Studies of Psychology and Behavior >
Measurement Invariance of the College Students’ Psychological Suzhi Questionnaire Simplified Version
Received date: 2022-07-05
Online published: 2023-07-14
Copyright
To test the measurement invariance of the College Students’ Psychological Suzhi Questionnaire Simplified Version (CSPSz-SV) across multi-groups and across times, the CSPSz-SV was used to investigate 1783 freshmen who came from 11 universities. Four hundred and forty-seven freshmen were re-investigated over six months interval. The multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MCFA) indicated that the three-factor structure (cognition, personality, and adaptability) of the CSPSz-SV had strict measurement invariance across genders (male and female), majors (social sciences and natural sciences), families (only child and non-only child), and regions (town and country). Furthermore, the three-factor solution of the CSPSz-SV also showed strict longitudinal invariance (e.g., equality of factor patterns, factor loadings, item intercepts, and item uniqueness for all items) across six-month period. Overall, the CSPSz-SV had strict measurement invariance across genders, majors, families, and regions, as well as strict longitudinal invariance over time.
Chengkui YAO , Siqi CHANG , Chuanzhang ZHENG , Wei CHEN , Gang CHENG , Jie LUO . Measurement Invariance of the College Students’ Psychological Suzhi Questionnaire Simplified Version[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023 , 21(3) : 312 -319 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.03.004
| 曹亦薇, 毛成美. 纵向Rasch模型在大学新生适应性追踪研究中的应用. 心理学报, 2008, 40 (4): 427- 436. | |
| 陈?巴特尔, 赵志军. 西部民族地区义务教育资源空间差异性及均衡性研究——基于国家义务教育均衡评估数据的实证分析. 教育发展研究, 2021, 41 (12): 61- 70. | |
| 陈万芬, 张大均, 桑标, 刘广增, 刘俊升. 小学生心理素质量表(简化版)的性别和纵向等值性. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019, 27 (1): 73- 77. | |
| 陈英和. (2012-06-25). 具有本土特色的心理素质研究获得国际影响力——评《学生心理素质培养模式及实施策略》. 中国社会科学报, p2, A08. | |
| 冯正直, 张大均. 中学生心理素质概念和成分的研究. 西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2001a, 27 (6): 56- 61. | |
| 冯正直, 张大均. 中学生心理素质量表的研制. 中国行为医学科学, 2001b, 10 (3): 223- 225. | |
| 龚玲. (2011). 大学生心理素质量表的修订(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆. | |
| 龚玲, 张大均, 王金良. 我国当代大学生心理素质的调查与评估. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 40 (3): 86- 92. | |
| 刘传星, 雷燕. 心理素质研究30年: 回眸与评析. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 41 (3): 96- 100. | |
| 刘广增, 张大均, 莫文静, 李佳佳, 朱政光. 青少年心理素质对社交焦虑的影响及其性别差异. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 44 (2): 91- 96. | |
| 刘衍玲. (2001). 小学生心理素质与学业成绩关系的研究(硕士学位论文). 西南师范大学, 重庆. | |
| 罗杰, 邹燕, 陈维, 武丽丽, 程刚, 郭成. 大学生心理素质问卷简化版的多元概化分析. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43 (2): 8- 13. | |
| 潘朝霞, 李冰冰. 大学生负性情绪调节效力的差异: 心理素质与性别的作用. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 45 (1): 113- 119. | |
| 王孟成. (2014). 潜变量建模与Mplus应用?基础篇. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社. | |
| 王滔. (2002). 大学生心理素质结构及其发展特点的研究(硕士学位论文). 西南师范大学, 重庆. | |
| 王滔, 张大均, 陈建文. 我国大学生心理素质研究20年的回顾与反思. 高等教育研究, 2007, 28 (4): 76- 83. | |
| 王鑫强, 张大均, 张雪琪. 简明大学生心理素质量表(健康版)的修编及信效度检验. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39 (8): 126- 132. | |
| 武丽丽, 张大均, 张雪琪, 程刚. 中学生心理素质量表全国常模的制定. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 43 (6): 98- 105. | |
| 张大均. 论人的心理素质. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1 (2): 143- 146. | |
| 张大均. (2004). 学校心理素质教育概论. 重庆: 西南师范大学出版社. | |
| 张大均, 苏志强, 王鑫强. 儿童青少年心理素质研究30年: 回顾与展望. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15 (1): 3- 11. | |
| 张大均, 张娟. 大学生心理素质问卷(简化版)的修编及信效度检验——基于双因子模型. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 44 (5): 84- 89. | |
| 张大均, 朱政光. 大学生心理素质的特点和影响因素——基于对大学生线上调查数据的分析. 教育研究, 2022, 43 (7): 126- 139. | |
| 张大均, 朱政光, 刘广增, 何花, 张婷. 大学生心理素质全国常模的建立. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 45 (5): 94- 100. | |
| Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y.. On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 2006, 13 (2): 186- 203. | |
| Chen, F. F.. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007, 14 (3): 464- 504. | |
| Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B.. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2002, 9 (2): 233- 255. | |
| Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. | |
| Furlong, M. J., Gilman. R., & Huebner, E. S. (2014). Handbook of positive psychology in schools (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. | |
| Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M.. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999, 6 (1): 1- 55. | |
| John, O. P., Naumann, L. R., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: The Guilford Press. | |
| Liu, Y., Millsap, R. E., West, S. G., Tein, J. Y., Tanaka, R., & Grimm, K. J.. Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures. Psychological Methods, 2017, 22 (3): 486- 506. | |
| Meade, A. W., Lautenschlager, G. J., & Hecht, J. E.. Establishing measurement equivalence and invariance in longitudinal data with item response theory. International Journal of Testing, 2005, 5 (3): 279- 300. | |
| Millsap, R. E., & Cham, H. (2012). Investigating factorial invariance in longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 109–127). New York: The Guilford Press. | |
| Raju, N. S., Laffitte, L. J., & Byrne, B. M.. Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87 (3): 517- 529. | |
| Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H.. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114 (3): 552- 566. | |
| Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D.. Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2014, 74 (1): 31- 57. | |
| Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G.. Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 2008, 18 (4): 210- 222. | |
| Sharma, S., Durvasula, S., & Ployhart, R. E.. The analysis of mean differences using mean and covariance structure analysis: Effect size estimation and error rates. Organizational Research Methods, 2012, 15 (1): 75- 102. | |
| Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F.. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91 (6): 1292- 1306. | |
| Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E.. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 2000, 3 (1): 4- 70. | |
| Zhang, D. J., Wang, J. L., & Yu, L. (2011). Methods and implementary strategies on cultivating students’ psychological suzhi. New York: Nova Science Publishers. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |