道德认同对大学生亲社会行为倾向的影响：共情的中介作用和正念的调节作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用道德认同量表、人际反应指针量表、亲社会行为倾向量表和五因素正念度量表对533名大学生进行调查，探讨道德认同对大学生亲社会行为倾向的影响机制。结果表明：（1）道德认同的两个维度—道德认同内化和道德认同符号化均能正向预测大学生亲社会行为倾向；（2）共情在道德认同内化和符号化对大学生亲社会行为倾向的影响过程中起部分中介作用；（3）正念在道德认同内化和符号化通过共情对大学生亲社会行为倾向的影响过程中起调节作用，正念减弱了道德认同符号化对亲社会行为倾向的正向影响，增强了共情对亲社会行为倾向的正向影响。

关键词: 亲社会行为倾向, 道德认同内化, 道德认同符号化, 共情, 正念

Abstract: This study aimed to explore the mechanism of the influence of moral identity on college students’ prosocial behavior tendency by conducting a survey on 533 college students with Moral Identity Measure, Interpersonal Reactivity Index, Prosocial Tendencies Measure, and Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. The results showed that: 1) both internalization and symbolization were significantly positively related to college students’ prosocial behavior tendency; 2) empathy played a partial mediating role in the effect of internalization and symbolization on college students’ prosocial behavior tendency; 3) mindfulness played a moderating role in the effect of internalization and symbolization on college students’ prosocial behavior tendency. Mindfulness weakened the positive effect of moral identity symbolization on prosocial behavior tendency, while it enhanced the positive effect of empathy on prosocial behavior tendency.

Key words: prosocial behavior tendency, moral identity internalization, moral identity symbolization, empathy, mindfulness

中图分类号:

B844

郭英, 陈灿杰, 胡东, 袁安怡. 道德认同对大学生亲社会行为倾向的影响：共情的中介作用和正念的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 80-87.

GUO Ying, CHEN Canjie, HU Dong, YUAN Anyi. Moral Identity and College Students’ Prosocial Behavior Tendency: The Mediating Effect of Empathy and the Moderating Effect of Mindfulness[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 80-87.

参考文献

寇彧, 洪慧芳, 谭晨, 李磊. (2007). 青少年亲社会倾向量表的修订. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 112–117
万增奎, 杨韶刚. (2008). 青少年道德自我认同问卷的修订. 社会心理科学, 23(5), 41–45, 77.
张凤凤, 董毅, 汪凯, 詹志禹, 谢伦芳. (2010). 中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)的信度及效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 155–157
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942–950
Aquino, K., & Kay, A. (2018). A social cognitive model of moral identity. In K. Gray & J. Graham (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 133–140). New York: The Guilford Press.
Aquino, K., McFerran, B., & Laven, M. (2011). Moral identity and the experience of moral elevation in response to acts of uncommon goodness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 703–718, doi: 10.1037/a0022540.
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423.
Aydin Sünbül, Z. (2021). Indirect relations of mindful awareness with different forms of prosocial actions within college students: The mediating role of empathy. Current Psychology, 40, 126–132, doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00342-6.
Batson, C. D. (2017). The empathy-altruism hypothesis: What and so what? In E. M. Seppälä, E. Simon-Thomas, S. L. Brown, M. C. Worline, C. D. Cameron, & J. R. Doty (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compassion science (pp. 27–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berry, D. R., Cairo, A. H., Goodman, R. J., Quaglia, J. T., Green, J. D., & Brown, K. W. (2018). Mindfulness increases prosocial responses toward ostracized strangers through empathic concern. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(1), 93–112, doi: 10.1037/xge0000392.
Berry, D. R., Hoerr, J. P., Cesko, S., Alayoubi, A., Carpio, K., Zirzow, H., … Beaver, V. (2020). Does mindfulness training without explicit ethics-based instruction promote prosocial behaviors? A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1247–1269, doi: 10.1177/0146167219900418.
Boegershausen, J., Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2015). Moral identity. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 162–166, doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.017.
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237, doi: 10.1080/10478400701598298.
Condon, P. (2017). Mindfulness, compassion, and prosocial behaviour. In J. C. Karremans & E. K. Papies (Eds.), Mindfulness in social psychology (pp. 124–138). New York: Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9781315627700-9.
Crimston, C. R., Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., & Bastian, B. (2016). Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 636–653, doi: 10.1037/pspp0000086.
Deng, Y. Q., Liu, X. H., Rodriguez, M. A., & Xia, C. Y. (2011). The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Mindfulness, 2(2), 123–128, doi: 10.1007/s12671-011-0050-9.
Ding, W., Shao, Y. H., Sun, B. H., Xie, R. B., Li, W. J., & Wang, X. Z. (2018). How can prosocial behavior be motivated? The different roles of moral judgment, moral elevation, and moral identity among the young Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 814, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00814.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160, doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Gotowiec, S., & van Mastrigt, S. (2019). Having versus doing: The roles of moral identity internalization and symbolization for prosocial behaviors. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(1), 75–91, doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1454394.
Goubert, L., Craig, K. D., Vervoort, T., Morley, S., Sullivan, M. J. L., de Williams, C. A. C., Cano, A., & Crombez, G. (2005). Facing others in pain: The effects of empathy. PAIN, 118(3), 285–288, doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.10.025.
Hardy, S. A., Nadal, A. R. C., & Schwartz, S. J. (2017). The integration of personal identity, religious identity, and moral identity in emerging adulthood. Identity, 17(2), 96–107, doi: 10.1080/15283488.2017.1305905.
Hardy, S. A., Walker, L. J., Rackham, D. D., & Olsen, J. A. (2012). Religiosity and adolescent empathy and aggression: The mediating role of moral identity. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(3), 237–248, doi: 10.1037/a0027566.
Hertz, S. G., & Krettenauer, T. (2016). Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior? A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 20(2), 129–140, doi: 10.1037/gpr0000062.
Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jain, S., Shapiro, S. L., Swanick, S., Roesch, S. C., Mills, P. J., Bell, I., & Schwartz, G. E. R. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: Effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(1), 11–21, doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3301_2.
Karremans, J. C., & Papies, E. K. (2017). Why social psychologists should care about mindfulness. In J. C. Karremans & E. K. Papies (Eds.), Mindfulness in social psychology (pp. 1–14). New York: Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9781315627700-1.
Kaur, S. (2020). Effect of religiosity and moral identity internalization on prosocial behaviour. Journal of Human Values, 26(2), 186–198, doi: 10.1177/0971685820901402.
Lee, S., Winterich, K. P., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (2014). I’m moral, but I won’t help you: The distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 678–696, doi: 10.1086/677226.
Rosenberg, E. L., Zanesco, A. P., King, B. G., Aichele, S. R., Jacobs, T. L., Bridwell, D. A., … Saron, C. D. (2015). Intensive meditation training influences emotional responses to suffering. Emotion, 15(6), 775–790, doi: 10.1037/emo0000080.
Schindler, S., Pfattheicher, S., & Reinhard, M. A. (2019). Potential negative consequences of mindfulness in the moral domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 1055–1069, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2570.
Schultz P. P., & Ryan R. M. (2015) The “Why,” “What,” and “How” of healthy self-regulation: Mindfulness and well-being from a self-determination theory perspective. In B. D. Ostafin, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness and self-regulation (pp. 81–94). New York: Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2263-5_7.
van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2018). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086–1099, doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1.
Winterich, K. P., Aquino, K., Mittal, V., & Swartz, R. (2013). When moral identity symbolization motivates prosocial behavior: The role of recognition and moral identity internalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5), 759–770, doi: 10.1037/a0033177.
Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (2009). Donation behavior toward in-groups and out-groups: The role of gender and moral identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 199–214, doi: 10.1086/596720.

[1]	钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 悲伤表情识别能力影响疼痛共情—一项ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 585-592.
[2]	王刚, 刘赛凤, 李琦琛, 文岱, 伍韫旖, 蒋波西, 李放. 父母忽视与青少年短视频过度使用的关系：正念和自我控制的中介机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 487-493.
[3]	靳铭, 曾练平, 曾小叶, 黄亚夫. 高中生正念与学习倦怠：基于自我调节学习模型的视角[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 494-500.
[4]	罗利, 杨东, 陈圣栋, 高伟, 陈永强, 袁加锦. 特质敬畏对亲社会倾向的正向预测：自我超越和共情的多重中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 390-396.
[5]	刘璇璇, 张李斌, 刘峥, 杨喆, 李丽娜. 正念训练对康复期精神分裂症患者抑制控制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 138-144.
[6]	黄鹤, 王小英, 吕博. 家庭累积风险与流动学前儿童的问题行为：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 779-785.
[7]	蒋天翔, 马宁. 正念训练对睡眠质量与日间警觉性的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 542-548.
[8]	颜志强, 李珊. 共情和抑郁的关系：同伴关系的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 424-430.
[9]	高玲, 花苏晴, 李沛沛, 杨继平, 王兴超. 同胞关系与青少年亲社会行为：道德推脱的中介作用和共情的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 216-222.
[10]	张洁婷, 杨翠梅, 吴舒莹, 张境锋, 康武, 迟新丽. 四周简易正念减压训练对初中生焦虑的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 104-110.
[11]	张振. 自恋与攻击行为的关系：观点采择和共情关注的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 131-136.
[12]	黄明明, 赵守盈. 述情障碍对大学生手机成瘾倾向的影响：孤独感与正念的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 686-692.
[13]	宋娟, 杜梦, 连涛, 张倩. 积极怀旧情绪对疼痛共情影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 466-473.
[14]	谭千保, 李佳圆, 刘旭. 累积生态风险对农村初中生攻击行为的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 489-495.
[15]	衡书鹏, 赵换方, 熊建萍, 周宗奎. 网络募捐中求助者的面部表情对捐助意愿的影响：有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 92-99.