Studies of Psychology and Behavior

Studies of Psychology and Behavior >

2022 , Vol. 20 >Issue 5: 692 - 699

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.05.017

The Relationship Between the Big Five Personality and the Trajectory of High School Freshmen’s Subjective Social Status During the School Transition Period: A Latent Growth Curve Model

  • CHENG Gang ,
  • ZOU Yan ,
  • YU Wei ,
  • DING Fangyuan ,
  • JIA Yuncheng
Expand
  • 1. School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025;
    2. Department of Scientific Research, The Second People’s Hospital of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550004;
    3. College of General Education, Chongqing Water Resources and Electric Engineering College, Chongqing 402160;
    4. Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
    5. College of National Culture and Cognitive Science, Guizhou Minzu University, Guiyang 550025

Received date: 2021-03-31

  Online published: 2022-09-20

Fold

Abstract

The current study aimed to investigate the developmental trajectory of subjective social status (SSS) and the role of personality dimension of high school freshmen in their transition period. A total of 546 high school freshmen participated in four tests with one-month intervals throughout the first semester of high school. The results of latent growth models showed that: 1) The growth trajectory of SSS of high school freshmen was piecewise linear with significant individual differences. 2) Extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness significantly predicted the initial level of SSS. 3) Extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism significantly predicted the rate of decline in the first stage of SSS. These results suggest that the SSS of high school freshmen is initially reformed within the first month of enrollment, during which personality plays a unique role.

Key words： high school freshman; transition to high school; Big Five personality; subjective social status; latent growth model

Cite this article

CHENG Gang , ZOU Yan , YU Wei , DING Fangyuan , JIA Yuncheng . The Relationship Between the Big Five Personality and the Trajectory of High School Freshmen’s Subjective Social Status During the School Transition Period: A Latent Growth Curve Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022 , 20(5) : 692 -699 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.05.017

References

程刚, 陈艳红, 关雨生, 张大均. (2015). 大学生主观社会地位的指标构成及特点. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 37(6), 156–162
程刚, 张大均, 肖友琴, 关雨生, 陈艳红. (2016). 大学新生主观社会地位与抑郁的变化轨迹: 一项多元潜变量增长模型分析. 心理发展与教育, 32(6), 753–760
梁钰苓, 邹泓, 孙鹏, 张文娟. (2013). 青少年人格五因素对其学校人际关系质量的影响. 中国特殊教育, (1), 68–72
聂衍刚, 林崇德, 郑雪, 丁莉, 彭以松. (2008). 青少年社会适应行为与大五人格的关系. 心理科学, 31(4), 774–779
曲可佳, 邹泓, 余益兵. (2010). 青少年孤独感与人格五因素的关系: 人际关系能力的中介作用. 心理学探新, 30(6), 75–80
张卓. (2020) “00后”大学生积极应对方式、人格特质与领悟社会支持的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 28(8), 1235–1238.
周颖萍. (2004). 浅析大五人格特质和社会群体地位的关系. 山东教育学院学报, 19(6), 41–43
Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116–132, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116.
Anglim, J., & O’Connor, P. (2019). Measurement and research using the Big Five, HEXACO, and narrow traits: A primer for researchers and practitioners. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(1), 16–25, doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12202.
Arnett, J. J., Žukauskienė, R, & Sugimura, K. (2014). The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18–29 years: Implications for mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(7), 569–576, doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00080-7.
Benner, A. D., Boyle, A. E., & Bakhtiari, F. (2017). Understanding students’ transition to high school: Demographic variation and the role of supportive relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(10), 2129–2142, doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0716-2.
Bucciol, A., Cavasso, B., & Zarri, L. (2015). Social status and personality traits. Journal of Economic Psychology, 51, 245–260, doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.10.002.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13, doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5.
Cundiff, J. M., & Matthews, K. A. (2017). Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 36(12), 1109–1125, doi: 10.1037/hea0000534.
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29, doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16.
Du, T. V., Yardley, A. E., & Thomas, K. M. (2021). Mapping big five personality traits within and across domains of interpersonal functioning. Assessment, 28(5), 1358–1375, doi: 10.1177/1073191120913952.
Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x.
Enz, K. F., & Talarico, J. M. (2016). Forks in the road: Memories of turning points and transitions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), 188–195, doi: 10.1002/acp.3176.
Field, R. D., Tobin, R. M., & Reese-Weber, M. (2014). Agreeableness, social self-efficacy, and conflict resolution strategies. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(2), 95–102, doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000131.
Harris, K., English, T., Harms, P. D., Gross, J. J., & Jackson, J. J. (2017). Why are extraverts more satisfied? Personality, social experiences, and subjective well-being in college. European Journal of Personality, 31(2), 170–186, doi: 10.1002/per.2101.
Jeung, W. (2013). Exploring the changing effects of individual differences on social status of influence (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
Judge, T. A., van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Pater, I. E. (2004). Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda for future research. Human Performance, 17(3), 325–346, doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1703_4.
Liu, G. Z., Zhang, D. J., Pan, Y. G., Hu, T. Q., He, N., Chen, W. F., & Wang, Z. (2017). Self-concept clarity and subjective social status as mediators between psychological suzhi and social anxiety in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 40–44, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.067.
Makover, H., Adrian, M., Wilks, C., Read, K., Stoep, A. V., & McCauley, E. (2019). Indicated prevention for depression at the transition to high school: Outcomes for depression and anxiety. Prevention Science, 20(4), 499–509, doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01005-5.
Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The Big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319–350, doi: 10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 587–596, doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1.
Ohannessian, C. M., Milan, S., & Vannucci, A. (2017). Gender differences in anxiety trajectories from middle to late adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(4), 826–839, doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0619-7.
Russell, M. A., & Odgers, C. L. (2020). Adolescents’ subjective social status predicts day-to-day mental health and future substance use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(S2), 532–544, doi: 10.1111/jora.12496.
Song, J., Gaspard, H., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2020). The Conscientiousness×Interest Compensation (CONIC) model: Generalizability across domains, outcomes, and predictors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 271–287, doi: 10.1037/edu0000379.
Tehrani, H. D., & Yamini, S. (2020). Personality traits and conflict resolution styles: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109794, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109794.
van Der Linden, D., Scholte, R. H. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., Nijenhuis, J. T., & Segers, E. (2010). Classroom ratings of likeability and popularity are related to the Big Five and the general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(5), 669–672, doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.08.007.
Wu, L. L., Xiao, Y. Q., Chen, Y. H., & Cheng, G. (2021). Family socioeconomic status, subjective social status, and achievement motivation among Chinese college freshmen: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(7), 2141–2161, doi: 10.1177/02654075211008244.
Ye, J. M., Huang, D. W., Li, Y. L., Liu, L., & Shi, M. W. (2022). Subjective social status of high school freshmen in the transitional period: The impact of extraversion. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(2), 971–983, doi: 10.1007/s11482-021-09945-3.
Yu, W., Cheng, G., Huang, J. J., Ding, F. Y., & Jia, Y. C. (2022). Trajectory of first-year students’ depressive mood after the transition to high school: The role of personality dimensions. School Psychology International, 43(1), 38–54, doi: 10.1177/01430343211049113.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

Copyright © Editorial office of Studies of Psychology and Behavior
Tel: 022-23540231, 23541213　E-mail: psybeh@126.com