Studies of Psychology and Behavior >
Employee Proactive Personality and Workplace Well-Being: A Multilevel Moderated Mediation Model
Received date: 2023-02-09
Online published: 2023-11-10
Copyright
To explore the relationship between employees’ proactive personality and workplace well-being, as well as the role of psychological capital and coaching leadership in this relationship, this study conducted a questionnaire survey with 633 employees from 8 companies. Multi-level analyses showed that: 1) proactive personality positively predicted workplace well-being; 2) psychological capital played a mediating role between proactive personality and workplace well-being; 3) the mediating effect of psychological capital was positively moderated by coaching leadership. These results indicate that proactive personality affects workplace well-being through psychological capital, and coaching leadership strengthens the influence of proactive personality on psychological capital and the mediating role of psychological capital.
Lan ZHANG , Jinqin HOU , Zhiyan CHEN . Employee Proactive Personality and Workplace Well-Being: A Multilevel Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023 , 21(5) : 698 -704 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.05.017
| 曹曼, 席猛, 赵曙明. 高绩效工作系统对员工幸福感的影响——基于自我决定理论的跨层次模型. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22 (2): 176- 185. | |
| 陈梦桑, 向晓梅, 吴伟炯. 教练型领导-下属认知匹配对下属工作幸福感的影响. 南方经济, 2022, (4): 108- 124. | |
| 邓琪琪. 工作幸福感的理论动因与影响因素研究. 科技创业月刊, 2019, 32 (6): 131- 134. | |
| 方杰, 温忠麟. 三类多层中介效应分析方法比较. 心理科学, 2018, 41 (4): 962- 967. | |
| 付博, 梁潇杰, 杨朦晰. 上下级关系对下属工作幸福感的“双刃剑”效应. 管理学报, 2023, 20 (1): 66- 75. | |
| 高波, 彭正龙, 赵红丹. 教练型领导对下属职业成功的影响机制研究. 管理工程学报, 2021, 35 (6): 87- 96. | |
| 后玉蓉, 吴群琪, 桂嘉伟. 工作重塑与员工幸福感的关系研究: 基于自我决定理论的跨层次模型. 现代管理科学, 2021, (3): 31- 41. | |
| 胡可心. (2021). 教练型领导对员工跨界行为的影响——内部人身份感知的中介作用(硕士学位论文). 兰州大学. | |
| 雷雳, 张雷. 多层线性模型的原理及应用. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2002, (2): 110- 114. | |
| 李斌, 马红宇, 殷华敏, 郭永玉, 李爱梅. 员工主动性人格对其心理资本的影响. 华东经济管理, 2014, 28 (10): 133- 136. | |
| 林颐宣. 主动性人格对小学教师工作满意度的影响: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36 (1): 103- 112. | |
| 刘西真, 赵慧军. 工作幸福感对知识共享的影响. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2019, 21 (4): 84- 92. | |
| 马金鹏. (2018). 主动性人格对工作幸福感的影响研究(硕士学位论文). 山东大学, 济南. | |
| 商佳音, 甘怡群. 主动性人格对大学毕业生职业决策自我效能的影响. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 45 (3): 548- 554. | |
| 申正付, 杨秀木, 孙雪芹, 贺庆功, 韩布新. 人格特征、一般自我效能感对大学生主观幸福感的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21 (2): 303- 305. | |
| 史烽, 安迪, 蔡翔. 创新活动需要好教练吗? 教练型领导对员工创新行为的影响机制. 中国人力资源开发, 2018, 35 (5): 37- 48. | |
| 王雁飞, 张静茹, 林星驰, 周良海, 朱瑜. 教练型领导行为研究现状与展望. 外国经济与管理, 2016, 38 (5): 44- 57. | |
| 熊猛, 叶一舵. 心理资本: 理论、测量、影响因素及作用. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2014, 32 (3): 84- 92. | |
| 熊正德, 张艳艳, 姚柱. 员工主动性人格对其追随力的影响——基于心理资本中介和变革型领导调节作用的研究. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 38 (5): 43- 50. | |
| 杨强, 龚婧婧, 许丽媛, 游津津, 叶宝娟, 张莹莹. 父母支持对大学生生涯适应力的影响: 心理资本和职业探索的链式中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29 (4): 846- 849. | |
| 叶蒲, 胥彦, 李超平. 服务型领导如何跨层次影响工作繁荣?——关系型能量和学习目标取向的作用. 管理评论, 2022, 34 (7): 224- 235. | |
| 俞国良, 李建良, 王勍. 生态系统理论与青少年心理健康教育. 教育研究, 2018, 39 (3): 110- 117. | |
| 张颖, 杨付. 主动性人格: 机制与未来走向. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25 (9): 1544- 1551. | |
| 周愉凡, 张建卫, 张晨宇, 李海红, 滑卫军. 主动性人格对研发人员创新行为的作用机理——基于特质激活与资源保存理论整合性视角. 软科学, 2020, 34 (7): 33- 37. | |
| 朱瑜, 吕阳, 王雁飞, 王丽璇. 教练型领导如何影响员工创新? 跨层次被调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 2018, 50 (3): 327- 336. | |
| 邹琼, 佐斌, 代涛涛. 工作幸福感: 概念、测量水平与因果模型. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23 (4): 669- 678. | |
| Bliese, P. D.. Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1998, 1 (4): 355- 373. | |
| Bone, K. D.. The Bioecological Model: Applications in holistic workplace well-being management. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 2015, 8 (4): 256- 271. | |
| Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The bioecological model of human development. In N. Eisenberg, R. A. Fabes, & T. L. Spinrad (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 793–827). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. | |
| Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | |
| Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., Bachrach, D. G., Wang, Y. L., & Elmada? Ba?, A. B.. Organizational investments in social capital, managerial coaching, and employee work-related performance. Management Learning, 2011, 42 (1): 67- 85. | |
| Hao, T. M., Chen, Y. W., & Yang, S. (2019). Relationship between proactive personality and employee well-being: Mediating effect of psychological capital. 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Hangzhou. | |
| LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L.. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 2008, 11 (4): 815- 852. | |
| Liao, P. Y. (2021). Linking proactive personality to well-being: The mediating role of person-environment fit. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211040118. | |
| Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2006). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | |
| Moore, J. R., Hankins, S., & Doughty, S. E.. Successful employees with disabilities through the lens of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory: A case study at sephora. Journal of Business Diversity, 2020, 20 (5): 10- 19. | |
| Zheng, X. M., Zhu, W. C., Zhao, H. X., & Zhang, C.. Employee well-being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2015, 36 (5): 621- 644. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |