L., Konstantinidis, E., Speekenbrink, M., & Harvey, N. (2018). Task complexity moderates the influence of descriptions in decisions from experience. Cognition, 170, 209–227, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.005.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of Studies of Psychology and Behavior
Tel: 022-23540231, 23541213 E-mail: psybeh@126.com