不确定感与从众：决断性与结构需求的中介作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.02.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 不确定感伴随从众的现象普遍存在，然而其内在加工过程及个体差异仍不明确。对804名大学生被试进行问卷调查，结果显示：（1）不确定感与从众正相关；（2）决断性与结构需求完全中介不确定感与从众的关系，且存在性别差异；二者关系上，女性更大程度上受决断性的中介，其次为结构需求；男性受决断性和结构需求的平行中介。结果支持不确定−认同理论和认知闭合两阶段模型观点，为不确定状态下不同性别人群从众行为的管理提供了理论依据。

关键词: 不确定感, 从众, 认知闭合需要, 决断性, 结构需求

Abstract: Uncertainty occurs along with the phenomenon of conformity, although the underlying process and the gender difference are not clarified. The current study applied a cross-sectional questionnaire to 804 college participants. The results showed that: 1) uncertainty was positively correlated with conformity; 2) decisiveness and need for structure completely mediated the relationship between uncertainty and conformity and showed a gender difference: the relation between uncertainty and conformity for women was primarily mediated by decisiveness, while that for men was parallelly mediated by decisiveness and need for structure. This study supports the uncertain-identity theory and the two-factor model of cognitive closure, providing a theoretical basis for managing the conformity of genders under uncertainty.

Key words: uncertainty, conformity, need for cognitive closure, decisiveness, need for structure

中图分类号:

B842

韩瑞康, 林静远, 梅颖, 李开云, 林丰勋, 雷怡, 李红. 不确定感与从众：决断性与结构需求的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 174-181.

HAN Ruikang, LIN Jingyuan, MEI Ying, LI Kaiyun, LIN Fengxun, LEI Yi, LI Hong. Uncertainty and Conformity: The Mediating Effect of Decisiveness and Need for Structure[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 174-181.

参考文献

刘华禹. (2018). 高低阶层者在不确定感高时都更相信阴谋论吗? (硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
刘雪峰, 梁钧平. (2007). 认知闭合需要的测量及其对工作结果的影响. 经济科学, (4), 119–128
刘子旻, 时勘, 万金, 陈晨. (2018). 认知闭合需要研究梳理与未来走向. 心理科学进展, 26(4), 688–697
杨庆, 毕重增, 李林, 黄希庭. (2017). 自我不确定感: 内涵、结构和理论. 心理科学进展, 25(6), 1012–1024
张红, 任靖远, 刘晨阳, 罗劲. (2019). 创造性产品评价中的从众效应. 心理学报, 51(6), 688–698
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942–950
周琳. (2019). 从众心理与青少年网络游戏成瘾的关系: 班级氛围的调节作用 (硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
Balafoutas, L., & Sutter, M. (2019). How uncertainty and ambiguity in tournaments affect gender differences in competitive behavior. European Economic Review, 118, 1–13, doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.05.005.
Brizi, A., Mannetti, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2016). The closing of open minds: Need for closure moderates the impact of uncertainty salience on outgroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(2), 244–262, doi: 10.1111/bjso.12131.
Campbell, J. D., Tesser, A., & Fairey, P. J. (1986). Conformity and attention to the stimulus: Some temporal and contextual dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 315–324, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.315.
Cichocka, A., Bilewicz, M., Jost, J. T., Marrouch, N., & Witkowska, M. (2016). On the grammar of politics-or why conservatives prefer nouns. Political Psychology, 37(6), 799–815, doi: 10.1111/pops.12327.
Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 10(5), 191–198, doi: 10.1037/h0040237.
de Acedo Lizárraga, M. L. S., de Acedo Baquedano, M. T. S., & Cardelle-Elawar, M. (2007). Factors that affect decision making: Gender and age differences. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7(3), 381–391.
de Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S. L., & Oldersma, F. L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 348–362.
DeSimone, J. A., & Harms, P. D. (2018). Dirty data: The effects of screening respondents who provide low-quality data in survey research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(5), 559–577, doi: 10.1007/s10869-017-9514-9.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Fishbaugh, L. (1981). Sex differences in conformity: Surveillance by the group as a determinant of male nonconformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 384–394, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.384.
Federico, C. M., Hunt, C. V., & Fisher, E. L. (2013). Uncertainty and status-based asymmetries in the distinction between the “Good” us and the “Bad” them: Evidence that group status strengthens the relationship between the need for cognitive closure and extremity in intergroup differentiation. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 473–494, doi: 10.1111/josi.12025.
Feng, C. L., Cao, J. Q., Li, Y. L., Wu, H. Y., & Mobbs, D. (2018). The pursuit of social acceptance: Aberrant conformity in social anxiety disorder. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(8), 809–817, doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy052.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140, doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202.
Fromkin, H. L., & Snyder, C. R. (1980). The search for uniqueness and valuation of scarcity. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange (pp. 57–75). Boston: Springer.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Hertz, N., & Wiese, E. (2016). Influence of agent type and task ambiguity on conformity in social decision making. Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 313–317.
Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69–126). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hogg, M. A., & Mullin, B. A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249–279). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Kaikati, A. M., Torelli, C. J., Winterich, K. P., & Rodas, M. A. (2017). Conforming conservatives: How salient social identities can increase donations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 422–434, doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2017.06.001.
Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & de Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113(1), 84–100, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263–283, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263.
Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 861–876, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861.
Laugesen, N. (2007). The relationship between adolescent worry, intolerance of uncertainty, and fear of anxiety (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A., Taris, T., & Bezinovic, P. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the need for cognitive closure scale: Comparing its structure in Croatia, Italy, USA and the Netherlands. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 139–156, doi: 10.1348/014466602165108.
Mullin, B. A., & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Dimensions of subjective uncertainty in social identification and minimal intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), 345–365, doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01176.x.
Nagy, V., Herczeg-Kézdy, A., Martos, T., & Urbán, S. (2018). The Hungarian mysticism scale and its associations with measures of religiosity, personality, and cognitive closure. European Journal of Mental Health, 13(2), 133–149, doi: 10.5708/EJMH.13.2018.2.2.
Neuberg, S. L., Judice, T. N., & West, S. G. (1997). What the Need for Closure Scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1396–1412, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1396.
Overgaauw, S., Jansen, M., Korbee, N. J., & de Bruijn, E. R. A. (2019). Neural mechanisms involved in social conformity and psychopathic traits: Prediction errors, reward processing and saliency. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 160, doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00160.
Proulx, T., & Heine, S. J. (2010). The frog in Kierkegaard’s beer: Finding meaning in the threat-compensation literature. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 889–905, doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00304.x.
Proulx, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). The five “A”s of meaning maintenance: Finding meaning in the theories of sense-making. Psychological Inquiry, 23(4), 317–335, doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.702372.
Rietzschel, E. F., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2007). Personal need for structure and creative performance: The moderating influence of fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 855–866, doi: 10.1177/0146167207301017.
Rosen, N. O., Ivanova, E., & Knäuper, B. (2014). Differentiating intolerance of uncertainty from three related but distinct constructs. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 27(1), 55–73.
Schultz, P. W., & Searleman, A. (1998). Personal need for structure, the Einstellung task, and the effects of stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(3), 305–310, doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00179-7.
Singh, V., Schiebener, J., Müller, S. M., Liebherr, M., Brand, M., & Buelow, M. T. (2020). Country and sex differences in decision making under uncertainty and risk. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 486, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00486.
Sollár, T., & Vanečková, J. (2012). Need for closure, ability to achieve closure and monitoring-blunting cognitive coping style. Studia Psychologica, 54(2), 137–142.
Thompson, M. M., Naccarato, M. E., Parker, K. C. H., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2001). The personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity measures: Historical perspectives, current applications, and future directions. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 19–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
van den Bos, K. (2009). Making sense of life: The existential self trying to deal with personal uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry, 20(4), 197–217, doi: 10.1080/10478400903333411.
van den Bos, R., Homberg, J., & de Visser, L. (2013). A critical review of sex differences in decision-making tasks: Focus on the Iowa Gambling Task. Behavioural Brain Research, 238, 95–108, doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.002.
van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M., & Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 824–837.
Webber, D., Babush, M., Schori-Eyal, N., Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis, A., Hettiarachchi, M., Bélanger, J. J., … Gelfand, M. J. (2018). The road to extremism: Field and experimental evidence that significance loss-induced need for closure fosters radicalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 270–285, doi: 10.1037/pspi0000111.
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049.
Wijenayake, S., van Berkel, N., Kostakos, V., & Goncalves, J. (2020). Impact of contextual and personal determinants on online social conformity. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106302, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106302.

[1]	何一清, 孙颖. 感知环境不确定性与环境扫描对认知变化的影响——认知闭合需要与认知需要的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 771-778.
[2]	赵春黎, 黄禄华, 周晓林. 人际关系感知影响记忆从众[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 101-107.
[3]	李宗龙, 胡冬梅, 张堂正. 价格框架对不同认知闭合需要者在线动态价格的感知与购买意愿的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 537-543.
[4]	徐炀,李虹. 虚拟逃生环境中视野范围和紧急程度对疏散效率的影响：从众行为的中介作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 311-319.
[5]	邬钟灵, 司继伟, 许晓华. 认知闭合需要与启发式策略对价格判断的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 387-394.