三维场景中内隐记忆的空间更新

心理与行为研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 736-742.

三维场景中内隐记忆的空间更新

李士一, 周日, 孙璐, 谢岩枫, 赵光

教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300387;
天津师范大学心理学部, 天津 300387;
国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2019-01-18 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2020-01-13
通讯作者: 李士一,E-mail:lishiyi@tjnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31800921）

Spatial Updating in Implicit Memory of 3D Scenes

LI Shiyi, ZHOU Ri, SUN Lu, XIE Yanfeng, ZHAO Guang

Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
Center of Collaborative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of Mental Health, Tianjin 300387

Received:2019-01-18 Online:2019-11-20 Published:2020-01-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 空间更新效应是指个体在三维空间中移动时，对周围物体与自身位置之间相对关系进行的自动更新。本研究以背景线索效应为例，考察三维空间中的内隐空间记忆是否存在空间更新。实验采用2（观察者移动与否）×2（场景旋转与否）的被试间设计，探究学习阶段的背景线索效应在不同的实验条件下能否迁移到测试阶段。结果发现：观察者移动组、控制组效应能够迁移，场景旋转组、场景旋转且观察者移动组效应不能迁移。结果证明，三维场景的内隐记忆中也存在空间更新。

关键词: 内隐记忆, 空间更新, 背景线索效应, 空间记忆

Abstract: The spatial update effect refers to the automatic updating of the relative relationship between the surrounding objects and the viewer’s body as the viewer moves through three-dimensional space. This study takes the contextual cueing effect as an example to explore the existence of spatial updating in implicit spatial memory of three-dimensional scenes. The present experiment adopted the 2 (the observer moves or not)×2 (scenes rotation or not) between-group design to explore whether the contextual cueing effect of the learning phase can be migrated to the test phase under different experimental conditions. The results showed that it could be migrated in the observer move group and control group, while not in the scene rotated group, scene rotated combined with observer move group. It is proved that there is also spatial update in the implicit memory of the three-dimensional scene.

Key words: implicit memory, spatial updating, contextual cueing effect, spatial memory

中图分类号:

B842.3

李士一, 周日, 孙璐, 谢岩枫, 赵光. 三维场景中内隐记忆的空间更新[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 736-742.

LI Shiyi, ZHOU Ri, SUN Lu, XIE Yanfeng, ZHAO Guang. Spatial Updating in Implicit Memory of 3D Scenes[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(6): 736-742.

参考文献

李士一, 白学军, 王雨薇, 郑蕾, 孙弘进. (2017). 二维场景旋转下的背景提示效应. 心理与行为研究, 15(3), 289-294, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2017.03.001
肖承丽, 刘传军. (2014). 对想象环境的空间更新. 心理学报, 46(9), 1289-1300
Bar, M. (2001). Viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition does not necessarily imply viewer-centered representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(6), 793-799, doi:10.1162/08989290152541458.
Brockmole, J. R. (2008). The visual world in memory. New York:Psychology Press.
Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes:Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(7), 1177-1187, doi:10.1080/17470210600665996.
Burgess, N. (2006). Spatial memory:How egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(12), 551-557, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.005.
Burgess, N., Spiers, H. J., & Paleologou, E. (2004). Orientational manoeuvres in the dark:Dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition, 94(2), 149-166, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001.
Chua, K. P., & Chun, M. M. (2003). Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(1), 72-80.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing:Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28-71, doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0681.
Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8(4), 302-307, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00442.x.
Jiang, Y., Song, J.-H., & Rigas, A. (2005). High-capacity spatial contextual memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 524-529.
Kelly, J. W., McNamara, T. P., Bodenheimer, B., Carr, T. H., & Rieser, J. J. (2009). Individual differences in using geometric and featural cues to maintain spatial orientation:Cue quantity and cue ambiguity are more important than cue type. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 176-181.
Kelly, J. W., Sjolund, L. A., & Sturz, B. R. (2013). Geometric cues, reference frames, and the equivalence of experienced-aligned and novel-aligned views in human spatial memory. Cognition, 126(3), 459-474, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.007.
Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9(4), 293-298, doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00058.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492-527, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492.
Marchette, S. A., & Shelton, A. L. (2010). Object properties and frame of reference in spatial memory representations. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 10(1), 1-27.
Mou, W. M., McNamara, T. P., Rump, B., & Xiao, C. J. (2006). Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(6), 1274-1290, doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1274.
Reber, P. J. (2013). The neural basis of implicit learning and memory:A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research. Neuropsychologia, 51(10), 2026-2042, doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.019.
Riecke, B. E., & von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2(3), 183-215, doi:10.1145/1077399.1077401.
Schacter, D. L. (1992). Priming and multiple memory systems:Perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(3), 244-256, doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.244.
Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43(4), 274-310, doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0758.
Shi, Z. H., Zang, X. L., Jia, L. N., Geyer, T., & Müller, H. J. (2013). Transfer of contextual cueing in full-icon display remapping. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 2-2, doi:10.1167/13.3.2.
Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9(4), 315-320, doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00062.
Tsuchiai, T., Matsumiya, K., Kuriki, I., & Shioiri, S. (2012). Implicit learning of viewpoint-independent spatial layouts. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 207.
Wang, R. F. (2003). Spatial representations and spatial updating. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 42, 109-156, doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(03)01004-1.
Wang, R. F. (2012). Theories of spatial representations and reference frames:What can configuration errors tell us? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 575-587.
Wang, R. F. (2017). Spatial updating and common misinterpretations of spatial reference frames. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 17(3), 222-249.
Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70(2), 191-210, doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00012-8.
Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 77(3), 215-250, doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00105-0.
Wolbers, T., Hegarty, M., Büchel, C., & Loomis, J. M. (2008). Spatial updating:How the brain keeps track of changing object locations during observer motion. Nature Neuroscience, 11(10), 1223-1230, doi:10.1038/nn.2189.
Xie, C. X., Li, S. Y., Tao, W. D., Wei, Y. P., & Sun, H. J. (2017). Representing spatial layout according to intrinsic frames of reference:Limitations from position regularity and instructions. Psychological Reports, 120(5), 846-869, doi:10.1177/0033294117711129.
Zang, X., Shi, Z., Müller, H. J., & Conci, M. (2017). Contextual cueing in 3D visual search depends on representations in planar-, not depth-defined space. Journal of Vision, 17(5), 17-17, doi:10.1167/17.5.17.
Zhao, G., Zhuang, Q., Ma, J., Tu, S., Liu, Q., & Sun, H. (2017). Contextual cueing effect in spatial layout defined by binocular disparity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1472, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01472.

[1]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[2]	高超, 李士一, 章鹏, 赵光. 基于双眼视差探讨深度知觉信息对背景线索效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 16-21,29.
[3]	李士一, 白学军, 王雨薇, 郑蕾, 孙弘进. 二维场景旋转下的背景提示效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 289-294.
[4]	张玥, 刘越月, 石加男. 积极情绪强度对广告外显和内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 541-546.
[5]	王黎静,杨丽娴. 负性情绪词语在外显和内隐记忆测验中的定向遗忘效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 13-17.
[6]	刘仙芸，刘书青，王超. 空间参照系建立的时间特征^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 469-475.
[7]	陶云霍俊丽高松叶存春. 心境一致性对大学生外显和内隐记忆影响的实验研究[J]. , 2007, 5(3): 171-176.
[8]	吉峰,梁宝勇. 内隐记忆中的神经机制研究方法[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(1): 57-60.
[9]	杨治良,周颖,李林. 无意识认知的探索[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(3): 161-165.
[10]	吕勇, 韩宗义, 杜英春. 启动效应的ERP研究综述[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(2): 151-155.