Multi-Word Unit Processing for Chinese Older Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements

  • HE Liyuan ,
  • ZHAO Xing ,
  • BAI Yu ,
  • LIU Nina
Expand
  • 1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387

Received date: 2021-10-14

  Online published: 2022-03-20

Abstract

In order to explore the reasons underlying older readers’ inefficient reading, the present study selected three types of two two-character word combinations to investigate how Chinese older adults process multi-word units. Three types of word combinations included single-word combination (which was comprised of frequently co-occurred two words and was typically considered as single four-character word), ambiguous word combination (which expressed a complete idea but was considered as single word by roughly half of readers), and two-word combination (which was not able to convey a whole meaning and was also considered as two words). Younger and older participants were asked to read sentences containing critical word combinations while their eye movements were monitored. The results showed that: 1) older readers made more and longer fixations and less frequently skipped a word compared to young readers, showing typical reading difficulties; 2) both groups of participants spent shorter time on single four-character words and made fewer fixations during first-run reading than those on the ambiguous combinations as well as the two-word combinations. The same pattern also appeared in the first word and second word processing, indicating that multiple word units showed a processing advantage. However, there was no significant age difference in such processing advantage. These findings suggest that older readers process the multi-word units as a whole.

Cite this article

HE Liyuan , ZHAO Xing , BAI Yu , LIU Nina . Multi-Word Unit Processing for Chinese Older Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022 , 20(2) : 160 -166 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.02.003

References

付彧, 何立媛, 吴蕊涵, 闫国利. (2015). 不同年级学生词边界划分的发展研究. 心理与行为研究, 13(1), 59–64, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2015.01.010
闫国利, 张兰兰, 孙莎莎, 白学军. (2013). 汉语“主观词”的表征及其加工. 心理学报, 45(4), 379–390
易维, 鹿士义. (2013). 语块的心理现实性. 心理科学进展, 21(12), 2110–2117
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Bod, R. (2006). Exemplar-based syntax: How to get productivity from examples. The Linguistic Review, 23(3), 291–320.
Bybee, J. L. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733, doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0186.
Cutter, M. G., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2014). Preview benefit in English spaced compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1778–1786.
He, L. Y., Song, Z. M., Chang, M., Zang, C. L., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). Contrasting off-line segmentation decisions with on-line word segmentation during reading. British Journal of Psychology, 112(3), 662–689, doi: 10.1111/bjop.12482.
Li, S., Li, L., Wang, J. X., McGowan, V. A., & Paterson, K. B. (2018). Effects of word length on eye guidance differ for young and older Chinese readers. Psychology and Aging, 33(4), 685–692, doi: 10.1037/pag0000258.
Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139–1162, doi: 10.1037/rev0000248.
Liu, P. P., Li, W. J., Lin, N., & Li, X. S. (2013). Do Chinese readers follow the national standard rules for word segmentation during reading. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e55440, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055440.
Liu, P. P., Liu, D. L., Han, B. X., & Paterson, K. B. (2015). Aging and the optimal viewing position effect in Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1656.
Liversedge, S. P. (2013, August). Rethinking theoretical frameworks: Studies of eye movements during non-alphabetic reading and reading development. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM), Lund, Sweden.
Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., Warrington, K. L., Li, L., Li, S., Xie, F., … Wang, J. X. (2020). Effects of normative aging on eye movements during reading. Vision, 4(1), 7, doi: 10.3390/vision4010007.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Wechsler, D., Chen, Y. H., & Chen, X. Y. (2002). WAIS-III Chinese version technical manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication, 20(1), 1–28.
Yu, J., Li, J., & Huang, X. (2012). The Beijing version of the montreal cognitive assessment as a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment: A community-based study. BMC Psychiatry, 12(1), 156, doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-156.
Yu, L. L., Cutter, M. G., Yan, G. L., Bai, X. J., Fu, Y., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Word n+2 preview effects in three-character Chinese idioms and phrases. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(9), 1130–1149.
Zang, C. L. (2019). New perspectives on serialism and parallelism in oculomotor control during reading: The multi-constituent unit hypothesis. Vision, 3(4), 50, doi: 10.3390/vision3040050.
Zang, C. L., Fu, Y., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). Foveal and parafoveal processing of Chinese three-character idioms in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 119, 104243, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2021.104243.
Zhao, S. N., Li, L., Chang, M., Xu, Q. Q., Zhang, K., Wang, J. X., & Paterson, K. B. (2019). Older adults make greater use of word predictability in Chinese reading. Psychology and Aging, 34(6), 780–790, doi: 10.1037/pag0000382.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of Studies of Psychology and Behavior
Tel: 022-23540231, 23541213 E-mail: psybeh@126.com