初中生依恋风格与欺凌保护行为的关系：社会支持和欺凌应对效能的链式中介作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.02.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为考察初中生依恋风格与欺凌保护行为的关系，同时探讨社会支持和欺凌应对效能的链式中介作用，采用问卷法对565名初中生进行调查。结果发现：（1）依恋焦虑与欺凌保护行为呈显著正相关，依恋回避与欺凌保护行为呈显著负相关；（2）社会支持和欺凌应对效能在依恋回避与欺凌保护行为之间起链式中介作用。若要增加依恋回避初中生的欺凌保护行为，应注重为其提供社会支持，提升欺凌应对效能。

关键词: 依恋焦虑, 依恋回避, 欺凌保护行为, 社会支持, 欺凌应对效能

Abstract: This study aimed to examine the relationship between middle school students’ attachment style and defending behaviors in bullying, and to explore the mediating role of social support and bullying coping efficacy. A questionnaire survey was conducted among a sample of 565 middle school students. The results showed that: 1) attachment anxiety was positively related to defending behaviors in bullying, and attachment was negatively related to defending behaviors in bullying; 2) social support and bullying coping efficacy played a chain mediating role in the process of attachment avoidance associated with defending behaviors in bullying. If we want to increase the defending behaviors in bullying of attachment avoidance of middle school students, we should pay attention to providing social support and improving bullying coping efficacy.

Key words: attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, defending behaviors in bullying, social support, bullying coping efficacy

中图分类号:

B844

张林, 洪新伟, 范航, 陈燕铃, 赵明玉, 朱婷婷, 刘燊. 初中生依恋风格与欺凌保护行为的关系：社会支持和欺凌应对效能的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 212-218.

ZHANG Lin, HONG Xinwei, FAN Hang, CHEN Yanling, ZHAO Mingyu, ZHU Tingting, LIU Shen. Attachment Style and Defending Behaviors in Bullying Among Middle School Students: Chain Mediation Roles of Social Support and Bullying Coping Efficacy[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 212-218.

参考文献

李同归, 加藤和生. (2006). 成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表(ECR)中文版. 心理学报, 38(3), 399–406
刘勤学, 陈武, 周宗奎. (2015). 大学生网络使用与网络利他行为: 网络使用自我效能和性别的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 685–693
马原啸, 冉光明, 陈旭. (2016). 不安全依恋者注意偏向的形成机制及神经基础. 心理科学进展, 24(3), 392–401
任萍, 张云运, 周艳云. (2018). 校园欺负中的积极参与角色: 保护者. 心理科学进展, 26(1), 98–106
王才康, 胡中锋, 刘勇. (2001). 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究. 应用心理学, 7(1), 37–40
王秀娟, 王娜, 韩尚锋, 刘燊, 张林. (2018). 面孔可信度对助人行为的影响: 依恋安全的调节作用. 心理学报, 50(11), 1292–1302
王艳辉, 李董平, 孙文强, 赵力燕, 赖雪芬, 周月月. (2017). 亲子依恋与初中生亲社会行为: 有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 49(5), 663–679
夏晓彤, 段锦云, 黄辛隐. (2021). 错失恐惧对亲社会行为的影响. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 344–352
肖水源. (1994). 《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用. 临床精神医学杂志, 4(2), 98–100
谢其利, 李崇敬, 全小山, 何飞, 江光荣. (2018). 少年夫妻老来伴: 夫妻依恋与留守老人孤独感. 心理学报, 50(7), 771–781
张鹏, 张斌梅子, 邹建科, 刘翔平. (2018). 安全依恋启动影响社会行为: 方法、效果与机制. 心理科学, 41(3), 615–620
张鹏, 张艺缤, 韩瑞雪, 刘翔平. (2017). 亲密关系经历量表在我国青少年中的信、效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(5), 873–876
赵凯莉, 杨梦圆, 苗灵童, 刘燊, 张林. (2017). 成人依恋对大学生网络利他行为的影响: 共情与信任的中介作用. 人类工效学, 23(3), 23–28, 34.
钟韵, 刘聚红, 陈旭. (2014). 青少年同伴依恋: 基于发展的视角. 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1149–1158
周宵, 伍新春, 王文超, 田雨馨. (2019). 汶川地震8.5年后青少年的社会支持与创伤后成长的关系: 自我效能感和自尊的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 35(5), 573–580
Bai, B., Chao, G. C. N., & Wang, C. (2019). The relationship between social support, self-efficacy, and English language learning achievement in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 208–221, doi: 10.1002/tesq.439.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bistrong, E., Bottiani, J. H., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2019). Youth reactions to bullying: Exploring the factors associated with students’ willingness to intervene. Journal of School Violence, 18(4), 522–535.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664–678.
Casey, E. A., Lindhorst, T., & Storer, H. L. (2017). The situational-cognitive model of adolescent bystander behavior: Modeling bystander decision-making in the context of bullying and teen dating violence. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 33–44, doi: 10.1037/vio0000033.
Corcoran, K. O. C., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2000). Adult attachment, self-efficacy, perspective taking, and conflict resolution. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78(4), 473–483.
Creasey, G., Kershaw, K., & Boston, A. (1999). Conflict management with friends and romantic partners: The role of attachment and negative mood regulation expectancies. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(5), 523–543, doi: 10.1023/A:1021650525419.
Demaray, M. K., Summers, K. H., Jenkins, L. N., & Becker, L. D. (2016). Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ): Establishing a reliable and valid measure. Journal of School Violence, 15(2), 158–188, doi: 10.1080/15388220.2014.964801.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 1–17.
Fan, H., Xue, L. L., Zhang, J., Qiu, S. Q., Chen, L. P., & Liu, S. (2021). Victimization and depressive symptoms among Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Affective Disorders, 294, 375–381, doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.022.
Fang, Y., Niu, Y., & Dong, Y. (2021). Exploring the relationship between narcissism and depression: The mediating roles of perceived social support and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110604, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110604.
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 93–105.
Gökdağ, C. (2021). How does interpersonal emotion regulation explain psychological distress? The roles of attachment style and social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 176, 110763, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110763.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511.
Jenkins, L. N., & Fredrick, S. S. (2017). Social capital and bystander behavior in bullying: Internalizing problems as a barrier to prosocial intervention. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(4), 757–771.
Kogut, E. (2016). Adult attachment styles, self-efficacy, and causal attributional style for achievement-related failures. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 64–72, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.001.
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221, doi: 10.1037/h0026570.
Leng, J., Guo, Q. K., Ma, B. Q., Zhang, S. Y., & Sun, P. (2020). Bridging personality and online prosocial behavior: The roles of empathy, moral identity, and social self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575053, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575053.
Li, S., Han, S. F., Wang, X. J., Guo, Z. B., Gan, Y. T., & Zhang, L. (2021). The influence of risk situation and attachment style on helping behavior: An attentional bias perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110357, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110357.
Mallinckrodt, B., & Wei, M. F. (2005). Attachment, social competencies, social support, and psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 358–367, doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.358.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.
Patterson, L. J., Allan, A., & Cross, D. (2017). Adolescent perceptions of bystanders’ responses to cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 19(3), 366–383.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Robinson, J. S., Joel, S., & Plaks, J. E. (2015). Empathy for the group versus indifference toward the victim: Effects of anxious and avoidant attachment on moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 139–152, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.017.
Samper-García, P., Malonda-Vidal, E., Llorca-Mestre, A., Muñoz-Navarro, R., & Mestre-Escrivá, V. (2021). Victimization and peer and parents attachment: The mediating effect of regulatory emotional self-efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2062, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042062.
Schwarzer, R., Mueller, J., & Greenglass, E. (1999). Assessment of perceived general self-efficacy on the internet: Data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 12(2), 145–161.
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Dewall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 56–66.
Wood, L., Smith, J., Varjas, K., & Meyers, J. (2017). School personnel social support and nonsupport for bystanders of bullying: Exploring student perspectives. Journal of School Psychology, 61, 1–17.
Zhang, L. J., Zhang, S. P., Yang, Y., & Li, C. N. (2017). Attachment orientations and dispositional gratitude: The mediating roles of perceived social support and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 193–197, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.006.

[1]	余益兵, 于家伟, 李艳如, 杜宜展. 农村留守儿童领悟家庭支持、朋友支持与抑郁的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 472-478.
[2]	鲍旭辉, 黄杰, 李娜, 李健军, 李亚红. 主动性人格对学习投入的影响：领悟社会支持和积极情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 508-514.
[3]	曾练平, 曾小叶, 黄亚夫, 赵守盈. 领悟社会支持与中小学教师工作绩效：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 404-411.
[4]	姜琨, 兰泽波, 孙晓铜, 丁晓辉, 陶佳雨. 听障大学生社会支持对学业自我效能感的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 96-100.
[5]	姚崇, 惠琪, 王媛, 席海莎, 雒朝梁. 公费师范教师社会支持与职业倦怠的关系探究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 816-823.
[6]	刘拓, 陈雪明, 芦旭蓉, 杨莹. 父母积极教养方式对中学生应对方式的影响：社会支持、自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 507-514.
[7]	魏灵真, 刘衍玲, 刘传星, 林杰, 王旭. 家庭亲密度对高中生心理健康的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 361-367.
[8]	闫广芬, 姜琨, 兰泽波, 丁晓辉. 听障大学生社会支持对适应的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 252-257.
[9]	王江洋, 于子洋, 聂家昕. 自我污名与孤儿学生消极情绪的关系：解释风格及领悟社会支持的多重中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 777-783.
[10]	王小凤, 燕良轼. 不良生活经历对大学生冷酷无情特质的影响：有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 846-853.
[11]	张何雅婷, 张宝山, 金豆, 林瑶. 领悟社会支持在老年人的居住地情感认同和控制感之间的中介作用：一个纵向模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 854-860.
[12]	张野, 韩雪, 张珊珊, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生外化问题行为的影响：有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 354-360.
[13]	徐文明, 叶彩霞, 方烨仪. 早期累积家庭风险对青少年内化问题的影响：弹性双重机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 361-368.
[14]	辛勇, 白柯, 陈谢平, 朱殿庆, 刘传军. 社会支持对青少年创伤后成长的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 817-823.
[15]	丁倩, 张永欣, 魏华, 胡伟. 中庸思维与大学生网络成瘾：社会支持和孤独感的序列中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 553-560.