
Studies of Psychology and Behavior >
The Effect of Expectation and Temporal Attention on Visual Perception
Received date: 2021-11-29
Online published: 2024-05-13
Copyright
Two experiments were undertaken to explore the interaction between temporal attention and expectations rooted in conditional probabilities concerning visual perception by using the attentional blink paradigm. The results showed that visual sensitivity was higher for expected stimuli whereas it was lower for unexpected stimuli when the stimuli were in the attentional blank phase compared to the neutral condition. Additionally, the decision criteria was lower for expected stimuli and the subjective visibility was higher for unexpected stimuli, regardless of whether the stimuli were in the blink phase or not. These findings provide support to a synergistic model of expectation and attention within the framework of predictive coding theory.
Chunye FU , Yong LYU . The Effect of Expectation and Temporal Attention on Visual Perception[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024 , 22(1) : 15 -22 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.003
| 周子暖, 陈颜璋, 傅世敏. 预期对注意的影响受制于被预期主体是目标还是分心物. 心理学报, 2022, 54 (3): 221- 235. | |
| Alef Ophir, E., Sherman, E., & Lamy, D. (2020). An attentional blink in the absence of spatial attention: A cost of awareness? Psychological Research, 84(4), 1039–1055. | |
| Alilovi?, J., Slagter, H. A., & van Gaal, S.. Subjective visibility report is facilitated by conscious predictions only. Consciousness and Cognition, 2021, 87, 103048. | |
| Bang, J. W., & Rahnev, D.. Stimulus expectation alters decision criterion but not sensory signal in perceptual decision making. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7 (1): 17072. | |
| Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C.. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995, 21 (1): 109- 127. | |
| Clark, A.. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2013, 36 (3): 181- 204. | |
| de Lange, F. P., Heilbron, M., & Kok, P. (2018). How do expectations shape perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(9), 764–779. | |
| Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A.. G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 2007, 39 (2): 175- 191. | |
| Feuerriegel, D., Vogels, R., & Kovács, G.. Evaluating the evidence for expectation suppression in the visual system. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2021, 126, 368- 381. | |
| Friston, K.. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2005, 360 (1456): 815- 836. | |
| Garc??a-Pérez, M. A.. Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: Asymptotic and small-sample properties. Vision Research, 1998, 38 (12): 1861- 1881. | |
| Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley. | |
| Jabar, S. B., & Fougnie, D. (2022). How do expectations change behavior? Investigating the contributions at encoding versus decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(2), 226–241. | |
| Jiang, J. F., Summerfield, C., & Egner, T.. Attention sharpens the distinction between expected and unexpected percepts in the visual brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2013, 33 (47): 18438- 18447. | |
| Jolic?ur, P., Sessa, P., Dell’Acqua, R., & Robitaille, N.. Attentional control and capture in the attentional blink paradigm: Evidence from human electrophysiology. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2006, 18 (4): 560- 578. | |
| Kok, P., Brouwer, G. J., van Gerven, M. A. J., & de Lange, F. P.. Prior expectations bias sensory representations in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 2013, 33 (41): 16275- 16284. | |
| Lamy, D., Carmel, T., & Peremen, Z.. Prior conscious experience enhances conscious perception but does not affect response priming. Cognition, 2017, 160, 62- 81. | |
| Meijs, E. L., Mostert, P., Slagter, H. A., de Lange, F. P., & van Gaal, S.. Exploring the role of expectations and stimulus relevance on stimulus-specific neural representations and conscious report. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2019, (1): 11. | |
| Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G.. On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7 (1): 44- 64. | |
| Papera, M., & Richards, A.. Attentional gain and processing capacity limits predict the propensity to neglect unexpected visual stimuli. Psychophysiology, 2016, 53 (5): 634- 649. | |
| Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860. | |
| Richter, D., & de Lange, F. P.. Statistical learning attenuates visual activity only for attended stimuli. eLife, 2019, 8, e47869. | |
| Rungratsameetaweemana, N., Itthipuripat, S., Salazar, A., & Serences, J. T.. Expectations do not alter early sensory processing during perceptual decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 2018, 38 (24): 5632- 5648. | |
| Rungratsameetaweemana, N., & Serences, J. T.. Dissociating the impact of attention and expectation on early sensory processing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2019, 29, 181- 186. | |
| Sherman, M. T., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., & Kanai, R.. Prior expectations facilitate metacognition for perceptual decision. Consciousness and Cognition, 2015, 35, 53- 65. | |
| Smout, C. A., Garrido, M. I., & Mattingley, J. B.. Global effects of feature-based attention depend on surprise. NeuroImage, 2020, 215, 116785. | |
| Smout, C. A., Tang, M. F., Garrido, M. I., & Mattingley, J. B.. Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors. PLoS Biology, 2019, 17 (2): e2006812. | |
| Summerfield, C., & Egner, T.. Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2009, 13 (9): 403- 409. | |
| Summerfield, C., & Egner, T.. Feature-based attention and feature-based expectation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2016, 20 (6): 401- 404. | |
| Summerfield, C., Egner, T., Mangels, J., & Hirsch, J.. Mistaking a house for a face: Neural correlates of misperception in healthy humans. Cerebral Cortex, 2006, 16 (4): 500- 508. | |
| Sun, M., Shang, C. Y., Jia, X., Liu, F., Cui, L. X., Wei, P., & Zhang, Q.. Expectation modulates the preferential processing of task-irrelevant fear in the attentional blink: Evidence from event-related potentials. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2022, 18 (1): 16. | |
| Wang, F., & Maurer, U.. Interaction of top-down category-level expectation and bottom-up sensory input in early stages of visual-orthographic processing. Neuropsychologia, 2020, 137, 107299. | |
| Zuanazzi, A., & Noppeney, U.. The intricate interplay of spatial attention and expectation: A multisensory perspective. Multisensory Research, 2020, 33 (4?5): 383- 416. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |